Hassle-free virtualization with an impressive ROI and industry-leading support.
Updated December 07, 2023
Hassle-free virtualization with an impressive ROI and industry-leading support.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Scale Computing Platform
We use the Scale HC3 Hypervisor as primary hypervisor for Windows and Linux servers as well as virtual appliances. We also use it as extension to our backup strategy, which allows us to create as many application consistent snapshots as we like, to go back in time whenever needed.
- Customer support and service is outstanding.
- Updates and upgrades are hassle-free with no downtime.
- No need to worry about hardware, BIOS, drivers, firmware.
- Outstanding handling of snapshots with thousands of snapshots possible with almost no disk cost and no IO costs. We snapshot each VM every hour and keep snapshots for 48 hours and 2 weeks.
- REST API can be used to create your own reports and scripts.
- The Hypervisor just runs. No downtimes since it was integrated 2 years ago.
- Replication to another cluster is very easy
- It exposes no backup API. You have to treat VMs as physical machines, with all the drawbacks. This is a huge problem, since the official partner Acronis can't deliver. If you ever worked with Veeam you want it back very very badly.
- Assigned RAM is used RAM. The hypervisor can't share memory or only allocate what is used etc. It's wasted RAM most of the time.
- No logging and auditing. (There is, but not visible to the customer).
- The GUI is quite bad. It looks like done by a designer instead of an IT expert. But it's improving constantly.
- The company relies heavily on KVM, but seems to have no developer in the open source community. This leads to answers like "we can't do anything about QEMU drivers". Yes, you can. Have delevopers working on it.
- You can't do basic things like list all of your VMs and see how much RAM/disk, etc. they are using (e.g. in a list view).
- No rules on which VMs start on which nodes, which VMs to prioritize, etc.
Windows Domain, Exchange, File Server, Print Server, IP Phones, Web Server, Application, Server Load Balancer .....
- We have a huge ROI because of saving on manpower for setup, maintenance, administration, updates, extensions, support calls and also our backup strategy.
- Saving on administration time is at least 99% compared to the market leader.
- The Hypervisor cluster can be extended without any planning, downtime and about 30 min of setup time.
- Very good addition to our backup strategy. We generally don't need to restore from disk/tape, but just go back in time to a snapshot or mount any snapshot from any disk from any server to any other server to check for deleted files, etc.
- Support calls are hassle-free, fast and have no overhead of collection logs or dealing with first-level support, etc.
KVM: Scale HC3 Hypervisors builds on KVM, but extends it massively with their hassle-free setup, integration and support. Proxmox: Also builds on KVM, but needs much more manpower to keep it running. VMware ESXi: I'm a long-time ESXi expert and had to deal with all the hassles of which driver and firmware fits which update. While ESXi can do more, it can't do the hassle-free "it just works" experience of Scale HC3 Hypervisor. Also the support went from ok-ish to catastrophic in the last two years (2020-2022). I sincerely hope I have never to waste months(!) of my lifetime with researching drivers, firmware, problems, fixes and everything else ESXi makes you do to keep the system up and running. And I never ever want to deal with their support again, that basically consists of one week first-level support (send logs. send more logs) and then maybe you get a technician that has a faint idea what you are talking about.
Do you think Scale Computing Platform delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Scale Computing Platform's feature set?
Yes
Did Scale Computing Platform live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Scale Computing Platform go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Scale Computing Platform again?
Yes
User Experience with Scale Computing
Generally at every support case.
Using Scale Computing Platform
4 - Head of IT, Senior System Engineer, Admins
2 - IT Admin
- Virtualization
- Real time Backup
- Replication
- Hundreds of Snapshots per VM with no drawbacks
- Creating very detailed and customized reports using REST API
- Mounting disks from VMS to other VMs as independet copies. Using that as fast file restore from snapshots.
- More replication
Evaluating Scale Computing Platform and Competitors
Yes - ESXi / VMWare
- Ease of Use
- Other
Security and Price
I would not bother with VMWare ever again. Bad support, security problems and complicated update process (if you do it the correct way).
Scale Computing Platform Support
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Quick Resolution Good followup Knowledgeable team Problems get solved Kept well informed No escalation required Immediate help available Support understands my problem Support cares about my success Quick Initial Response | None |
No need, normal support is great already.
Yes - It was resolved, but it took a long time and basically I had to find the source myself. That was the only time when support was not excellent.
Using Scale Computing Platform
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Easy to use Technical support not required Consistent Quick to learn Convenient Familiar | None |
- VM Handling
- Snapshot handling
- Replication
- VM statistics
- Host statistics
- Reports