Overall Satisfaction with TestComplete
I used [TestComplete] with ASP software in [the] testing team. It is flexible [and easy to] define our automation framework and scripts according to what we need. I design the test cases based on user scenarios then use TestComplete to execute [and] collect results [that] then generate the reports. It is easy to analyze the issues based on the Testcomplete report.
- TestComplete couldn't identify all objects in my software but we could declare some class/function to do this.
- We could use the command line to call TestExecute to execute the scripts automatically.
- It supports multiple OS and it could update in time once MicroSoft releases new OS.
- It doesn't support HTML5 well but i would like to use the same tool to test all the tested software.
- It is strongly dependent on the screen resolution. if it could include embedded resolution to execute then it would be better.
- Some objects couldn't be identified correctly and we have to spend more time to analysis the reason. If TestComplete could provide more possibilities, then it would be nice.
- Positive: It saves us a lot of time on non-regression test on C/S software application
- Positive: It can provide promptly response when we need technical support
- Negative: It seems not quickly follow up the windows OS migration
Do you think TestComplete delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with TestComplete's feature set?
Yes
Did TestComplete live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of TestComplete go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy TestComplete again?
Yes