1. Home
  2. Functional Testing Tools
  3. TestComplete Reviews
  4. User Review of TestComplete
Find out the Best Automation Tool for your APP and it is TestComplete.
Updated August 05, 2021

Find out the Best Automation Tool for your APP and it is TestComplete.

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Reseller

Overall Satisfaction with TestComplete

TestComplete can be used fully to automate all desktop, web, and mobile apps across different teams or organizations. Most of the ROI reduces a lot of scripting and time, in order to solve errors and warnings since TestComplete supports AI driven self-healing mechanisms. It also integrates with all the CI/CD tools/bug tracking tools easily.
It has increased speed by delivery (record/playback, reusability of scripts), automation made simpler(manual testers/anybody can use it with no skillset), and delivery of the quality customers want (AI features helps you correct and detect potential issues).

  • Scriptless record/playback, ample language support (JavaScript, Python, Delphi,VB,Jscript,C++,C#), conversion of keywords, test to scripts, reusability of scripts.
  • Self-healing of test cases with new AI feature(IQ), intelligent fix of errors and warnings, PDF support, BDD framework(Cucumber and HipTest), latest integration with BitBar, Azure Develops, Zephyr for Jira.
  • Excel checkpoints, public documentation, user friendly Interface
  • 24/7 support from resellers and Smart Bear. More performance and less memory
  • Integrates with bug tracking tools(Jira, Zephyr, Bugzilla) Report Generation -Junit, Allure, MHT.
  • Object recognition should be improved for better recognition of third-party / custom controls.
  • It supports only Windows OS. It should support MAC, Unix/Linux so that we can automate these OS's apps.
  • If the number of team members is 20 total, and the number of test cases per year is 3000, test cases that should be automated per year 1000, test case complexity is medium and at last configurations(OS's, Browsers, resolutions) of the test are 75.
  • You can save $21,601,815 and (502,367) hours after 5 years of using TestComplete.
  • Impact, always be positive and it also depends on one's skillset; better use of the features, implementing it on Framework and CI/CD pipeline, etc.
  • I would say, negative impact happens for highly complex apps which need more scripting and time to implement in the tool (a very rare case scenario).
  • ROI is a must to whomever uses TestComplete.
I have used UFT, Katalon Studio.
UFT has robust object recognition engine than TestComplete.
For example, Katalon Studio supports Groovy and Java so it is easier for programmers/testers to automate apps in java as it is a popular language, but TC doesn't support it.
Integrations: Katalon Studio supports CircleCI and Bambo and even custom CI/CD integration, but no support from TestComplete.
Cloud Device integrations: Katalon Studio supports LambdaTest, Sauce Labs, browser Stack and custom integration, but no support from TestComplete.


Do you think TestComplete delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with TestComplete's feature set?

Yes

Did TestComplete live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of TestComplete go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy TestComplete again?

Yes

Especially, I recommend TestComplete for people who don't have any automation experience or knowledge or manual testers as it is very user-friendly and supports a record/playback feature which is the faster way to create test cases for any application. Even well-talented automation engineers can use the detail and get the best out of its robust features (more scripting languages support, import any libraries and customize the script for better automation, full CI/CD support, AI can be used for error handling).

I want to give only 9 because it needs some improvement in object recognition on custom/third-party controls, automation on mainframe apps, stability, scalability.