Overall Satisfaction with TestComplete
We are migrating Manual TestCases to an Automated framework using TestComplete. I am responsible for creating this framework integrating TestComplete with Jenkins and the qTest management tool. Our software is responsible for simulation and is based on C++ with MFC library and for testing. Our main problem with automation is correct create locators and mapping for all of our cases in-app which contains a lot of old code and new approach and [integrating] it with one testing framework
- OCR Text Recognition
- Easy for manual testers
- A lot of languages supported
- Python interpreter is POOR - no possibility to install using pip, no terminal...
- More support for CI/CD like Jenkins
- OCR actions could have more built-in functionality for keyword-in scripts you can easily extend
- Automation of our testcases
- Repeatability of tests
- Finally Regression testing
- Speed up testing process
TestStand is a much more complex tool than TestComplete and it's for a little bit different solutions I think. For desktop apps I would use the TestComplete, For Mobile / Web -> Python + Behave + Pytest selenium - TestComplete is much overcomplicated and slow! For embedded/electronics - TestStand Depends on what u want to test.
Do you think TestComplete delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with TestComplete's feature set?
Yes
Did TestComplete live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of TestComplete go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy TestComplete again?
Yes