How TestComplete Eased Up Our Daily Work Life
Updated March 28, 2022
How TestComplete Eased Up Our Daily Work Life
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with TestComplete
We use TestComplete to automate the regression tests of our products. Since our products are constantly improving and growing we need something that assists us in finding unpredicted bugs and searching bugs in already existing features, so that our release doesn't take that much time just for regression and we can concentrate more on new features. [Therefore] we try to fully automate our regression list in TestComplete.
- Git integration
- Compatible with many software products, web applications, mobile applications
- A lot of build in actions
- Project structure is very good
- User cannot sort folders in an individual order
- Working in documents is not supported (like Word documents)
- More time for users to test new features instead of already existing ones
- Find bugs which appeared through new feature implementation
We still use both products in our company, since Postman is mainly used for backend automation and TestComplete for frontend automation. The difference is that via Postman you can easily write tests that send different requests to your server, get the response, and compare them to the expected response. Via TestComplete you can easily write tests that check whether the response of your server is processed and displayed correctly in the frontend of your product. So I don't really think you can compare those two since you can use them coherently.
Do you think TestComplete delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with TestComplete's feature set?
Yes
Did TestComplete live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of TestComplete go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy TestComplete again?
Yes