Overall Satisfaction with VMware vSAN
We use vSAN in the College of Life Sciences at BYU. We have two VMware clusters with multiple hosts. vSAN allows us to utilize the storage of each host to create a virtual storage pool for our virtual machines. It has allowed us to eliminate our previous SAN and the administration that came with having a SAN. We no longer need a storage administrator.
- It is built in vCenter so you don't need to run a virtual controller VM on each host.
- Very easy to implement, it is just a matter of purchasing licenses and turning it on.
- Simple to monitor within the vSphere console.
- I have not found anything about VSAN that needs improvement. It does what it is supposed to do, and is easy to work with.
- With vSAN, we no longer need a storage admin to run a SAN. And yet we still have all the functionality in vSphere including vMotion.
- With vSAN, we no longer need a storage admin to run a SAN. And yet we still have all the functionality in vSphere including vMotion.
- HPE SimpliVity (formerly OmniCube)
We used HPE SimpliVity in the past. HPE SimpliVity provided a similar functionality, but it required a virtual controller VM on each host which consumed CPU, RAM, and Storage. Upgrades and maintenance on the HPE SimpliVity nodes was more difficult because the controller VMs had to be shutdown separately because they could not be vMotioned to another host. vSAN is a far superior product.
Do you think VMware vSAN delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with VMware vSAN's feature set?
Yes
Did VMware vSAN live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of VMware vSAN go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy VMware vSAN again?
Yes