UI is great, but system management very difficult.
November 26, 2012
UI is great, but system management very difficult.
Score 5 out of 10
Vetted Review
Software Version
v17
Modules Used
- Human Capital Management (HCM)
Overall Satisfaction
- The application interface is great. It is very user friendly from a user perspective.
- It presents organization charts in a very user friendly, dynamic way. It’s nice to have something that’s always up to date. Of course it’s dependent on business processes flowing data into HR for updating.
- System management is incredibly difficult. The software is based upon Business Objects which is well organized and quick, but not something I or I believe most people are familiar with. It is not your typical relational database. You cannot see data in the background and need to know where to go to find it. It is hence difficult to create reports and to enact integrations to other systems. It presents a lot of challenges.
- It is very expensive, and we typically have to pay outside consultants to do build outs. We typically contract with our support provider - OneSource VHR, based in Dallas. They are a Workday reseller and we bought Workday through them. Companies of a smaller size cannot buy direct from Workday.
- Security administration is relatively difficult. Sometimes things are locked down and you don’t know why one person cannot see something that another person can.
- The mass import tool is impossible to use. It relies heavily on reference IDs, which makes sense, but there are 3 different types of reference ID s and usage is not clear cut.
- It is not easy to do organizational changes.
- The biggest benefit is being able to track the state of the company as far as people – to know how many employees we have, who is where and being able to enable employees to self-manage benefits and contact information, HSA/FSA contributions. It puts a lot more ownership in employees to manage the data.
- We are looking to expand usage to enable managers to do workflows, e.g. transfer employees to other departments once approved by HR; to allow managers to submit spot bonuses. This all removes administration tasks from HR.
- We would be closer to where we want to be, if we had better understanding of the system, and more time.
Product Usage
1000 - The whole company
2 - IT Program Manager 50%, 2 people in HR – HR manager and Workday admin.
- HCM (Human Capital Management) – supports new hires, terminations, basic employee information tracking, payroll, time off, time sheets, benefits, recruiting, performance evaluations.
- We use a separate tool - iCIMS for recruiting. Workday is not a recruiting tool and cannot track all applicants. You only put in short list. We would like to integrate iCIMS with Workday, but have not yet.
- We are looking at adding the new time-sheet module and are interested in using it. Currently we use out of box functionality, not the enhanced version.
Evaluation and Selection
We were using a combination of ADP tools like Pay Express
Staying with ADP, Ultipro. The selection was done prior to my joining.
Implementation
- Professional services company
OneSource VHR
Training
Configuration
There are some things we do, like time-off without a vacation program (we don’t accrue). For timesheets – we don’t have approvals, just for tracking.
Support
Usability
Reliability
Integration
- NetSuite
- Benefits providers - BCBS, IMED, Cygna
- Active Directory
- Learning Management System
- Octa (Single Sign-On tool)
NetSuite – really just an export. A payroll file is generated from Workday and imported into the general ledger.
LMS – there is a direct link to send employee information like hire date, organization position etc. Data does not flow back to Workday. There is an import tool, but it is not part of our plan to use it.
LMS – there is a direct link to send employee information like hire date, organization position etc. Data does not flow back to Workday. There is an import tool, but it is not part of our plan to use it.
Vendor Relationship
All our negotiations were with OneSource. Implementation cost started out at $300k – we took a lot of things out, but then also negotiated. We also had them roll in some training.
When we did the change order to have them load our tenant with more current data – they priced it at $75k and we pushed back to $1500 but the scope of work was vastly different.
We signed a contract in August and were supposed to pay in September for subscription fees, but our finance department pushed back and we were able to defer payment until November in line with when we were going to test software – look out for subscription start date.
When we did the change order to have them load our tenant with more current data – they priced it at $75k and we pushed back to $1500 but the scope of work was vastly different.
We signed a contract in August and were supposed to pay in September for subscription fees, but our finance department pushed back and we were able to defer payment until November in line with when we were going to test software – look out for subscription start date.