FigJam is an online interactive whiteboard from Figma headquartered in San Francisco, presently in beta (2021) but available to the public in a free trial. The vendor states that in 2022, FigJam will have plans for $0, $8, and $15 per editor, per month.
$5
per month per editor
Miro
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Miro provides a visual workspace for innovation that enables distributed teams of any size to dream, design, and build the future together. Today, Miro counts more than 60 million users in 200,000 organizations who use Miro to improve product development collaboration, to speed up time to market, and to make sure that new products and services deliver on customer needs.
$10
per month per user
Pricing
FigJam
Miro
Editions & Modules
FigJam Professional
$36
per year per editor
FigJam Organization
$60
per year per editor
1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
$0
2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
$8
per month (billed annually) per user
3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
$16
per month (billed annually) per user
4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
contact sales
annual billing per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FigJam
Miro
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
—
Monthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan.
Positive: FigJam is cheaper than Miro and allows connecting with FigJam, where we design our user interfaces. FigJam is more complete and visually appealing than draw.io, although draw.io is free. FigJam allows calls, which both competitors do not. Negative: Miro has …
I feel like Figjam is great at at what it does. It provides a great overall place to be able to use a virtual whiteboard and help teams collaborate. Especially remote teams. It actually does it better than others. There are some tools such as InVision Freehand that at the …
We selected Miro because it is really simple to use and it is accessible through a link with a login. I love the whiteboard feel that resembles how we used to work when work meant being in person. A lot of the other tools have more of a specific role in a project where Miro can …
We were originally using Mural, but it did not satisfy our company's security standards and we also had a lot of issues with it freezing when we would have more than ~10 people collaborating on the board at once, so we made the switch to Miro back in 2020. At first, Miro felt …
There are so many reasons why I prefer Miro to FigJam. The connections are essential to me articulating my thought process. I have never said this about a piece of software before, but everything I make inside Miro is beautiful. Often, I recreate visual deliverables made in FigJ…
Mural and Miro seem extremely similar. I'm not as familiar with Mural but love all the tools in Miro for conducting actual sessions (timers, voting, etc.). FigJam is terrible - no comparison there.
I started with Mural during Covid but quickly switched to Miro due to better usability and design possibilities on Miro. Tools like FigJam were nice to have but I always preferred MIRO over FigJam or any other tool as I got used to it quickly and found everything that I needed.
In many cases the other tools did a single thing better than Miro but overall Miro better solved all our needs. In some cases, like FigJam the hurdle was licensing. Teams just doesn't have an awesome set of features. MindMap is good for what it is but not so good for other …
Miro is the preferred choice however due to access/license issues of some stakeholders, FigJam is sometimes used instead as it allows users to participate without a license. draw.io is a preferred choice for business process mapping however is not inuitive to share and cannot …
I used Mural before Miro. I liked that it had quite a few templates, but disliked how ugly things got quickly. the restrictive design system of Miro means that you have to work HARD to make things ugly (though my SOs certainly seem to find a way).
Miro has more capabilities. FigJam is sometimes easier to integrate bc our team uses Figma a lot. But Miro is better when expanding out to people outside our department.
Miro's UI and UX is better overall in my opinion. FigJam seems way too complicated in some areas and underdelivers in other areas. I really like how FigJam handles sticky notes though, a but more than Miro in that area.
Miro is more feature complete than fig jam but Figma has added a few fun quality of life features that make it a little bit more fun to use, but I could totally see Miro bringing in some of those interactions like cursor chat and high-fives
Miro seemed more powerful and provided more functionality at the time of testing. The learning curve for Miro seemed shallower when compared to fig jam.
Miro is much more flexible in terms of plugins, much scaleable, and very handy in terms of usage, AI tool in it helps a lot to quickly get the template and make life more easier. I found the Miro is much more advanced than any tool I used in the past. I love this.
Miro is first still in my mind. Miro in my opinion has the potential to become its own operating system where with the help of better integrations can hold everything you need to perform and operate during work and possibly outside work.
Miro is the best for collaboration because it’s super fast, can host lots of people, and automatically captures feedback I can share in a single link, or specific links to specific art boards
Miro is superior around actual presenting, and the features are easier to find and use overall. I think the community is also superior. Lucid Spark was much cheaper and could do 80%, but Miro shines if you are a consultant who wants to leverage the best tools.