The Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite empowers teams to ideate, plan, design, build, and launch game-changing solutions from a shared infinite canvas.
$1
per month
Miro
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Miro provides a visual workspace for innovation that enables distributed teams of any size to dream, design, and build the future together. Today, Miro counts more than 60 million users in 200,000 organizations who use Miro to improve product development collaboration, to speed up time to market, and to make sure that new products and services deliver on customer needs.
$10
per month per user
Pricing
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Miro
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
Individual
$7.95
per month, per user
Team
$9.00
per month, 3 user minimum
Enterprise
.
per year
1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
$0
2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
$8
per month (billed annually) per user
3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
$16
per month (billed annually) per user
4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
contact sales
annual billing per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Miro
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
Optional
Additional Details
—
Monthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan.
If it's solo work, I prefer Lucidchart over all its competitors. For larger group collaboration, Lucidspark or Miro is much much preferred than Lucidchart. Figma is ok for some basic use but can't handle complex stuffs. MURAL and Visio are just terrible products to use in …
Miro is good for workshops and project planning but Lucidchart is more useful for architectural diagrams but it does not have stickers and fancy colors like in Miro used in workshops
Lucidchart, draw.io, Miro all deliver the same core functionality of diagramming software. Lucidchart has integration ecosystem, with so many tools/apps (Asana, Google Sheets live connector, Saleforce, etc) that why enterprises and business choose Lucidchart. Compared to Miro, …
Verified User
Consultant
Chose Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
I like Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite more than both of those for the ease of use and collaboration. Miro is similar with collaboration but didn't find as easy to use and Visio is similar to use but a bit harder to collaborate with.
I have used Miro, but we use them for different things. There's not much I can compare as we use them only for what each one of them is strong, but if I had to compare, Miro doesn't have the power to deal with database diagrams like Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite Lucidchart …
Miro had an advantage with the unlimited canvas until Lucidchart recently added that feature. Lucidchart seems to be better designed for creating drawings, incredibly technical or software architectural diagrams. Miro appears to be more designed for non-technical folks as a …
I did not select Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite. That decision was taken by others in the organization. Given a choice, I am not sure I would have selected Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite. Miro was already established and, with a local client, was a better user experience in …
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite has a more professional feel, an easier way of organizing and a simpler look. Miro, while very similar, has more aggressive color schemes and a more toy like UI that does not inspire as much confidence in our stakeholders.
Much better, it doesn't get the steps in lines even a tenth as much as Visio, can use custom shapes as actual shapes rather than images, and aligns much easier. Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite is easily the best and I have tried about 4-5 programs over the last 5 years.
draw.io is a free tool which has very limited functionality. Some of the advanced features like AI based generation and templates are not available in other applications. Also, I’ve used bot framework for different purposes. If customer wants to collaborate and they don’t have …
SmartDraw's templates appeared to offer more selection and were slightly better. They offer desktop apps for Mac and Windows (if that's your thing). However, we feel that Lucidchart has better sharing and collaboration tools and we opted to go with this software over SmartDraw …
We started using LucidChart after switching from another visual collaboration tool. The import process worked surprisingly well - way better than anyone on our team was expecting. Lucidchart itself is simple to use, easy to collaborate with coworkers, has a ton of built-in …
I think Lucidchart is just better for diagramming complex engineer scenarios. For software engineers, it's really hard to beat. I do like these other tools I have listed, but my favorite is still Lucidchart because it has so many high-quality features that really matter for …
I think that among other diagramming tools, Lucidchart is one of the most complete and advanced. For its expertise in diagrams, it offers a wide range of options when it comes to making any kind of diagram because, unlike its competitors that have multiple uses, they do not …
Promapp is better for collaborating about processes and maintaing process ownership. Lucidchart is very versatile and allows us to do a lot more. I prefer Lucidspark to LucidChart for most applications, however. I wish there was a single license for the two, or at least a bundled …
We used lucidchart to create quick tech documentation but Miro is able to do that plus a lot more on the design/brain storming side. We used smartsheets for roadmapping and still would for in-depth project management and budgeting but Miro is more visually appealing for a high …
There are some areas where I really prefer lucidchart - particularly around complex ERDs, process engineering, and impact assessments. lucidchart's integration options and exporting options are all more thorough than Miro. However, Miro is a far superior tool when comparing it …
Enterprise grade, learning curve, SSO integration, security for teams' data/boards, and number of concurrent collaborators is where Miro was able to shine and partly why we suggested it over the other tools.
Miro has an advantage in live collaboration over Lucid Chart - which is a software our company still uses from time to time in addition to Miro. For any collaborative flow charts/diagrams, we tend to use Miro.
I'm not a UX pro, but for my needs, Miro blew away the competition for two main reasons. First, Miro is so incredibly easy to get set up with and get running. It's not intimidating to use and it's easy for anyone on my team to just jump in and collaborate with me (even those …
Miro is way easier, has much more flexibility and is far more effective to collaborate on. It is really that simple. I can do almost everything I want to do on there but it remains easy to pick up for people that I ask to collaborate with me. I did not personally choose Miro …
Initially, it was slightly tricky switching over, and I worried about it not having the same features, but now I can't remember any differences. Nothing is missing.
Miro started as a collaboration tool and we needed a tool in a remote work environment. We have expanded use of Miro for project artifacts and communication.
I have used Visio and Lucid in the past; they are not great. The biggest competitor, I think, is Excalidraw. It's free and works great for stuff other than the group collaboration piece. I think it might do that, too, but I don't pay for it. It beats Miro on quick and fast …
Figma - Miro is easier to learn than Figma. I dont have much experience with Figjam Adobe XD - i dont even use this anymore. Not a great product. Not easy to collaborate Lucid - I've used lucid chart before. Its easier to developers to use, but the overall tool has less …
I prefer Miro over all, but then will use certain tools for specific use cases: Lucid - process work Menti - interactive polling and facilitated sessions UserVoice - crowdsourcing Trello - kanban boards (although Miro is pretty good with this too) Slido - live polling and …
Better user experience, more flexible options, and a bigger number of users to participate.
Verified User
Consultant
Chose Miro
Miro is superior around actual presenting, and the features are easier to find and use overall. I think the community is also superior. Lucid Spark was much cheaper and could do 80%, but Miro shines if you are a consultant who wants to leverage the best tools.
Miro works for our organization from a functionality standpoint, as well as having one of the most intuitive user interfaces. Other tools have slightly better teams/board management and administration.
For our use cases, either Miro or Lucid would do the job. However, I find Miro easier to use: with Lucid you have to know some key combinations (e.g.: zooming in or out, dragging objects, or just scrolling your screen) ALso, in a bird's eye view, I found the objects in Miro to …
Lucid made it easier to make process diagrams, but Miro offers more functionality. It's a more versatile product, and it is easier to have all the information in one space.