UserTesting

We let the contract go

I'm very happy with my experience of the product and the level of service and learning resources they provide. If the service becomes more expensive than it currently is then we might not be able to justify additional cost - but this is theoretical. I would recommend UserTesting and would ideally renew our contract.

I'm hoping that the decision comes down to me, because I would love to renew - it just is a matter of if my leadership agrees. Getting buy-in for qualitative testing can be a hurdle.

UserTesting has drastically changed the way we research. We are now conducting research at a scale and pace that would be impossible to replicate using our traditional recruitment methods. Additionally, the ease of sharing information and findings out of UserTesting has made our research more dynamic and engaging to stakeholders. We can't imagine a situation in which we step backwards now that we have demonstrated the expansion capability UserTesting provides to an in-house UX research practice.

The panel is very strong, the interface is easy to learn & use, and the speed of results is unmatched.

We're currently using UserTesting on a pay-as-you-go format where we purchase credits when we get low and use them fluidly to run tests. This format works great for us since our testing cadence waxes and wanes through the phases of any given project. With this low barrier to us using the service, where we can use it as much or as little as we like, it's a no brainer that we would keep buying credits as they come up.