Overall Satisfaction with Adobe Captivate
We use Adobe Captivate to author all of our e-Learning courses. Specifically, we use Adobe Captivate to create SCORM shells that contain multiple slides and videos, and we use it for the interactive assessment options such as interactive video, hot spot assessments, knowledge checks, etc.. We use Adobe Captivate to meet needs for knowledge share, skill training, and behavior leaning.
- Interactivity.
- Assessment.
- Advanced actioning.
- LMS compatibility.
- The asset design is dated.
- Functions are not intuitive for new users.
- Troubleshooting variables, advanced actions, and coding can be challenging.
- Assessment.
- Interactive learning.
- Incorporating videos.
- Advanced actioning.
- Our company works in wireless retail. Users who completed our Adobe Captivate training on the Motorola Edge product were over 130% more likely to sell one or more Motorola Edge devices within the first month of product launch..
I think that Articulate360 is more user-friendly and has a cleaner, more updated look. If you can edit a PDF, then you can use Articulate 360. Adobe Captivate may be more challenging for the designer, but it has more features. We chose Adobe Captivate because we want the option to create interactive learning environments. Adobe Captivate plays well with the other Adobe design products including Photoshop, Illustrator, and Premier. Additionally, Adoe Captivate is highly compatible with Cornerstone, our preferred Learning Management Systems.
Do you think Adobe Captivate delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Adobe Captivate's feature set?
Yes
Did Adobe Captivate live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Adobe Captivate go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Adobe Captivate again?
Yes