ADP ezLaborManager

ADP ezLaborManager

Score 6.7 out of 10
ADP ezLaborManager

Overview

What is ADP ezLaborManager?

ADP's ezLaborManager is a time tracking and attendance offering.
Read more

Recent Reviews

Read all reviews

Reviewer Pros & Cons

View all pros & cons

Video Reviews

Leaving a video review helps other professionals like you evaluate products. Be the first one in your network to record a review of ADP ezLaborManager, and make your voice heard!

Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing

ADP Time and Attendance

Call for details

Cloud

ADP Workforce Now Essential Time

Call for details

Cloud

Entry-level set up fee?

  • Setup fee requiredRequired

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting / Integration Services
Return to navigation

Product Details

What is ADP ezLaborManager?

ADP ezLaborManager® is a time tracking and attendance solution that includes technology as well as ADP experts to help get the system up and running with minimal disruption to the user's business. It aims to be a complete “punch-to-paycheck” service that delivers fast, flexible, secure and accurate time collection.

ADP ezLaborManager is hosted in the cloud by ADP in one of the vendor's industry-leading secure data centers. With no software to install or additional computer hardware to maintain, all users need to get started is an Internet connection and Web browser.

ADP ezLaborManager is available with ADP's leading Human Capital Management (HCM) suites for small and medium-sized businesses - RUN powered by ADP and ADP Workforce Now. Users have a single login, a consistent experience across applications and as single mobile app. According to the vendor, HR practitioners have the convenience of simplified payroll processing and more accurate and timely collection and approval of timecards.



ADP ezLaborManager Features

  • Supported: Time and attendance tracking
  • Supported: Employee scehduling
  • Supported: Mobile time and schedules
  • Supported: Reporting and analytics
  • Supported: Integration with HCM suites

ADP ezLaborManager Screenshots

Screenshot of Simple and quick time reportingScreenshot of Intuitive and easy schedulesScreenshot of Flexible and convenient time collection

ADP ezLaborManager Competitors

ADP ezLaborManager Technical Details

Deployment TypesSoftware as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based
Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationApple iOS, Android, Windows Phone, Blackberry, Mobile Web

Frequently Asked Questions

ADP's ezLaborManager is a time tracking and attendance offering.

Paycom, Paycor, and QuickBooks Time are common alternatives for ADP ezLaborManager.

Reviewers rate Support Rating highest, with a score of 8.1.

The most common users of ADP ezLaborManager are from Mid-sized Companies (51-1,000 employees).

ADP ezLaborManager Customer Size Distribution

Consumers0%
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)50%
Mid-Size Companies (51-500 employees)50%
Enterprises (more than 500 employees)0%
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews

(1-9 of 9)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
We use ADP Workforce Now for our U.S.-based employees and overall for reporting and information storing ADP is better. However, the customer service of ezLaborManager may be a little better. Also the sister program to process payroll at work is light years ahead of Workforce Now.
Adam Kasten, PHR | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
ADP exLaborManager - I prefer ADP over the Paycor and Aon Hewitt timecard applications. This software was more user friendly, had easier access, reporting, and tracking hours than the others I have used. I am not saying the others are horrible, just that ADP was more simplistic to use and administer than the others.
August 11, 2016

ADP EZ Labor Review

Lucy Franco Andrade | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Cost and time spent on implementation were factors. ADP is reputable as well. Concerns were costs are high and extra modules that should be part of the standard are high.
Return to navigation