Amazon Route 53

Highly affordable and cost effective.

We get domain registration under same account.

Reduces workload.

Affordable and Manageable Tool

Great Customer Service

Provides Time to Time Updates and Offers

With Amazon Route 53, we now fully manage all infrastructure as code, from DNS to microservices

We don't need to spend time on integration with existing AWS services

by providing a highly available and scalable DNS service that can improve the availability, scalability, and performance of the organization's applications. This can lead to increased customer satisfaction, reduced costs associated with managing and scaling infrastructure, and increased revenue.

Since we started using Route 53, we saved a lot of time that we used to spend setting routes.

Positive ROI given it is fairly inexpensive and provides an important DNS role for our firm

Greatly simplified deployment of 100's of domains

At the price they charge, it pays off fast over all other alternatives

High uptime lead to stable infrastructure and hence a higher customer NPS.

By configuring the right network topologies internally we can build a highly secure network.

The global presence and POP's allow us to serve traffic from 30+ countries with low latencies.

when our primary DNS provider went down, aws served as a backup and thus minimized the business impact

its working great for more than 7-8 years which is great

High Available DNS service

Cross Account DNS service is not possible

Cross region/Filter based traffic routing

Always giving us ability to improve our work

All of our brand domain names (about 80 brands) are managed in there

Many non marketing or brand domains are also in there

There isn't any defined ROI because it's such a trivial and necessary service with impacts all business operations

Customer trust/reliability and responsiveness

Ability to access more information (helpful for pooling analytics)

Amazon Route 53 had a positive impact because it saves time and money creating simple web sites.

It is a good option to test or test play projects.

Improved Reliability

Made Red/Green deployments a possibility

Improved our lookup time for our website

Route 53 has saved me a lot of time with managing DNS for clients' domains.

Route 53 does things that normal registrar DNS can't, allowing us to better serve customers.

Route 53 helps us avoid downtime on our websites quite regularly.

Domain registration and all the other services are used from Route 53, you will be able to get the cost cut from Amazon.

I would totally go with AWS Route 53 due to its security postures with which it comes with, this can be big deal.

As everyone know, Route 53 is paid service, so when you are an organization with many Accounts and use cases of AWS services. All your billing of your organization can be bundled in one, in this case you can minimize the tracking of bills separately also Amazon will be able to give more competitive cost plan, so your Route 53 cost will also be reduced.

Faster than before

No need to wait on the old partner to open a ticket to change

The cost in terms of time and money of using Route53 is near 0, so the ROI will be driven by whatever expenses you're incurring from your other DNS services.

DNS is just one of those basic components of existing on the web; It's not particularly tied to a business objective beyond existing in the first place-- you MUST use a DNS provider. Route 53 is a good default choice.

Manage all of your infrastructure in one place if you use AWS services. Saves time.

Good integration with AWS services.

Not necessarily cost-effective, depends on your usage. Check what you can get using other services and their price.

Quicker deployments.

Programmatic naming conventions.

It's helped us to better manage DNS and any servers or systems that we have entries for. It has given greater visibility to what we have and how it's managed.

Kept our domains running, no issues with downtime or affecting our end customers.

Enabled us to save time running static websites via routing a domain to an S3 Bucket.

With various time to live settings, we're able to make DNS changes and have them go live pretty quickly.

Allowed flexibility with our web apps, giving us routing and failover options that could be customized to a satisfying degree.

Took a long time to migrate off of when we moved some of our web applications to Azure; would've been preferable to simply switch the url endpoints instead of transferring the domain name itself.

Reduced cost of management -- The Route 53 servers are managed by Amazon, so there is no need to have additional staff to manage and secure DNS servers.

Low cost to run -- Route 53 is very cost effective, and overall spend is based on the amount of DNS traffic generated each month.