Filter Ratings and Reviews
Filter 281 vetted Arena PLM and QMS reviews and ratings
Reviews (1-25 of 167)
- Revision Control - keeps things in check to ensure that right files are always being used.
- Easy User Interface - anyone can use it, even from a non-technical background.
- User Access control - easy to segregate between types of users to allow access to certain things.
- Workflow - would be nice to have an automated workflow to remind people to approve things or enter decisions (e.g. in ECOs and Requests)
- More customization - some templates are locked down and have to use certain fields, without the ability to change or remove them when making templates (e.g. in the Quality world when making a RMA template)
- Having partners and suppliers be part of ECOs throughout their lifecycle
- Sharing procedures and documents in real-time anywhere at any time
- Provide a secure area for our documents and designs
- Ease of use and support
- Some mass edit features could be added, such as changing suppliers in sourcing for all affected parts when a semiconductor company acquires another company but keeps the same part numbers...currently parts need to be changed individually.
- Arena allows for easy customization and this is beneficial because the company can set up the PLM to meet their specific needs and tailor it to their business.
- The interface is very user friendly and this helps to eliminate the apprehension of using a system for an employee who is not a computer expert.
- Policies and user groups allow administrators to control what certain employees can and cannot see. This control keeps data accuracy intact and helps to create a structured approach to data acquisition.
- It is difficult to move from the demo environment to the live environment when setting up the system. The data can be transferred but the specific configurations cannot.
- There seems to be so many options to customize configurations with the exception of notifications. It would be nice to be able to modify the automated notifications that users receive in certain cases (add additional employees to notifications, etc.).
- The Quality world, in my opinion, is a bit limited in how you can customize it.
- Notifications should be able to be sent to supervisors and other interested parties in the Training world when employees are late in completing their training assignments.
- Feedbacks that result in potential future enhancements have no follow up with the submitter so you never know whether your suggestions will be implemented or not.
- Mostly intuitive menu-driven structure.
- Ability to save a lot of information in a central location.
- Flexibility on how to organize information.
- Sometimes the menu-driven structure requires too many steps and layers, making data entry time consuming or hard to find.
- Customer service could be better. Last time we requested tech support, our sales representative seemed somewhat impatient and uncooperative. Afterwards, we have been avoiding customer support.
- Training workspace should have a large watermark on the screen or something else that makes it evident that you are not working in the official work space. On a few occasions, colleagues, including myself, accidentally signed into training work space without realizing it. I was afraid we lost months of important data.
- An internal,network backup. The cloud based system is usually nice, but we lose access to important i nformation during internet outages. We lose internet about 2 hours a week.
- Change orders
- Quality process
- BOM management
- Multiple clicks to get to some items in quality process
- Slow at loading files and updating those files
- BOMs - very organized, you can see changes from previous BOMs (via the redline system). Parts are linked to their sources, where used, etc.
- Attributes and search - we can call up Design history files for a single customer. During 3rd party audits, our documents are right there, no searching through binders.
- Training program - with the quiz at the end - we now have that quality requirement of "verification of effectiveness."
- Customer service is outstanding. Any time I have a question, a response is provided usually within 4 hours!
- The ticket process - I have not tried it enough to comment on it too much, but when I did try it, it seemed very tedious.
- Easy routing of ECO's along with e-mail notification.
- Nice Dashboard to be able to make searching easier.
- Easy part number creation.
- I would like to see department name next to employee's name.
- I would like to be able to add an attachment to a ECO review, like a e-mail.
- When creating a Supplier I don't want to have to complete the whole supplier fields at one time.
- The new upgrade added a clearer picture in Arena as to how to look for information and View details.
- Arena tends to be slow when using actions.
- Completeness
- Feature set
- Process
- User interface clarity
- Hidden menus, hidden items
- Terminology confusion
- Complexity of use

- Easy navigation and search of documents.
- Display of information.
- ECO process, steps are clear and to the point.
- I'd like to see some functionality that assists the creation and fulfillment of document types based on existing documents. For examples, across our organization the same type of report may be placed in different categories because the creator isn't informed. If there is a way to either compare, search for similar documents based on type when creating a document, this would prevent confusion.
- I'd like the ability to create reports and plans that are directly linked to each other, rather than just by a numbering system. Some sort of link between these two would be easier for traceability.

- Arena does a great job with creating a Bill of Materials and makes it really easy to access that information. It can be presented in many different ways to highlight critical information.
- Arena makes it easy for users to see outstanding action items and to see the progress of a change order or quality process.
- Arena provides a good user interface for training.
- Arena lacks the capability to edit documents within its interface and requires users to upload new versions of documents when changes are made. This makes it a bit more challenging to collect and implement reviewer feedback
- Arena's requirement tracking world does not have the proper functionality we need and was not useful for us.

- Enforcing functional approval to permanent changes to Quality System controlled documents. All affected personnel need to give timely notification and approval for document changes.
- Expediting the progression of a Change Order to a process document change. In the healthcare industry, it is imperative for the time between decisions and changes to be minimized, and Arena accomplishes this well.
- Requiring electronic signatures for submitting and approving changes. Tracking of user changes is important for both the internal record and external auditing purposes.
- The use of multiple workspaces can be more seamless. Sometimes related documents are in different workspaces, and so one must toggle between workspaces to cross-reference documents.
- Navigation of a Change Order can be difficult when saturated with information in Summary, Item, Files, Approvals>Decisions, and History>Status view. A single view can be dense with information and attribute options.
- By default, Notices at the top are enabled and can be distracting or unnecessary after one gets accustomed to the software. Perhaps a simplified view layout could be an option to more experienced users.
- BOM management
- File legacy and revision management
- Product sourcing
- Costing
- More streamlined copying of BOMs.
- Improved linking of sourced components.

- Document control is a strength of Arena. Everyone can always find the most recent revision of a document with ease.
- Arena is easy to customize to your application.
- The user interface is not the most intuitive. There are a lot of different tabs and information in various places that take some time to learn how to navigate.
- The approvals to reopening changes to re-approving are not streamlined, and some changes get lost if there is a rejection.

- Bill of material.
- Quality module - CAPA Workflow.
- Quality module - Risk Management File/Design History File/Device Master Record.
- The reporting interface is fairly weak. We export to Excel to organize and sort the data.
- Linkage could be improved. I'd like to ability to link to closed workflows within the Quality Module.

- Customer service
- Advanced search options
- Revision tracking
- Cleaner UI (more obvious button placement).
- More direct export/download process.
- Revise change order process to make it easier to upload redlines.

- Very robust in creating and maintaining Bills of Materials (BOM).
- Intuitive and easy to use ECO & ECR functions.
- Can keep all the necessary files for an item, including drawings, purchase specs, quotes, etc. in one place.
- The new version is slow in some browsers (I have tested in Opera, and the speed has decreased with the new update).
- There could be an option to review a 3D model inside Arena, instead of having to save a 3D model files and open it in CAD software.
- The interface could be more modern.
- Easy to use
- User-friendly
- Stores a lot of data
- Filter the options
- Search without categories needing to be added
- Link it with NetSuite, so item numbers transfer over
- Integration with SolidWorks
- User-friendly interface
- Saved Searches
- BOM structuring that isn't arbitrarily alphabetic
- Bulk functions through the regular interface, not through imports of .csv
- Access configuration for external supplier users
- Allowing admins to view as other user levels

- Streamline our metrics, so we don't need various spreadsheets and easier to pull real-time data.
- The training function has made tracking completion of training easy and being able to set due dates and revise procedures.
- The Quality function has made performing investigations and CAPAs much easier. Everything is now housed in one place, and notifications/reviews are much quicker.
- The initial learning curve may be quite large for individuals who have never used a QMS system; there can be a lot of functions!
- Something to keep in mind for budget-conscious organizations, licenses may be a bit pricey.
- Lots of ways to configure the process to fit your business needs.
- Implementation has been thorough.
- The ability to get in touch with individual performing implementation has been great and easy.
- Too many options making implementation longer than I had hoped.
- The system is not intuitive for a user. I log in and cannot see exactly what I want to do and where I want to go. Other systems do this better.
- It would be nice to have someone come onsite and train all users.

- Ease of customization and to establish a Quality system
- Excellent customer support
- Easy formatting
- Auto-generate numbers in a pattern
- Templates for BOM creation
- Integration with companies with different Quality system
- T process of creating items and change orders, it is easy to use and very clear.
- Training Videos are very helpful, the help tab is very useful.
- The interface is very clean and easy on the eyes.
- Advanced search is very helpful.
- Drag-and-drop files directly into items.
- When I try to upload a file into an item and press cancel, then try again to add a different file in that same box and press done, the upload is not successful...I would need to delete that box in order for a the upload to work.
- Good repository for controlled documents
- Very steep learning curve
- Not the most user-friendly
- Requires a lot of administrative intervention
- Easy configuration.
- Easy promote links between request and change.
- Easy BOM views and APIs.
- Easy to setup routings.
- Arena Winter training was informative and helped users prepare.
- In the item file upload the click and drag option is not available yet and this is tedious based on user's feedback.
- BOM extended view. When the BOM gets pretty big it takes a longer time to refresh.
- Basic reports should be readily provided off the shelf without running analytics of simple weekly data of the change turn around process and request processing.
Arena PLM and QMS Scorecard Summary
What is Arena PLM and QMS?
Arena, a PTC business, helps companies to design, produce, and deliver innovative products quickly with a unified cloud-based PLM and QMS platform. Arena understands modern product companies rely on distributed teams and global supply chains to develop products, ensure regulatory compliance (FDA, ISO, ITAR, EAR, and environmental compliance), and respond to customer demands.
Arena states that they have more than 1,300 global
high-tech electronics and medical device customers. Companies with complex
products comprised of electrical, mechanical, and software designs need a
single system to collaborate in real-time. Arena enables every participant throughout the entire product lifecycle to work together–increasing visibility and traceability. This accelerates new product development (NPD) and new product introduction (NPI) by streamlining processes, automating review cycles, and reducing errors to increase profitability.
The vendor states that with Arena’s cloud solutions, internal teams and external partners can leverage a comprehensive product development platform to accelerate product launches while reducing expenses, increasing profitability, and speeding the time to market.
Arena PLM and QMS Screenshots
Arena PLM and QMS Videos (2)
Arena PLM and QMS Downloadables
Arena PLM and QMS Integrations
Arena PLM and QMS Competitors
Arena PLM and QMS Pricing
- Has featureFree Trial Available?Yes
- Does not have featureFree or Freemium Version Available?No
- Has featurePremium Consulting/Integration Services Available?Yes
- Entry-level set up fee?Required
Arena offers flexible packages to fit your team’s needs ensuring you get the right capabilities to meet your specific business requirements so you never overpay. Our cloud-based PLM and QMS solutions include role-based subscriptions to meet your diverse team needs with the necessary security to protect your product information. Our fixed-fee QuickStart™ implementations help us deploy rapidly to provide the lowest total cost of ownership.
Arena PLM and QMS Support Options
| Paid Version | |
|---|---|
| Phone | |
| Live Chat | |
| Forum/Community | |
| FAQ/Knowledgebase | |
| Social Media | |
| Video Tutorials / Webinar |
Arena PLM and QMS Technical Details
| Deployment Types: | SaaS |
|---|---|
| Operating Systems: | Unspecified |
| Mobile Application: | No |











