Asana Reviews

Asana is better organized than Basecamp and less visually confusing. It's more user intuitive and clear about what exactly needs to get done and what elements depend on others being executed. Overall, the list and kanban views allow for a more natural, more organized viewing experience, and flexibility in different thinking styles.

Bitrix24 is an excellent tool at a lower cost and can be very powerful. Your processes determine a GREAT deal of which platform you choose to use - which is why it's so important to know them before you begin mapping these out in software. Overall, we have preferred Asana over Bitrix24.

I use Asana in a similar way to how I used Trello at a previous company. Asana is much more feature-rich than Trello. Once I discovered that I can work from boards (the format used by Trello) in Asana, it would be a tough sell to get me to ever switch back.

Basecamp is the most basic of the project management software I have used. It was the first I worked with and it impressed me at the time. The UI isn't very nice. I wouldn't recommend Basecamp over Asana.

We felt Asana had more features and would cost less in the long run than the three above. It was a long process to test drive each on in the beta phase but it resulted in us being able to make a better decision.

Asana stack over its various major competitors as its costing is quite under budget. The support to user is 24 x 7 and call centers available. The mail reply within 24 hours. Apart from it its user community is quite big and helps in the system to grow. It is widely accepted in world wide.

Cost and the lowest ramp-up time is always factored in while still meeting the needs of a very fast-paced environment. Asana has more capability than Trello or ClickUp and is a more visual tool than JIRA.

Bugzilla also has a free version but is slightly difficult to customize. Would need someone from your team to administer it at regular intervals.

Ease of use and access are what initially put Asana ahead of other options available. We have stuck with Asana because of the flexibility in solving a variety of challenges that would otherwise fall to a spreadsheet or piles of paper, and the load it has taken off of the team when managing projects.

I didn't select Asana.

Both software are very similar to each other, even in the economic factor, the reason we choose Asana over the others is because of its usability, the software is very easy to use which helps to get the most out of it, in addition to the integrations that provide Asana with other devices is greater than these.

We all hated Trello...

Asana is fast, better user experience. Easy to manage between the projects and the team.

TOPdesk is more suited for Technical and Service environments. Asana is basic but more user-friendly.

file sharing and emails

We ended up moving to Zendesk because we switched ticketing systems and Zendesk has the same functionality that Asana has. We would have stayed on Asana had Zendesk not had the same functions.

Microsoft Teams was a bit easier to use and more intuitive. It was easier to manage groups and documents when we could share them with the team, with multiple versions being uploaded at a time during a project. However, the integration with the rest of our infrastructure was difficult, so thats why we went with Asana.

The only reason that we shifted to Asana from Trello because it was hard to manage big project on Trello because on Trello there were different stages and it was really hard to manage hundered of tasks their different stages on Trello. It is simple on Asana to effectively manage it

I haven't used any other products like Asana. This was what I was introduced to in our working group and we have never had to look for a better alternative! I have heard about other products like Basecamp and Wunderlist, for example, but I have never had to use them instead of Asana.

A few of our other teams at the office use these other programs and they work great for them! However, as a team that is trying to integrate two parallel services, it's incredibly important for us to have visibility into what the others are doing at a high level. This helps managers cut down on micro-managing while still being able to see what's going on.

While Asana is perhaps the best product for simple task management, I think competitors such as KiSSFLOW and KACE are better designed for a progressive workflow. If you can hand off a task to one person and be done with it, for example, Asana a great. If you need a customized workflow that automatically routes through multiple team members, however, Asana may not be your best option.

Asana and Trello are two comparable products in the task management realm. They both provide a user interface that can be difficult to figure out at first. We used both Trello and Asana but came to realization that Asana was the easier to manage and view, especially for both departments.

Asana is easy and intuitive to use. It is a simpler product, if your project fits, Asana will be the tool to use.

I view Asana as a lightweight PM tool, more for task management and collaboration.

Workamajig builds timelines and in Asana you have to do it manually. It would be great if we could build templates to see what days we will need certain projects by.

I think the user interface is much better and easier to navigate.