Skip to main content
TrustRadius
Canon MPS

Canon MPS

Overview

What is Canon MPS?

Canon offers managed print services.

Read more
Recent Reviews
Read all reviews
Return to navigation

Product Details

What is Canon MPS?

Canon MPS Technical Details

Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(9)

Attribute Ratings

Reviews

(1-1 of 1)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Canon MPS is the best solution for the proper management of the printing environment in an organization. Because it provides the information need to understand the current state of our print environment, to improve the performance and also it enables us to make better decisions about the future. So, we have been using it for two years now. And I have a pleasant experience with it. Therefore, I can surely say it is one of the best print management systems for everyone to use.
  • It makes and keeps records about all the work which are done by that system.
  • It helps us to make better decisions and manage the resources that we have.
  • The dashboard is full if information and managing and monitoring can be done easily.
  • For different jobs cost can be calculated separately.
  • Reporting and alerting features should be improved.
  • New user should have some idea before starting to use this service.
It is hard to manage a printing environment in a large organization. With the use of Canon MPS, we can maintain the print environment easily. It has helped to improve our whole printing experience.
  • Canon MPS has helped to reduce our printing cost dramatically.
  • Now we can manage the print environment easily without using lots of staff.
Canon has an excellent reputation for printers. Also, their consulting and marketing team were excellent. Besides, we got a recommendation from other people.
There support team is excellent. Always willing to help us, something goes wrong.

Return to navigation