Cisco Aironet 2800 Series Access Points

Cisco Aironet 2800 Series Access Points

About TrustRadius Scoring
Score 8.1 out of 100
Cisco Aironet 2800 Series Access Points

Overview

Recent Reviews

School District and Cisco WiFi

9 out of 10
November 14, 2021
The Cisco Aironet [2800 Series] Access Points are deployed across the whole school district, in approximately 70 sites. This solution has …
Continue reading
Read all reviews

Reviewer Pros & Cons

View all pros & cons

Video Reviews

Leaving a video review helps other professionals like you evaluate products. Be the first one in your network to record a review of Cisco Aironet 2800 Series Access Points, and make your voice heard!

Pricing

View all pricing
N/A
Unavailable

What is Cisco Aironet 2800 Series Access Points?

The Cisco Aironet 2800 Series Access Points is 802.11ac Wave 2 compliant and supports multiuser MIMO (MU-MIMO).

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting / Integration Services

Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?

Features Scorecard

No scorecards have been submitted for this product yet..

Product Details

What is Cisco Aironet 2800 Series Access Points?

The Cisco Aironet 2800 Series Access Points is 802.11ac Wave 2 compliant and supports multiuser MIMO (MU-MIMO).

Cisco Aironet 2800 Series Access Points Technical Details

Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo

Frequently Asked Questions

The Cisco Aironet 2800 Series Access Points is 802.11ac Wave 2 compliant and supports multiuser MIMO (MU-MIMO).

Reviewers rate Performance highest, with a score of 8.6.

The most common users of Cisco Aironet 2800 Series Access Points are from Mid-sized Companies (51-1,000 employees) and the Government Administration industry.

Comparisons

View all alternatives

Compare with

Reviews

(1-20 of 20)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Umair Ali Khan | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
D-Link Wireless access points and D-Link Wireless controllers were being used in our organization previously. They were working well with a small number of users. But as we started to expand wireless coverage and the user base started to grow they became less efficient and frequent disconnection and low-speed issues were faced.
Cisco Aironet Access points overcome these issues and have been working great in our environment.
Mark McCully | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We looked at the Aruba Wireless Access Points as well as the Cisco APs, but we settled on the Cisco Aironet 2800 Series Access Points because they were more cost effective and we have more familiarity with the Cisco line of network products and how to manage them.
Luis Felipe Campa Macias | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
Por la confianza en la marca cisco, por las capacidades de las controladoras 2400 y 5500, asi como la disponibilidad de soporte, información y de productos durante un RMA o incidente.

For the trust in the Cisco brand, for the capabilities of the 2400 and 5500 controllers, as well as the availability of support, information, and products during a RMA or incident.


Axel David Olivares Hernández | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
The manufacturing quality of the access point is superior with Cisco even if the environment where you are going to deploy the access point is clean and is a perfect building. It's better to ensure every kind of scenarios where you can encounter dangers to your infrastructure. I have used another brand like Rukus and the manufacturing quality sometimes seems like a toy I don't like that.
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
I tested Aerohive in my previous company and I think the killer feature was the cloud controller and also that every AP can work independently from the controller. At the end we didn't change the vendor. Then I just evaluated Meraki, that it's really plug and play, but with no real possibility for customization.
Jonathan Cabestel | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We made our purchase decision based on Cisco access points being airthight and all others we reviewed were not, while reading product features it looks like fast roaming is also only really supported at Cisco so after we found those two features we stopped looking for alternatives, time is money and the time spent while deciding what to buy could be even more expensive than the product itself
Edwin Sandys | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We did explore an alternate path for wireless which caused more grief than good, which is why we returned back to Cisco. Since taking things through wireless controllers, we could not be happier.
Aldo Adrián Ramírez Vázquez | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Reseller
Review Source
The brands I mentioned, have a lot of pros and cons, however, I love Aironet because of it having mobility express. No one else has this solution and it's the easiest web GUI. The graphical interface, the reports, analitycs and the integrations with other solutions from Cisco and 3rd party, makes it the perfect choise.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
Motorola started up very well but they quickly fell into a pattern of "this is what we know and we will stick to it." Cisco on the other hand, keeps improving with new solutions and firmware to keep improving roaming.
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
The Cisco Aironet Access Points stack up well against the others that were in consideration to help with our organization's goals. The main criteria taken into considering which option to move forward with was 1. Compatibility 2. Ease of Use 3. Setup 4. Cost. The access point seemed to check off all the boxes while eliminating dead spots within the office.