December 13, 2019
Score 9 out of 10
Currently we use Cisco Aironet and Catalyst 1850 in implementations with small and medium-sized clients, to help them cover areas where the wireless is unstable or there is a weak signal. This product has been used in small areas such as a room or an office, as well as in large areas such as an amusement park, in that aspect it is a very flexible and reliable product.
- Connect Users via Wireless
- Flexibility by not requiring a physical controller.
- It´s a little bit expensive compared with other brands.
- If you don´t have PoE in your switches you nedd adquire a Power Adapter o Power injector.
Read Benjamín Marrón Rojas's full review
The Access points of the 1850 series are well implemented in small or medium-sized companies where, just by buying the required access points, you can put them to work. That is, they do not need a physical controller to manage them since a single access point can provide administration up to 25 more. You can also configure another AP to act as redundancy of the master, in the event that the master disconnects the backup will enter and take its role.