Cisco ASA Reviews

176 Ratings
<a href='' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.1 out of 100

Do you work for this company? Learn how we help vendors

TrustRadius Top Rated for 2020

Overall Rating

Reviewer's Company Size

Last Updated

By Topic




Job Type


Reviews (1-25 of 54)

Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why.
January 13, 2021
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 4 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
Our Cisco ASA firewall was being used at a remote location for site to site VPN and client VPN capabilities. It was used primarily by site users so they could work from home.
  • It's using the same interface that has been used for years. Most technicians have worked with it in the past.
  • Run under extreme conditions without failing.
  • We were using some older hardware. The interface is dated - while it run does run very steady it's not up to the standards you see with other vendors.
  • Complex configuration for setting up redundancy (active/active)
[Well suited for] small sites that don't require many features. The higher-end ASAs are very expensive and you are better off looking at alternative products. Cisco has a big problem ahead if they don't start pricing similar to other vendors.
Read this authenticated review
February 12, 2020
Fraser Clark | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 6 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We use a pair of Cisco ASAs in an active/standy pair as our internal firewalls. To segment traffic between VLANs. It is used across the entire organisation. The main concern it addresses is of course security and only allowing users to get to resources that they are allowed to go to and have a reason for going to.
  • HA Failover - very fast and no downtime.
  • Documentation.
  • GUI - Dated and requires specific java versions to run.
  • Missing out on layer 7 inspection.
If inter-VLAN routing and VLAN segmentation is all that is needed for a business then Cisco ASA does this job very well.
For more complex needs such as layer 7 packet inspection I would recommend a different product such as a Palo-Alto or Fortinet device.
The support is usually very good and gets back to you very quickly. However I had some instances of when two engineers will give me wildly different answers to what I thought was a simple question. Overall however I do rate the support highly and they are generally always very good.
Read Fraser Clark's full review
January 15, 2020
Steve Davis | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Review Source
Cisco ASA was used at the organization I was employed in. Also, I deployed it to several companies as a VAR. Cisco ASA was deployed as a standalone product, as well as in an HA environment for reliability. Cisco ASA was used as an edge firewall for organizations in all environments; it was deployed.
  • Cisco ASA has a variety of features including NextGen to protect corporate networks.
  • Cisco ASA is easy to deploy and manage.
  • Multi-WAN routing could use improvement. Currently, Cisco routers are needed in front of the ASA to accommodate.
  • NextGen features such as FirePOWER can be difficult to deploy.
Cisco ASA is well suited in most environments. They have a model that is sized for all situations from a small, medium, or large corporations, to datacenters. For smaller businesses on a budget, it may not be the first pick due to cost. However, it is an excellent investment to make if you can.
Cisco ASA does a great job. The only tricky aspect of being an experienced engineer is having to sit through Tier1 support. Most of the questions and steps they request have already been done if you know what you are doing. An experienced engineer will benefit from getting past tier 1 (this is true of all support staff typically). A customer that is supporting their own device, or less experienced engineer, is well suited to have Cisco ASA as a resource from tier1 and up.
Read Steve Davis's full review
January 09, 2020
Robert Ross | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
Our Cisco ASA's act as our perimeter gateways for our corporate offices. We also have our two largest sites outside of our headquarters using the devices to connect via a VPN. This allows for access to corporate information housed on storage area networks based in the corporate data centers
  • Fits into Cisco's ecosystem seamlessly.
  • Advanced features to adapt to today's world.
  • The GUI could use an update and is clumsy, still, after all this time.
  • Network Access Control integration still needs to be improved.

The Cisco IOS Firewall provides an extensive set of security features that allow administrators to design customized security solutions to tailor to the specific needs of their organization. The Cisco IOS Firewall is comprised of the following functions and technologies:

  • Cisco IOS Stateful Packet Inspection
  • Context-Based Access Control
  • Intrusion Prevention System
  • Authentication Proxy
  • Port-to-Application Mapping
  • Network Address Translation
  • Zone-Based Policy Firewall
  • Cisco IOS Stateful Packet Inspection
Cisco TAC is not great but there are partners who can take it forward and level it up.
Read Robert Ross's full review
December 02, 2019
Simone Duarte | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
Cisco ASA is a next generation firewall that I have used and managed for almost 2 years. It is robust equipment that is positioned on the edge to protect from virtual attack, and it also makes web content filtering to block access to undue pages from certain sectors in the company. Two units were purchased at each branch.
  • Encryption and security
  • Deep web content filtering and data analysis
  • Antivirus, IPS and anti-spam
  • Support is a little expensive
  • Manuals are only in English
The Cisco ASA that I managed at my branch office were two ASA 5515-X units. One as main and the other as failover. I put on the edge to make the filter and protect the internal network. In just one appliance, it enables web content filtering, application viewing, Anti-virus, Anti-Spam and IPS services features.
Top grade for being happy with the product I'm using and managing. I have never had any serious problems with the Cisco ASA. I have nothing to complain about from this Next generation Cisco firewall. It is a great product, reliable, with great performance, and offers excellent support, if the customer needs help.
Read Simone Duarte's full review
October 04, 2019
Jyrki Halonen | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We are using a Cisco ASA firewall in front of our SDN data centre network to form first line protection against the Internet. We automate all our configurations to this platform with other Cisco tools and ASA fits fine to this zero touch day 2 operation model.
  • Well suited to automated operation/configuration
  • Well known technology
  • Price
  • Basic features ok, but NGFW features could be better
[Well suited] to an environment where other Cisco products are also used.
We haven't used support functions too much for this platform so can't really rate ASA focused support. However I rated over all Cisco support against our environments and it has been working quite well for the many platforms we have in our environment. The quality, speed and results have been at a good level.
Read Jyrki Halonen's full review
December 17, 2019
Derek Benson | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 5 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
ASA was being used as our perimeter firewall before being replaced by an NGFW. All traffic and client VPNs terminated at this device. It has addressed the most basic needs of firewalling and routing but does not address next-generation features.
  • Routing.
  • Port-based firewalling.
  • I would ditch the ASA in favor of an NGFW like a Palo Alto. Port-based firewalling doesn't have a place in today's world.
  • The interface is clunky.
Cisco ASA is good enough for basic firewalling when you know exactly what you need to allow or block, but today's threats are more complex than just the ASA alone can handle without bolting on other products like Firepower.
Cisco support has always treated me well. The engineers generally know the product well enough to help with issues that arise.
Read Derek Benson's full review
July 19, 2019
Jeffrey Thoenen | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We use Cisco ASA across our whole enterprise network. We use them to protect our local LANs to support PCI compliance and to protect any internet-facing circuits.
  • Cisco ASAs are simple to configure and manage.
  • Cisco ASAs allow easy setup of VPNs.
  • Cisco ASAs provide secure segmentation to offer compliance with PCI.
  • The CLI commands of the ASA is a bit different than Cisco's IOS devices.
Cisco allows easy configuration of VPNs to various vendors that need access to your internal networks. Make sure to size the ASA correctly for the application, as it has various supported throughput speeds according to the model.
Read Jeffrey Thoenen's full review
January 10, 2020
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
Our Cisco ASA's are the firewalls for our entire enterprise, so in a sense, they're used by the whole organization. However, only IT manages and monitors them, so it would also be fair to say it's used by one department in that sense. All businesses, no matter the size, need to have a firewall. Cyber attacks are a significant problem in the world, and a safe, secure, up-to-date firewall is a critical piece of securing a business's data.
  • Security: The Cisco ASA does security well, with all the standard port blocking and filtering, as well as for analytics with the Firepower module.
  • VPN: Cisco AnyConnect allows remote users an easy way to connect into the network securely. It also has site-to-site VPN capabilities that let us seamlessly link sites.
  • Learning Curve: While there is ample documentation available, it takes a lot of time, training, and experience to understand and manage an Cisco ASA firewall.
  • Cost: Cisco ASAs can get very expensive, most of that cost in support contracts rather than hardware. And since they don't support sales on the secondary market, there's little choice.
Every business that does anything at all with the Internet needs a firewall. And while Cisco ASA is not the cheapest option, they are one of the best. They're the industry standard for a reason. Constant updates to patch new issues or attacks, lots of documentation, and fantastic support make them well worth the cost. That said, if the price is just too prohibitive for a small business, there are alternatives, and I would rather see those in place than no firewall at all.
I have only had to call Cisco support a few times on the ASAs, but they were fast in identifying the issue and worked with me to resolve it quickly. After the fact, they took the time to explain the problem so I could learn from the experience, which is not something many support lines bother to do. It is expensive, though.
Read this authenticated review
December 13, 2019
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We have multiple clustered and nonclustered ASA appliances with various models and configurations. It mostly used on the edge and for other internal purposes such as a transparent firewall. We also use firepower in this new -X ASAs as our primary IPS on the internet edge. This allows us to not have extra devices in line before or after the firewalls.
  • Rules management.
  • Failover cluster.
  • Software bugs.
  • Inconsistent TAC support.
With multiple models for every situation, it's hard to say where specifically this is suitable. We use it at SOHO offices as well as for large corporate needs based on the models. They have also expanded to new appliances as well with even more choices to accommodate all possible situations. The 5506-X makes for a great all-purpose firewall that can be deployed inline and such.
Lately, Cisco TAC support is lacking behind. There have been issues and instances where generic answers such as "upgrade" are being used to close the case, but with proper escalation and good Cisco Sales team, this can be over hurdled. Escalation is the key to getting proper and great support.
Read this authenticated review
May 21, 2019
Steven Van Jaarsveld | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Review Source
Cisco ASA is used internally by our organization's IT department to secure the perimeter edge. We also use Cisco ASA in our lab to do testings of multiple client scenarios. We sell Cisco ASA to customers and implement Cisco ASA as well for customers in a project environment. It addresses network security issues on the perimeter and sometimes even in the data centre, however, Cisco Firepower appliances are more well-suited to this implementation.
  • SSL VPN.
  • Site-to-Site VPN.
  • Ease of use and configuration.
  • Easy CLI.
  • Robust.
  • Easy to troubleshoot.
  • ASDM ease-of-use could be improved.
  • Upgrade/migration from previous versions and the way objects are named.
  • Bring in more support contexts in the default licensing.
  • Bring in more support for SSL VPN connections in the default licensing.
Cisco ASA is well suited for customer scenarios where a customer does not need or want next-gen features and only needs legacy firewalling functionality. Cisco ASA is less appropriate in situations where a customer requires next-gen features and network segmentation. In this scenario, a customer should investigate the option of Cisco Firepower appliances running the Firepower threat defense software.
Read Steven Van Jaarsveld's full review
May 13, 2019
George Venianakis | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
Cisco ASA is being used in a department addressing the protection of several critical aspects. It is being used along with firepower in order to streamline the level of security needed.
  • Zero downtime upgrades.
  • Consistent API interface.
  • Rich feature set.
  • The GUI (ASDM) should get rid of Java.
  • API specifications and commands lack proper documentation.
  • Deeper regression testing on later releases.
Ease of deployment for almost all scenarios, a rich feature set, excellent product and technical support with tons of config examples, and integration with Cisco Umbrella.
Read George Venianakis's full review
May 09, 2019
Dalibor Cvetanovic | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We use the ASA as a firewall, intrusion prevention, and VPN in the whole organization. Basically it's a proactive threat defense that stops attacks before they spread through the network.
  • We Can use multiple contexts or also known as Firewall multimode.
  • Ability to use dynamic routing protocols.
  • The complex way of connecting external connectivity.
  • Would like more SLA and event manager functionality.
  • GUI interface is lacking. The interface is java specific.
  • Positive: VPN functionality with the ease of setup and security. Being a Cisco shop, this proved to be more cost-effective with less need of multiple experts in-house.
  • Negative: the inability to use VPN while in multimode. Would prefer a single entry point with load balancing.
Read Dalibor Cvetanovic's full review
April 21, 2019
Tom Erdman | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We use our Cisco ASA as a traditional firewall, inspecting and routing traffic. We also have Firepower running on it, which allows us to use it for content filtering.
  • The ASA has been around forever, and has been proven to be a great firewall solution.
  • ASAs are very versatile, running everything from VPNs and ACLs to content filtering.
  • Running them in tangent with other Cisco routing solutions allows for a very diverse and secure setup.
  • There are two types of technologists: ones who speak Cisco, and ones who don't. The ASA is no different from any Cisco device, in that it comes with a learning curve.
  • These aren't consumer products, and they come with an enterprise price tag.
  • Like many vendors, Cisco uses a java based admin consoles. This is its own special form of torture.
Anyone running traffic through a business needs a firewall solution, and the ASA is a great one if you have the funds and expertise. We especially appreciate the Firepower solution for filtering and malware protection.
Read Tom Erdman's full review
February 04, 2019
Wouter Hindriks | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We deploy the CIsco ASA 5505 & 5506 on over 250 customers' sites to protect the local LAN and establish a site-to-site VPN to our datacenter from which we host the customer applications. On our datacenter, we use an HA pair of ASA 5585s to produce redundant internet access and NAT all traffic.
  • Easy to configure with a template and CLI.
  • TACACS command authorization and accounting is must have for compliance.
  • Good SNMP monitoring options.
  • Well developed and very compatible firewall OS.
  • The 'Next Generation' options feel bolted on and the performance is underwhelming.
  • Impact of enabling the Firepower Inspection is too big. Both response time and throughput suffered horribly.
Excellent layer 1-4 firewall, HA works flawless, great performance for classic firewall.

For Next Gen features you had better look at the firepower threat defense devices, as the next generation features of ASA are not well integrated.
Read Wouter Hindriks's full review
July 09, 2019
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We've deployed ASAs throughout our multiple datacenters and we also use them as onsite edge devices at many of our client sites. We're using them for NATing client devices as well as applying stringent ACLs to control what clients can access on our networks and what we can access on a clients network.
  • HA NAT
  • ACLS
  • HA
  • VPN
  • Maybe this has changed, but our ASAs were/are limited ACLs based on Object-Groups/IPs/Ports versus our Palo Altos offer application layer inspection to make sure that traffic traversing the firewall on a specific well known port such as 22 is actually SSH traffic or that traffic on port 80/443 is actually HTTP/HTTPS.
They work fairly well for firewalling and tended to be lower cost than our Palo Altos. If you're looking for a decent firewall and cost is a concern I'd say ASAs are a decent option. If you'e looking for a more secure environment you might want to look at the Palo Altos in addition to or instead of the ASAs.
Read this authenticated review
June 12, 2019
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
Cisco ASA is used to filter access to very specific networks that need isolation from the rest of the information system. Our requirements were to have a good level of security, along with enough flexibility so that we could address unpredictable changes in the feature set that the admins of those networks may demand in the future.
  • Manageability.
  • Deployment.
  • Security.
  • Set of features apart from simple stateful filtering.
  • Performance.
  • Clustering.
  • Scalability once setup if you don't go for clustering.
Cisco ASA is well suited for situations where you have a short set of rules but need many features that enhance the filtering. For instance, if you have to isolate a network within your information system, in order to give ownership of that specific network to another team, and still have a lot of flexibility on how you interact with that network and your main site network, this is one good way to go.
You can even give access to the other team for monitoring purposes and helping with debugs.
Read this authenticated review
January 18, 2019
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We have about a dozen Cisco ASA models deployed from 5505-5545. We use them to separate traffic between internal organizations, for DMZ, and for VPN (both IPSEC and SSL). The problems these units address are two-fold: to protect our internal network from foreign networks that we have no control over, and to protect the foreign networks from the chance of getting infected by something on our internal network.
  • When sized appropriately, it can handle demanding traffic well.
  • Cisco is pretty good about putting out security-related updates so we can rest assured that the networks can be as safe as possible.
  • The hardware is very reliable and I don't recall any hardware related issues in the 5+ years of using them.
  • Software upgrades are smooth and I would recommend getting Cisco support assistance for them to review your current configuration and have them advise which stable and secure version you should move to. They may provide additional commands to enter prior to upgrading if you are moving from a very old version of the software.
  • Reporting, especially for VPN functionality, could use some improvements to be able to pinpoint when particular users log in/out.
  • The JAVA-based GUI could use some modernization. I currently have to use an older version of JAVA JRE to run the ASDM.
  • Some of the licensing structure could use some simplifying. You really have to size the appliance for growth before purchasing the initial license. The bare-bones license doesn't provide much flexibility.
DMZ firewall, general internet browsing, VPN (SSL and IPSEC). ASA can handle many firewall rules without slowing down. Some of them also offer PoE on the switchports of the firewall, which is convenient for small home office installations. One of the features is a high availability configuration in an active/standby mode. You can upgrade the software without any downtime.
Read this authenticated review
January 25, 2019
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We use Cisco ASA at the headquarters and the sites to build our cross-network and edge gateway. Like always, Cisco rocks with their hardware, no issues at all. Even better now with the Cloud services, Cisco pushes down updates to the ASA blocking potential threads.
  • Rock solid when it comes to VPN Site-to-Site.
  • Excellent Firewall functionalities.
  • HA capabilities, it never fails.
  • It would be better if Cisco continues improving the ASDM for new administrators starting their networking career.
  • It would be great if Cisco builds a management web interface like they do for small business products.
I don't know why an IT department would not consider a Cisco ASA.
Read this authenticated review
October 18, 2018
Larry Chisholm | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
The Cisco ASA platform has become the standard which I use for most of my SOHO and enterprise setups. I most recently have used this as a buffer between an AWS environment and a production network, where it behaved flawlessly. A second use case was as a VPN concentrator to consolidate all client to site, and site to site VPN connectivity, where it again behaved admirably.
  • Top of the line crypto, and firepower inline makes threat management easy.
  • easy to set up vpn, now including tunnel interfaces!
  • SOLID infrastructure for client to site vpn with anyconnect
  • TCO is higher than most.
  • firepower integration into the appliance is straightforward but weak. Units often times cannot process the amount of traffic thrown at them.
  • Support can be painful to work with at times. Need more english speaking staff.
Places where this product is well suited -
* VPN Functionality - Client to Site/Site to Site
* Internet Edge Gateway - NAT/PAT providing internet access to staff/production networks
* Interior firewall - Network segmentation
Read Larry Chisholm's full review
November 05, 2018
Carlos Daniel Casañas Bertolo ஃ | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We use it in several critical access and control points, both internal and external. With it we deploy the VPNs that interlace all our offices and authorized consultants for remote access.Together with other tools of the same brand, automated rules are established that allow a more effective control of cybersecurity inside and outside the company.

  • Excellent integration with several systems and equipment of other brands, as well as with the entire Cisco ecosystem.
  • Very good support and attention from the company and its associates. Constant security updates and functionalities.
  • Robust and reliable equipment, great flexibility in configurations and fully scalable in power and functionalities to the need of the company.
  • Well, the price is always an important factor with this brand, but I am witnessing that it is worth what it costs, although the ROI is generally not as good as the investors would like it to be.
  • The virtual appliance still consumes too many resources compared to similar ones and I have to assign physical network cards to get an adequate performance when implementing it.
Implementing an ASA is not advisable for a small business with a tight budget for IT. To get the juice you must be willing to invest in licenses and maintain the support contract to continue receiving updates. In the medium term you will be satisfied, but in the meantime I am sure that the finance manager is not going to be your best friend. Now, if you are looking for stability, performance, redundancy in communications, security at all levels and you want to keep all your branches properly interconnected, ASA is your smartest choice.
Read Carlos Daniel Casañas Bertolo ஃ's full review
October 17, 2018
Richard Oberle | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Review Source
We use Cisco ASA units for internal remote users to remain connected to our network for access to applications, file shares and corporate email. We also recommend and sell ASA units to customers for use in their networks. Lastly, we recommend and sell ASA units to customers that we host for various applications, so that they can have access to "cloud" based apps but also be as secure as possible in the access thereof.
  • ASA units provide firewall capabilities that would normally be found in much more expensive equipment
  • ASA units provide POE capability for use with VOIP phones or other equipment.
  • ASA units connect outside internet to inside networks and VPN's with very little overhead and no loss of signal speed.
  • ASA units allow me to run a wireless access point in parallel so that both wired and wireless devices can share one DHCP scope which makes it easier to manage and maintain.
  • ASA units make use of ASDM but also the Cisco standard CLI which makes it easier to train engineers to manage and have ease of deployment using config templates.
  • In the ASA5506, unlike its predecessor, there are no switched Ethernet ports. Adding that feature would be helpful and save the cost of the additional switch that must be purchased.
  • The real time log viewer is not that great, it's not 100% reliable, its explanations are often a bit too technical, the filter could use some enhancement
  • The ASDM interface as a whole being java is not good. Java has become a nightmare due to poor backwards compatibility and cliff-facing certificate requirements between versions, so java versions for administrators become a nightmare to manage for what should be simple changes
We appreciate that there are a variety of ASA units for different sized networks. It is particularly well suited for businesses that have multiple small to medium sites that need internet protection and VPN connections at the same time. The added capability of wireless access makes the ASA in our opinions a great one-stop shop for network, firewall, and VPN.
Read Richard Oberle's full review
October 17, 2018
Brandon Holbrook | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
Cisco ASA is our main firewall for our site. It is also the VPN termination point for our LAN to LAN VPNs and Remote Access VPNs. It has solved the problem of needing a firewall for cyber security. It has also solved the problem of employees needing remote access into the corporate network.
  • Cisco ASA is very configurable.
  • Cisco ASA has a lot of features.
  • Cisco ASA is robust. Failing almost never.
  • Cisco ASA can integrate with many other Cisco security solutions.
  • There is a learning curve for Cisco ASA.
  • A lot of what can be done, initially, needs to be done at the command line interface.
  • Organizing all the firewall rules can be a little daunting with the current UI.
Cisco ASA - we have integrated it with Cisco Firepower. Our Cisco ASA is an important part of our network infrastructure. When we need to implement a new firewall rule or edit an existing one the Cisco ASA UI makes this task easy. The Cisco ASA is well suited for any network firewall need.
Read Brandon Holbrook's full review
May 24, 2018
Jitu Mani Das | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
Cisco ASA is our main Perimeter firewall across the globe, routing all the internet traffic in and out of our infrastructure. It gives the secured way of filtering traffic as per our need. The best part of ASA is the support and trust of loyalty in last 10 years we just never have to reboot the device once also. Its credibility is amazing.
  • How we can manage: ASDM the GUI is so much easier to manage it even for a new guy also.
  • Traffic handling capacity
  • More secure and the different features it gives.
  • Support from the TAC team or from the community manages to handle issues very efficiently.
  • I would say Cisco should concentrate more how they will move way the traditional IPS to a new sand-boxing kind of environment.
CISCO ASA is suitable for every organization from MID range to HIGH RANGE. However, for small customers, they can buy Cisco product but support cost will be the challenge. However nowadays one tool is never enough, but Cisco gives us a unified way of managing infra with there different solutions. I agree they are more stable products comparing any products which are available in the Market.
Read Jitu Mani Das's full review
June 19, 2018
Jesus Mata | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
This device is being used across the entire organization. It is currently our firewall and what guards us from exterior attacks. It is also functioning as our VPN provider for users that need access outside of the company.
  • Great user management
  • Good usage of ACE and ACL rules that control the network
  • Decent power for a VPN that can be easily created
  • Not user friendly
  • The GUI is nice, but it doesn't tell you what it does
  • Sometimes, it's hard to track down exactly what is going on
  • Definitely well suited for a small to medium business where it can highlight the usage of its firewall and small amounts of VPN connectivity.
  • It might get overshadowed in a larger company.
Read Jesus Mata's full review

Feature Scorecard Summary

Identification Technologies (13)
Visualization Tools (12)
Content Inspection (11)
Policy-based Controls (13)
Active Directory and LDAP (13)
Firewall Management Console (14)
Reporting and Logging (14)
VPN (14)
High Availability (13)
Stateful Inspection (13)
Proxy Server (7)

What is Cisco ASA?

Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) software is the core operating software for Cisco’s ASA suite. It supports a variety of specialized network security and firewall options, allowing users to modularize to their business needs. It is scaled for enterprises through “clustering” ASAs, enabling 128 Gbps processing load and 50 million concurrent connections.

Cisco ASA provides a robust VPN setup process and integrates with other Cisco security offerings, including Cloud Web security and Trustsec. CWS provides cloud-based systems security across public and private clouds, and Trustsec is a software-defined segmentation product that mitigates the scope of network threats and data breaches. The platform also supports IPv4 and IPv6, enabling a smoother evolution in Internet Protocols for users.

Categories:  Firewall

Cisco ASA Technical Details

Operating Systems: Unspecified
Mobile Application:No