Cisco Catalyst Switches Reviews

In a medium to a large-sized enterprise network, I would definitely recommend Cisco. Especially if this is what the engineers who will be maintaining them will be used to. There are offerings that do switching better but few that can give a stable and reliable platform across L2/L3/Routing/Firewalls etc. Cisco provides excellent products for all these use cases. The level of support available from cisco is exceptional as well, however, you do you pay for what you get in terms of support. For small startups requiring only perhaps a few edge devices for switching, in this case, I would recommend a different product.

Cisco Catalyst products are best suited for high bandwidth, mission critical, highly available networks such as CCTV or large scale production environments, provided that company budgets are able to support it. Due to the popularity of the product and Cisco based network certifications, it will also be well suited for scenarios that require dedicated in-house support, as it will be easy to locate talent that can be onboarded to support this infrastructure.

For low budget, non-critical, development, low bandwidth or otherwise small scale scenarios, Cisco switches may not be the most cost effective choice. Lower cost options are available.

In corporate environments, they are very useful. Also good for any site where a good network structure is necessary. If it is necessary to access a location remotely, it is very useful for all the features and facilities it offers. Personally I consider it very useful in almost any environment, because Cisco has remained number one in the market.

gran cantidad opciones, para en diversos mercados

large number of options, for in various markets

For enterprise businesses with a need for a reliable platform, the Catalyst switches are a very good option. Smaller businesses and non-profit or government customers may find that the price is too expensive for their budget. The Cisco Catalyst line is best suited for campus networks, and at this point, is not designed for data center networks.

They are really good in our campus environment for business needs. We have a hard time with switches in hard environment locations. I know they have a manufacturing switch but it does not fit in the enclosures we use.

They are great for access later connectivity. For high density connections within distribution closests and access rooms there isn’t a better product on the market. However when you start looking at them for core data center functions they start to be come lack luster. They also work great in top of rack switch environments.

We have implemented Cisco Catalyst Switches at the data center as a core, and in every branch office as a core and border connection point. I think we can apply Cisco Catalyst Switches every time that we need a robust solution with a lot of success cases to back it up.

It is well suited for an enterprise network with large amounts of network devices where high levels of uptime is important. It is less suited for small businesses with a few computers where network outages will not impact the business. Due to price of the switch.

As Cisco is the de facto standard of networking equipment, support on the web and all the documentation you can find is excellent. Any issue you can have has probably already been solved by someone else on the internet. Using Cisco switches as endpoint switches and L3 routing switches on your core is a good way to create a robust and stable network.

Cisco Catalyst Switches are very well suited for the enterprise level. You pay a premium for reliability, and some companies cannot afford the price point for that reliability. Large enterprises are now looking for ways to function at the price point of a small to medium company. The industry is changing and companies have to adapt.

A Cisco Catalyst Switch can be used in any environment. If you want long up time and need a managed switch it is the perfect fit. If an unmanaged switch is needed for a small office, a Catalyst switch would be a bit overkill.

Let's put it this way - when is a catalyst switch not required!? In essence, the challenge is not justifying whether Catalyst Switches is the right path because we all know it's the better choice. It's a matter of which model is the right choice based on your scenario.

But making the choice of which model to place at which point is not always easy, even with the "Help Me Choose" option that Cisco offers. Always look at the datasheets and understand what you require, then make the selection before consulting with your Cisco account manager.

For the access layer, go with Cisco 2960X with the 10 Gig Fiber Uplinks. If you have multiple switches within the same rack, add on the stacking feature. Get these access layer switches to aggregate into some of the Cisco 3850s or more as your distribution nodes before finally linking into the larger Catalyst 6800 or the newer 9500.

These switches as mentioned are great in student labs, handle being turned on and off connected and reconnected, programmed and deprogrammed.

Well suited in environments requiring advanced features and security and small to large enterprises with a dedicated communications room. Switches can be noisy

I think Cisco 3850's and their other Catalyst layer 2/3 switches are best suited for large organizations that are willing to deal with bugs in code updates when they are trying to use the more advanced functions provided by Cisco. These functions make this essentially a layer 3 device that can be very convenient to leverage in a larger enterprise, but also introduce issues that can affect your organization. We have had issues that were supposed to be corrected in code upgrades, only to have other issues introduced once upgraded. This can be very frustrating in an environment that is 24/7 or requires no downtime.

Campus switching and routing - I would always deploy a Cisco Catalyst Switch if I could. I would prefer a Cisco Nexus switch for the data centre.

Cisco switches and routers can be used anywhere.