Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Review
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
Pros
- We came from DMVPN. With DMVPN, there's really no visibility. It's manually configured. I really like the fact that we can build in essence templates, application groups, and deploy to routers. Say we go to deploy a new site, upgrade a site. We're bringing the router online, connecting up to Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN, and deploying the already built application groups, which brings things up pretty quickly. My team's able to get new sites up and running a lot quicker than it used to be.
Cons
- Licensing. I know the business unit is working so that all the gen two routers, they're changing the license model. I understand why they're doing it, but I think it does need some improvement. Recently, we had a problem because of the code version of bugging the code where I had generated two routers I couldn't bring online, so they were in essence paperweights until we resolved it, which took a couple of weeks, and unfortunately, it delayed a couple of the deployments that we had.
Return on Investment
- I think the deployments have a positive impact. Once we got the application groups down, the configurations there, it's a lot easier for the staff to deploy and move over to Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN. That deployment makes it easier. I'll give you an example: we actually had a couple of deployments this morning at two sites on the West Coast, so we were able to start early in the morning and get them up and running. And no one at the site knew, not that they didn't know what was happening, but they weren't impacted in any way.
