Skip to main content
TrustRadius

Overview

What is CoreMedia?

CoreMedia is a global provider of web content management software headquartered in San Francisco and Hamburg, Germany, with offices in Singapore and London. CoreMedia CMS, or CoreMedia 7, is a Java-based web content management and publishing system supporting high traffic,…

Read more
Recent Reviews

TrustRadius Insights

CoreMedia is a versatile content management platform that is widely used across organizations to streamline content creation and …
Continue reading

Consistency is key

8 out of 10
August 31, 2014
Incentivized
CoreMedia was used at my previous organization to update the website for the entire organization. I used it specifically for two …
Continue reading

Works for me!

5 out of 10
April 19, 2014
I work for an advertising agency. We use Core Media to source traffic for our spots, input media buys, to update reports on our clients, …
Continue reading

Overall CMS

4 out of 10
April 11, 2014
The product is to restricted when our team wants to make custom changes over layouts and content
Continue reading
Read all reviews
Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing
N/A
Unavailable

What is CoreMedia?

CoreMedia is a global provider of web content management software headquartered in San Francisco and Hamburg, Germany, with offices in Singapore and London. CoreMedia CMS, or CoreMedia 7, is a Java-based web content management and publishing system supporting high traffic, multi-language, multi…

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting/Integration Services

Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?

12 people also want pricing

Alternatives Pricing

What is Contentful?

Contentful is a cloud based CMS solution that provides the ability to manage content across multiple platforms.The editing interface allows for managing content interactively and provides developers the ability to deliver the content with the programming language and template framework of their…

What is Umbraco CMS?

Umbraco is an open-source .NET Core CMS with over 700,000 active installs worldwide and with more than 200,000 active community members. It was first released on February 16th, 2005, and is still to this day an open-source project backed by a commercial company. To ensure Umbraco is always running…

Return to navigation

Product Demos

CoreMedia AppleTV Demo

YouTube

Content Cloud in 3 Minutes

YouTube

Digital Connect - 09 - Content Cloud Demo - Oliver Heyden

YouTube

Content Cloud Omnichannel Demo

YouTube
Return to navigation

Product Details

What is CoreMedia?

CoreMedia is a global provider of web content management software headquartered in San Francisco and Hamburg, Germany, with offices in Singapore and London. CoreMedia CMS, or CoreMedia 7, is a Java-based web content management and publishing system supporting high traffic, multi-language, multi-channel publishing. As it is targeted at global-oriented businesses and enterprises, CoreMedia touts Multi-site management with regionalization / localization via centralized control and preservation of brand for maintaining a uniform global image. CoreMedia uses object-oriented content modeling and provides security and separation of editorial and delivery environments. That is, it possesses a decoupled architecture. It contains inbuilt integration with SAP and IBM e-commerce platforms.

CoreMedia Video

CoreMedia Content Cloud

CoreMedia Technical Details

Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(11)

Community Insights

TrustRadius Insights are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, 3rd-party data sources. Have feedback on this content? Let us know!

CoreMedia is a versatile content management platform that is widely used across organizations to streamline content creation and governance. With over 100 users from different departments, CoreMedia has proven to be an effective tool for centrally managing content. Software engineers in IT and web developers in Electronic Communications have successfully implemented the product to deliver various content-driven applications, including a public website, peer-reviewed publications site, and a career advising content application.

One of the key strengths of CoreMedia is its ability to quickly and flexibly meet the needs of colleagues, making it an ideal choice for training purposes. Approximately 200 contributors utilize CoreMedia to build, manage, and maintain subsites on the organization's main website. This facilitates collaboration among team members and ensures consistent formatting. Furthermore, CoreMedia has been employed by associations to efficiently manage website content, with a central team handling publishing and day-to-day usage. Individual content owners and contributors can easily submit their content as desired for program/initiative pages.

In addition to its widespread use in organizations, CoreMedia has also found application in other industries. For instance, an advertising agency leverages CoreMedia for tasks such as sourcing traffic, inputting media buys, and tracking post logs for TV campaigns. This helps the media and media operations department keep things organized and effectively track TV campaigns with clients.

While CoreMedia offers a range of functionality and benefits, it does have some limitations. Custom changes over layouts and content are limited in the product. Nonetheless, organizations continue to find value in its features and ease of use when managing their diverse content needs.

Seamless Integration: Users have praised the software for its ability to seamlessly integrate with existing infrastructure and software applications, including ActiveDirectory authentication, Solr search engine, Java/Spring, and Oracle. This has been mentioned by multiple reviewers.

Flexible Content Publishing Workflows: Reviewers appreciate the flexibility of the software in terms of content publishing workflows. They mention that different workflows can be set up based on user roles, allowing for efficient management of both managed and unmanaged content production. Several users have highlighted this feature.

Customizable Templating System: The customizable templating system of the software has been highly appreciated by users. They mention that developers can easily tailor content and presentation without worrying about performance. This flexibility allows for a personalized and unique look and feel for each site, as stated by multiple reviewers.

Steep and slow learning curve: Many users have found the learning curve for CoreMedia to be steep and slow within their company. They have mentioned that it takes a significant amount of time and effort to become proficient in using CoreMedia effectively.

Difficult user interface: Reviewers have expressed difficulty with navigating the user interface of CoreMedia, describing it as not user-friendly, particularly for contributors. They have encountered challenges in finding specific features and functions within the system, which hampers their productivity.

Confusing content structure: Users have mentioned experiencing confusion regarding where content is located within CoreMedia and how it is linked to other folders. This lack of clarity has caused difficulties in managing and organizing content effectively, leading to inefficiencies in their workflow.

Attribute Ratings

Reviews

(1-5 of 5)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Sara Halperin | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 4 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We use CoreMedia to manage our main website. We have approximately 200 contributors internally who use the system to build, manage, and maintain subsites.
  • CoreMedia is a robust system that can manage large sites with multiple, well-organized subsites.
  • CoreMedia has a built-in workflow system that functions well for a distributed contributor model.
  • CoreMedia, although robust, is also complex. It is not easy to teach or learn, especially when a contributor is not in the system on a daily basis.
  • The user interface is built with developers in mind, but not with contributors in mind. It is hard to navigate and not easy to learn or remember.
  • Some of the terms are confusing. With the translation from German to English, not everything was translated well for an English-based American user base and it is easy to get confused whether one is, for example, marking something for deletion or actually deleting something.
CoreMedia would be great for a very large website handled by very astute developers, who are also editors. Unfortunately, developers and editors are not usually the same people, thus CoreMedia is ill-suited for our company and companies like ours.
Digital Experience Platform
N/A
N/A
Web Content Creation (2)
55%
5.5
Page templates
20%
2.0
Publishing workflow
90%
9.0
Web Content Management (3)
36.666666666666664%
3.7
Content taxonomy
50%
5.0
SEO support
30%
3.0
Bulk management
30%
3.0
Customer experience management
N/A
N/A
Results and Analysis
N/A
N/A
Platform & Infrastructure
N/A
N/A
Security (1)
30%
3.0
Role-based user permissions
30%
3.0
While CoreMedia has a better workflow, django CMS has a much easier user interface, wysiwyg editor, and is superior on every other level. Django CMS is easier to teach and support, easier to manage and develop, and provides much more flexibility in the development and design areas.
August 31, 2014

Consistency is key

Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
CoreMedia was used at my previous organization to update the website for the entire organization. I used it specifically for two departments and edited many subpages. It helped to streamline the web development process and helped keep formatting consistent across the board.
  • Easy to use for beginners, because the software is straightforward and easy to learn.
  • The input to output is consistent - when editing for a webpage, you know what to expect.
  • The program helps streamline the web development process and works to achieve fast, consistent results.
  • Every so often, there would be issues with HTML, that were occasionally difficult to troubleshoot.
  • Suggest having a preview feature that would show exactly what the website will look like after changes are implemented.
  • Add direct social media feature.
I think that CoreMedia is well-suited for a big organization because many staff members can use it at once and, with IT staff, can have a very convenient, consistent system. It may be less appropriate for a small organization where only one or two people are managing web development and don't need as vast or complex of a system.
  • Increased employee efficiency.
  • Fast time to achieve results saves company money.
  • Better constituent relations.
I prefer the CoreMedia system to Drupal because, in my experience, I have had many more inconsistencies with Drupal and issues with web errors. CoreMedia seems to be more up-to-date with the latest technology and has a more concrete editing process.
I am not in control of renewing software.
April 19, 2014

Works for me!

Score 5 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
I work for an advertising agency. We use Core Media to source traffic for our spots, input media buys, to update reports on our clients, to track our post logs in conjunction with Sigma, for addresses and plenty of other tasks for our clients. It is used by our media and media operations department. It helps keep things organized and to track our TV campaigns with our clients.
  • Gives us a detailed report as to what has aired versus what was bought.
  • Helps keep track of our buys.
  • Able to source out traffic through Core which is helpful.
  • It isn't as smart as it could be.
  • Needs to pick up more mistakes.
It seems we have to input a lot of work to generate reports that a computer system should be able to do for us. However, it is very well suited to keep track of things but can be very sensitive when it comes to adding buys and what not. Automatically inputs numbers when I tab over that shouldn't be there and doesn't pick up numbers that should (such as when inputting post logs) which can be quite annoying.
  • Increased employee proficiency compared to nothing at all. I really don't have anything else to compare it to though.
  • Reports from Core do not help/.
None
It isn't up to me.
April 11, 2014

Overall CMS

Score 4 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
The product is to restricted when our team wants to make custom changes over layouts and content
  • Good tool for collaboration
  • Queries in Coremedia compared to other tools are more robust
  • Responsive Design ready
  • Content customization by type of user (i.e. facebook style)
Does it meet our expections? Is it customizable? Does it offer support? How much will it cost to implement new features
  • Better Collaboration,
  • Restriction of content to certain users decreases the amount of changes over restricted content
  • Support price is really high - I would suggest you look into this area
I think Drupal is way far better CMS than Coremedia, unfortunately some companies prefer to have support over open source products
As mentioned before, making changes using this CMS was a tedious and pricy process
Score 5 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
CoreMedia is being used at our Association to manage content for our website. We have a central team within Communications that manages the publishing and day-to-day use or CoreMedia, but staff across all departments at our organization contribute content and work within CoreMedia. It allows individual content owners and contributors to submit their content as they would like it/or need it to appear on their program/initiative page.
  • Allows many staff members to contribute content to various portions of our website, and allows our Electronic-Communications staff to delegate tasks to these various staff (diffusing the work-load).
  • CoreMedia allows for easy creation of different types of content (like teasers, articles, download objects, links, etc). Permission levels can be set, so only certain staff can upload content such as photos, videos, or audio files.
  • The CoreMedia workflow process is easy to understand and follow. Once a staff member has submitted content for publishing to the web, they can then see who it's been assigned to for review, and at what time. You're able to leave detailed notes and stay abreast of where the workflow is at any given time.
  • Where content lives within CoreMedia can often be confusing (i.e. you have created an article, but are linking to content in another folder that might be completely unrelated). Navigating to and from different content folders can be frustrating and often confusing on where the content "lives" versus where it is posted on the website.
  • Formatting is CoreMedia is less than desirable. You have minimal options for headings and other formatting options, resulting in a dull, or boring website. Several of the formatting functions don't work across different browsers, for example, bullet points.
  • Because some users are granted different permissions levels, staff often have to wait in order for an admin user to assist with certain aspects of their workflow. There should be a button, or option to submit an urgent request on an item from within CoreMedia, rather than having to email colleagues via Outlook. Additionally, there could be an added level of permissions for basic users, more advanced users, and then the admins of the system who ultimately publish content.
For websites with many individual pages, CoreMedia can certainly get out of hand very quickly. Our Association's website has over 30,000 pages, which is too many, but managing those in CoreMedia is quick difficult. The search function isn't always very helpful, and the system itself is not automatic or intuitive to help you in keeping content current. Questions to ask might be: how many people will I have using this product? Who will ultimately be in charge of publishing content? Do you have set web standards to share with staff to allow for the delegation of tasks/content contributions?
  • Increased employee efficiency
  • Sometimes unsatisfactory reviews from users because our site is hard to navigate or it looks "old"
  • Increased organization of content. Although this is still an issue we're working to fix, there is the potential to be more organized in CoreMedia.
  • ASG Content Management
CoreMedia is slightly better. I was not a part of the original team to select CoreMedia for our web content management tool. It was already in place when I came to my organization, but it's certainly presented challenges along the way as well as solutions to certain problems. I think at this point, we're going to continue using CoreMedia, although we're investigated ways to enhance our use of it.
I am ultimately not a part of the team that would make this decision, but as a content contributor who works in CoreMedia daily, I would suggest looking for a content system that allows for more customization of our site. I think there is a lot of work to be done on the back end to make this the product we want to stick with.
Return to navigation