Firebase

Although there are other backend platforms that could have provided us with a solution to our project. The way of grouping the solution in FIREBASE, atomizing in the same project the database, cloud functions, authentication, push notifications, etc., has given us a clearer picture of what would be the correct path to achieve the objective.

Unlike other tools in the GCP suite that have an equivalent in other clouds such as Bigquery (Athenas on AWS), AI Platform (Sagemaker), Storage (S3), we do not find an equivalent as complete as Firebase in any other provider. This is the main reason why we chose this provider and developed the entire application for the simplicity of integrating all these mentioned services.

Firebase came to a multiuse case for our product for authenticating backend services, users on the app & get data on the user base using the dashboard.

Firebase has a single NoSQL database, it is a simple, powerful and uniform application development platform in connectors, it has multiple programming languages ​​such as JavaScript and necessary tools that will simplify the creation of applications.

Firebase poses great documentation and integration with Android devices. And it's very good as well for iOS ones. So, for these scenarios, Firebase becomes the ideal ally.

It eases the app development process, has an extensive database that allows you to store media files in the cloud, supports robust uploads and downloads, and login authentication on any platform.

PostgreSQL is a relational database and is well suited for complex applications, however, Firebase is well suited for light and faster applications.

Firebase is easy to manage and scale really well for web application services. It offers better authentication and is easy to implement. For real-time analytics on web applications, it works very well. Firebase offers more features compared to other services especially it can be used with other programming languages. Other solutions are dependent on the type of languages that are less flexible. Moreover, there can be a lot done with cloud function and firebase to make a serverless web application.

We choose Firebase for various reasons:

• A large set of resources and world-class Google support.
• Pricing was a larger role in this decision.

If I get a suitable budget next year, I'll be switching us to Adobe Analytics. Their app/web tracking and the interface are streets ahead of Firebase.

Firebase is a much more comprehensive tool. While Fabric only had user traffic and trends data, it did not have the user communication set of tools. While CleverTap has CRM tools, it does not have tools for developers and product teams. While Adobe Analytics is good with analytics, it does not have crash reporting or CRM capabilities. Thus, Firebase is an all in one tool that is great for startups and SMEs.

I haven't played much with Heroku beyond deploying projects from GitHub. It looks to be very similar in providing a cloud-based platform for developing and deploying web apps as quickly as possible. I would look at comparing both of these before choosing a solution. I am just happy with Firebase and don't feel the need to look for a replacement.

We chose Firebase for the following reasons.

• Online resources.
• Comes with better support.
• Price ranges are also fair.
• Product of Google.
• Can try it for free.

Before using Firebase, we exclusively used self hosted database services. Using Firebase has allowed us to reduce reliance on single points of failure and systems that are difficult to scale. Additionally, Firebase is much easier to set up and use than any sort of self hosted database. This simplicity has allowed us to try features that we might not have based on the amount of work they required in the past.

Firebase does a lot of things well, but Branch.io does a lot of things great. We originally chose Firebase because it was free, had great crash reporting, and full event tracking. As we began to scale, increase paid marketing spend, and implement features such as journey banners, web-to-app and deep links for emails we needed a more enterprise solution - that's where Branch came in.

Overall, Firebase is an amazing tool if you are just starting out, otherwise, you may want to look into a more enterprise tool.

It's tough to pick out competitors against Firebase as I'm really unsure and doubt there's another product exactly like it. As mentioned before Firebase literally does everything you can imagine for a mobile application but doesn't get insanely deep in one feature or action. It involves analytics, notifications, database, cloud storage, CRM, attribution, deep linking, dynamic linking, crash reporting, and so much more. It's not amazing at any specific thing (except maybe their database which is AWESOME) but good at all of it.

We used Firebase for everything in the beginning as it was free and got the job done then as we grew, we started to pay for and integrate with more advanced systems but will always have Firebase in there as well.

Firebase is well suited for projects with simpler database workloads that require its real-time features. For data that is heavily read in real time, it's a great choice and gives developers a lot of features that would have been complicated and time-consuming to build up front for free. If the workload is more complex, a different database engine is generally preferred.