Microsoft IIS Reviews

67 Ratings
<a href='' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.0 out of 100

Do you work for this company? Manage this listing

Overall Rating

Reviewer's Company Size

Last Updated

By Topic




Job Type


Reviews (1-18 of 18)

Rahul Dhangar | TrustRadius Reviewer
September 21, 2019

Microsoft IIS Server - Honest review by a FullStack developer

Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We use Microsoft IIS for specific requirements on client deliverables. Certain projects require us to implement Microsoft IIS for overall project hosting and delivery. Microsoft IIS is very easy to install, and its GUI is very informative. The Microsoft Server facilitates implementation of SQL database seamless. It is very useful due to its simplicity for small projects which primarily require CRUD operations in SQL.
  • Troubleshooting problems is very easy due to the server logs, which are maintained by default in Microsoft IIS.
  • Awesome integration with Visual Studio and dot NET applications.
  • Best performance with Microsoft tools and services, because of its native nature with them.
  • Microsoft IIS' performance, in comparison with lean web-servers like Nginx and Apache, has a lot of room for improvement.
  • Since it is a non-open source solution and a proprietary Microsoft software, it is tied with Microsoft Windows OS, which is prone to new security vulnerabilities on a frequent basis.
  • The logging of errors is very vague in nature sometimes, which makes it difficult to get to the root cause of the error, and means it takes more time in debugging.
Well suited for small websites which need to be hosted on the same environment without getting into the trouble of managing services differently. Clustering is a costly offense if you want to deal with a high volume of data, because of IIS' costly licensing for the server, and the OS also makes it less favorable.
Read Rahul Dhangar's full review
Kyle Kochtan | TrustRadius Reviewer
August 20, 2019

Microsoft IIS for enterprise business

Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We are currently using Microsoft IIS throughout our organization. We are using Microsoft IIS for internal sites, external private sites and public .com sites. We are utilizing all sorts of authentication methods with all of these sites, Windows auth, forms auth, anonymous auth, and SSO. We also have a number of web services in Microsoft IIS.
  • Microsoft IIS is very good at quickly and easily starting up a website
  • Microsoft IIS is excellent at hosting .net sites, this makes development and deployment seamless
  • Microsoft IIS is great for multiple domains pointing to the same sites
  • Microsoft IIS security could be more straightforward
  • Security can be difficult if you want to use a 3rd party claims authentication
  • Custom Handlers can be difficult to manage
Microsoft IIS is perfect for spinning up a new website. You can manually set everything up or create scripts to automate the process. Microsoft IIS also works great with Microsoft Azure DevOps continuous Integration and deployment services. This makes Microsoft IIS a powerful tool for hosting as you can automate every aspect of deployment.
Read Kyle Kochtan's full review
Vinicius Lima | TrustRadius Reviewer
August 12, 2019

Good web and application server for .NET applications

Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We use Microsoft IIS across the whole organization as a web server for our web projects. IIS is basically a requirement for those running web servers on Windows. We are using IIS to host multiple .NET web applications and websites.
  • IIS is easy to configure, quick to get up and running.
  • Ability to work with PowerShell
  • Separation of application pools for shared environments
  • Built in scalability options
  • Although it supports other technologies than .NET, it's not a straightforward process
  • Log files are difficult to find and read
  • Depends on Windows Server
Microsoft IIS is suitable for those that work with .NET applications and other Microsoft technologies.
Read Vinicius Lima's full review
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
November 27, 2019

Microsoft IIS

Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We build a business web application to support operations which are hosted on Windows servers using IIS. I would say that our utilisation of IIS is probably considered fairly basic with it running .Net websites using winforms and some re-write rules, nothing too grandiose but it meets our needs and has rarely been a cause for concern.
  • Website hosting.
  • URL rewriting.
  • Session hosting.
  • Limited built-in diagnosis.
It goes without saying that it is well suited to hosting websites built on a Microsoft technology stack, but we also have a couple of PHP websites running using the plugin that run very well.
Read this authenticated review
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
August 22, 2019

Microsoft IIS, a Solid Web Server

Score 6 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We use Microsoft IIS across the enterprise as an offering for web servers on Windows machines. We use it to host several of our enterprise workloads as well as some of our smaller web properties. IIS has been a staple of our stack for many years.
  • Handle a decent amount of loads
  • Easily configurable
  • Simple UI to customize for different applications
  • Is memory-intensive
  • Has multi-threading issues
  • Cannot be used for connection pooling by itself
I would recommend it if you use a Windows environment and have to utilize a medium processing load. If you have high availability loads, I'd recommend a more simplified webserver like Nginix or Apache. They provide a better threading model for resources.
Read this authenticated review
Valery Mezentsau | TrustRadius Reviewer
February 13, 2019

There is no place for web sites like IIS

Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
I and my IT department currently and previously use Microsoft IIS as the main web server solution for internal and public-facing websites. In a Microsoft environment, I think, this is the best option for the web server. Easy to deploy the server, easy upload websites. Didn't have too many issues with Microsoft ISS, simple to use, saves time on deployment. Our current IIS environment contains not only internal and external websites but several web services that interact with third-party services for identity, fraud detection, etc.
  • Easy to deploy and minimum time for the first startup.
  • Supports a large variety of web technologies.
  • Easy website and applications management.
  • The best integration with Microsoft AD for user authentication.
  • It is regularly patched.
  • For some web applications, it takes additional time to configure IIS to make a website work.
  • IIS logging - it is not the strongest side of the product.
  • Compared to Apache or Nginx, IIS uses way more system resources.
  • Even with regular patches, IIS has many vulnerabilities.
Microsoft IIS is well suited for simple website hosting and for more complex web application setups as well. Granular security features allow you to make your web site or app to be protected as much as possible. Plus by default the best integration with other Microsoft services like Active Directory, WSUS, SCCM, etc. However, if you need just a basic website that is not based on MS components, open source solutions like Apache or Nginx could be better and cheaper (based on Linux).
Read Valery Mezentsau's full review
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
August 10, 2018

Microsoft Windows IIS is a great application host for first timers or for complex deployments

Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
IIS is being used to drive an internal NodeJS application within our department and is used widely throughout the rest of our company for other internal services. The primary driving force behind using it is the ease of integrating Windows Single Sign-On for all of our internal sites.
  • Windows Authentication for Single Sign-On makes managing permission easier by using custom Active Directory groups
  • Serving static site files is incredibly easy
  • Allows for easy binding of ports and hostnames
  • Ease of integrating SSL certificates
  • Configuration of NodeJS application took effort with some undocumented loopholes
  • Deploying a NodeJS app with Single Sign-On was challenging when it came to asynchronous requests as OPTION requests do not include authorization and needed to be approved in an automated fashion prior to the NodeJS application being called
Well suited when utilizing Windows servers that require multiple sites to be deployed and you don't want to employ multiple services to run different applications
Read this authenticated review
Kiran Kumar Pariti | TrustRadius Reviewer
April 13, 2017

Common assests in IIS Server

Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
My IT department is using the IIS server and we manage this for using the webservices as well as multiple websites. Not much problem with IIS and is simple to use, efficient and time saving. We can host the websites using this so that the other team or developers can access this. We can also restrict the users and make the privacy settings authenticate the users accordingly. We can also give the privileges and user rights depending on the hierarchy.
  • Easy access
  • User authentication
  • Multiple websites
  • We can browse and check the website then and there itself
  • [To] Stop and start running the applications are so simple in IIS
  • IP Masking or websites URL masking
  • Extensions
For multiple applications, IIS is the best suitable software. Comes with Windows (if you install a patch file). Easy to install. Navigation is so simple that a mid level programmer can understand. Supports almost all the Webservers. Managing the websites and the applications is so simple. When hosting the application it takes its default port number instead of specifying.
Read Kiran Kumar Pariti's full review
John Glenn | TrustRadius Reviewer
May 27, 2016

To IIS or not to IIS?

Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We use IIS in a number of different ways. Some of our homegrown .NET apps run internally on our network as well as several other boxed software installs that require the use of IIS. Our current setup involves about 6 servers all running the latest version of IIS and they seem to be easy to work with and are patched fairly regularly by our staff.
  • Very easy to deploy new sites.
  • Great integration with Visual Studio .NET.
  • Easy to troubleshoot.
  • The SQL integration is also fairly seamless.
  • It seems like they don't do new version migrations easily. Newer versions of IIS have required that we change our web.config files to exclude certain portions.
  • Error messages can be vague if you didn't write them in yourself.
  • I would like there to be a way to snapshot instances of IIS without having to snapshot an entire server. Not as a pass/fail test but more as a consistent backup for site hacks and malware.
It is perfect for small dev projects where you would like to put the data into SQL. Put IIS together with SQL Express and you have a fairly robust application space for free! If you are passing along a big data site I don't think that IIS would be your best bet. It does offer clustering, which is the IIS answer to high volume, but that can get pricey with multiple server instances and licensing for the OS.
Read John Glenn's full review
Aaron Hartzler | TrustRadius Reviewer
December 02, 2015

Microsoft IIS is a solid solution

Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
Micorsoft IIS is being used as our main web server for internal applications as well as hosting external web sites of which we have a least half a dozen or so. It is being used or rather consumed across the company as one of the main applications which drives the business. It allows our users to access one of the main applications very easily through the web and on mobile devices.

The main problems it addresses are ease of access, not having to have a fat client installed for particular applications, ease of manageability for web applications and websites, easy to troubleshoot, easy to maintain and perform system maintenance.
  • Ease of access for users.
  • Not having to have a fat client installed for particular applications; just access from browser or mobile device.
  • Ease of manageability for web applications and websites.
  • Easy to troubleshoot.
  • Easy to maintain and perform system maintenance.
  • Many many features, functions, and very customizable.
  • Simplify the user interface. It has basically stayed the same and certain things/pieces are cumbersome to get to.
  • Not much else, it does a good job for what it was made to do.
Key questions to ask are:

What are you trying to do? If simply hosting a website, there are other solutions to do this that are simpler and more cost effective. If you are using some vendor's application and needing to push it out via web/mobile, then Microsoft IIS is a great tool for the job.

What is the level of security needed? If just simple security, then there are other solutions to do this that are simpler and more cost effective. If more granular and complex security needs are at hand, then Microsoft IIS offers extensive security customization regarding access, accounts, ports, etc.

What type of administration and management are you looking to give? If you want a one time "set it and forget it" type environment, then Microsoft IIS can be it for you. Or if you have something that needs to be constantly changed and updated, Microsoft IIS also offers the flexibility and speed to keep your environment going in a fast paced businesses.
Read Aaron Hartzler's full review
payton climer | TrustRadius Reviewer
December 02, 2015

Microsoft IIS - Good for certain situations

Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
Within our department, Microsoft IIS is being used as a web server for sites that require Windows based components. Our main use for Microsoft IIS is for sites that use the ASP.NET framework. However, we also use IIS for Microsoft systems management software. Which includes both System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM ConfigMgr 2012) and Windows Server Update Services (WSUS). Microsoft IIS allows for us to better host our Windows based components than current open source solutions.
  • Microsoft IIS provides an in depth GUI that helps for managing sites.
  • Native support of the ASP.NET framework for web applications. Overall this has given us better compatibility than a Apache/Mono setup.
  • Since it's a Microsoft product, it's natively better integrated with our Windows based environment (Active Directory).
  • The performance of Microsoft IIS is always slightly behind more lean web servers like Apache and NGINX.
  • Microsoft IIS is locked to the Windows Operating System. For some components (SCCM and WSUS) you are essentially forced to use IIS, instead of a more open source Apache or Mono solution.
  • Security concerns over Windows IIS web servers. While this isn't directly the fault of IIS, since issues usually occur from vulnerabilities within the Windows OS.
  • IIS is closed source, which does remove customizability and the ability for the community to review the code base. An open source web server will usually has less exploits, since the code base can be reviewed and debugged by anyone.
Microsoft IIS is well suited in several different situations. If the native support and better compatibility with ASP.NET framework sites is needed, it's better to use a Microsoft IIS web server.
Running Microsoft Systems management tools like WSUS and SCCM, you are required to use a IIS web server. Also, IIS might be slightly easier for anyone not experienced with a web server. Especially with the relative ease of install on any modern Microsoft Windows OS.

However, for sites that don't require Microsoft components. It's going to be more beneficial to run a Linux web server. This is because you will get better performance, better security, and the large community support behind open-source projects like Apache and NGINX.
Read payton climer's full review
Leo Brewer | TrustRadius Reviewer
December 22, 2015

IIS, a Quick and Impartial Review

Score 6 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
Many applications leverage Microsoft IIS within my current organization and in previous places of employ. I currently manage SafeNet Authentication Manager, Thycotic Secret Server, and other applications that use Microsoft IIS as it's web server.
  • Support of application integration is a strength, many COTS applications are supported by Microsoft IIS.
  • Microsoft IIS on the Windows Server 2012 R2 platform is very configurable.
  • Easily configured for Active Directory authentication.
  • Compared to Apache, Microsoft IIS has a large memory footprint.
  • Microsoft regularly changes it's administrative utility, sometimes drastically, which causes a learning curve one version to the next.
  • With some applications you need to spend quite some time tuning Microsoft IIS to bring it to an acceptable level of performance.
Many commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) vendors only support Microsoft IIS, in these cases I would not recommend trying to make it work with other platforms such as Apache. If you are in a primarily Microsoft Windows Server environment, I would recommend using Microsoft IIS as opposed to trying to make Apache or other web platforms run on Windows. If you have an abundance of Linux knowledge in-house and the application supports Apache, I recommend using Apache on Linux as a more optimal use of resources.
Read Leo Brewer's full review
Alan Matson, CCNA:S, MCP | TrustRadius Reviewer
December 11, 2015

IIS, keeping up with the opensource servers with its own strengths.

Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We used Microsoft IIS to run several in house applications that were used for supporting our technical support department. These applications were written in ASPX.
  • Easy to set up.
  • Very easy to manage with the Microsoft IIS GUI.
  • Quick to load the applications.
  • Better custom logging generation line with Apache or Nginx.
Microsoft IIS is less suited for running a few generic websites as the resources consumed are more than some of the open source servers. However, when it comes to dynamic web applications Microsoft IIS shines.
Read Alan Matson, CCNA:S, MCP's full review
Peter Quale | TrustRadius Reviewer
December 03, 2015

The Only Software I've Used Continuously for 20 Years

Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We consider IIS a critical desktop application on all Windows machines. It is simply the best platform for rapidly testing scripts, prototyping tools, and automating many of our menial day-to-day tasks.
  • The IIS SEO Toolkit is aging very well, and is still an important tool in our everyday website testing.
  • IIS makes it very easy for us to test URL rewriting and reverse proxies in advance of launching changes on live websites.
  • Website speed is so critical and IIS makes testing performance optimization strategies painless and quick.
  • Honestly, improvements over the years have been right in-line with our needs.
  • We're I to ask for anything, we'd love an IIS extension for the Log Parser Studio. Perhaps I'm just lazy.
Having used Microsoft IIS with most languages and database platforms, I would not hesitate to recommend it for any organizations with a strong Microsoft background.
Read Peter Quale's full review
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
April 12, 2017

IIS Review

Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
IIS serves a multiplicity of uses for us. It provides internal resources and applications for staff and products for our customer base. The application provides us easy access to multiple internally-developed and vendor-supplied applications for our various internal departments and ready access by our customers to our various products and services.
  • Ease of management. IIS is relatively easy to install, configure, monitor and troubleshoot.
  • Security. IIS is a large application, with known vulnerabilities and a relatively large attack surface.
  • Monitoring and logging. While much of the IIS infrastructure is easily interpreted, more meaningful error messages would be very useful. Arcane event/error messages that are only meaningful to the publisher are not especially useful to a business managing the product.
IIS is excellent for integrating web resources for existing Microsoft products, especially Exchange. It is formidable at deploying applications, especially for internal use.
Read this authenticated review
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
March 28, 2017

IIS - Should be first choice for .Net web applications

Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
IIS is used for most publicly-facing web properties in the organization, as well as a number of internal-only line-of-business web applications (used organization-wide and per department) and the corporate SharePoint.
  • Ease of configuration. IIS Manager provides access to almost all of IIS functionality via an easy to use GUI.
  • Centralized Certificate Store means SSL certs can be centrally stored and referenced by various IIS installs.
  • Strong user base means issues can often be resolved quickly via forums, etc.
  • Some settings are not accessible via the GUI. This can obfuscate changes made directly by some application.
  • Setting up impersonation for security can be difficult.
For all .Net based web applications on a Windows server infrastructure, IIS is the first choice. For bundled, third-party apps, it usually makes more sense to use the web server the app comes with (Apache, etc).
Read this authenticated review
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
March 28, 2016

IIS for Application Hosting

Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
Microsoft IIS is an integral part of any infrastructure and in my own, counts for a significant portion of internal and external application delivery. As a tried and true web server platform, we confidently trust this server extension with some of our most important web applications.
  • Largely expandable to meet different security requirements.
  • As a Microsoft product, documentation and other support resources are widely available.
  • High availability and robustness lead to low administrative overhead
  • Logging may be a little tricky without appropriate parsing tools.
  • Application pools may be misconfigured when built by an application. Sometimes manual performance tweaking is necessary.
  • Update cycle could be a little tighter but not a legitimate complaint
In my opinion IIS is far more appropriate with internal web applications ONLY because the alternative UNIX equivalents feel more secure by nature when working with public facing resources.
Read this authenticated review
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
December 01, 2015

Basic Review from and MSP

Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
I work for a managed service provider (MSP) that manages web applications for our users. Our perferred method of hosting is using Microsoft IIS.
  • Excellent Logging
  • Ease of use
  • Management of Application Pools (ie, the ability to gracefully recycle a single site)
  • SMTP relays only work in IIS6. Even when I'm on server 2012 R2 (IIS8) I have to install IIS6 management console to use a relay.
  • Not an IIS issue, but IIS has to be installed on Windows which is a performance hog compared to linux/Apache.
For us Microsoft IIS makes the most sense so our support team (front line Tier 1) can perform simple tasks that don't have to go to my team. The GUI interface and extreme ease of use makes Microsoft IIS our go-to.
Read this authenticated review

Feature Scorecard Summary

IDE support (14)
Security management (18)
Administration and management (18)
Application server performance (18)
Installation (18)
Open-source standards compliance (10)

About Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS is an application server and infrastructure.

Microsoft IIS Technical Details

Operating Systems: Unspecified
Mobile Application:No