Skip to main content
TrustRadius
Infor VISUAL

Infor VISUAL

Overview

What is Infor VISUAL?

Infor VISUAL is an ERP software focused on manufacturing companies with business intelligence, planning and scheduling, and pricing, quoting, and estimating capabilities, among others.

Read more
Recent Reviews

Infor Visual

10 out of 10
April 21, 2022
Incentivized
it's order-driven manufacturing where the complex situation can be solved and complete end-to-end ERP solution. The level of speed and …
Continue reading
Read all reviews
Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing
Infor VISUAL

Infor VISUAL

N/A
Unavailable

What is Infor VISUAL?

Infor VISUAL is an ERP software focused on manufacturing companies with business intelligence, planning and scheduling, and pricing, quoting, and estimating capabilities, among others.

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting / Integration Services

Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?

6 people also want pricing

Alternatives Pricing

Genius Solutions

Genius Solutions

$1,500
per user for one year
What is Genius Solutions?

Genius Solutions delivers a complete enterprise resource planning (ERP) solution, including software, implementation services, and field expertise for small to mid-sized custom manufacturers across the US and Canada. Genius ERP is built for SME manufacturers handling make-to-order, engineer-to…

Cetec ERP

Cetec ERP

$40
per month
What is Cetec ERP?

Cetec ERP offers manufacturing web-native ERP As A Service for $40/user. Its design and delivery provide manufacturers with a platform built to increase both capacity and efficiency. The vendor states that companies will run faster on Cetec ERP. By providing a single, integrated platform that can…

Return to navigation

Product Details

What is Infor VISUAL?

Infor VISUAL is a manufacturing ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) that enables organizations to manage their manufacturing operations.

With Infor VISUAL, organizations can manage various aspects of the manufacturing process, including inventory management, production planning, scheduling, purchasing, and quality control. It provides real-time visibility into critical data, enabling organizations to make informed decisions and respond quickly to changing market demands.

Infor VISUAL supports end-to-end supply chain management, allowing businesses to effectively track materials, manage suppliers, and optimize production workflows. It enables efficient order fulfillment, reducing lead times and improving customer satisfaction.

Furthermore, Infor VISUAL offers comprehensive reporting and analytics capabilities, allowing organizations to monitor key performance indicators, identify trends, and uncover opportunities for process improvement. By leveraging these insights, businesses can optimize their operations, reduce costs, and increase profitability.

Infor VISUAL Competitors

Infor VISUAL Technical Details

Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo

Frequently Asked Questions

Infor VISUAL is an ERP software focused on manufacturing companies with business intelligence, planning and scheduling, and pricing, quoting, and estimating capabilities, among others.

JobBOSS and NetSuite ERP are common alternatives for Infor VISUAL.

Reviewers rate Location management and Pricing and Order entry highest, with a score of 10.

The most common users of Infor VISUAL are from Mid-sized Companies (51-1,000 employees).
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(17)

Attribute Ratings

Reviews

(1-5 of 5)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
April 21, 2022

Infor Visual

Verified User
Administrator in Information Technology
Health, Wellness and Fitness Company, 1001-5000 employees
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
it's order-driven manufacturing where the complex situation can be solved and complete end-to-end ERP solution. The level of speed and efficiency is the market best. Quality on time is highly appreciated.
Pros and Cons
  • End to end ERP solution
  • Easy to implement and use
  • Embraces finite and lean scheduling concept
  • Much scalability is required.
  • Billing can be reduced.
  • Support prospect can be improved.
Likelihood to Recommend
Embraces finite and lean scheduling concepts. Scales vertical in size and horizontal across multiple entities. Easy to implement and use.
Infor VISUAL Feature Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting (7)
88.57142857142858%
8.9
Accounts payable
90%
9.0
Accounts receivable
90%
9.0
Global Financial Support
100%
10.0
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
80%
8.0
Journals and Reconciliations
100%
10.0
Configurable Accounting
70%
7.0
Standardized Processes
90%
9.0
Subledger and Financial Process (5)
94%
9.4
Billing Management
80%
8.0
Cash and Asset Management
100%
10.0
Travel & Expense Management
100%
10.0
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
100%
10.0
Period Close
90%
9.0
Inventory Management (3)
76.66666666666667%
7.7
Inventory tracking
60%
6.0
Automatic reordering
70%
7.0
Location management
100%
10.0
Order Management (5)
80%
8.0
Pricing
100%
10.0
Order entry
100%
10.0
Credit card processing
N/A
N/A
Cost of goods sold
100%
10.0
Order Orchestration
100%
10.0
Payroll Management (3)
N/A
N/A
Pay calculation
N/A
N/A
Benefit plan administration
N/A
N/A
Direct deposit files
N/A
N/A
Reporting & Analytics (3)
26.666666666666664%
2.7
Dashboards
80%
8.0
Standard reports
N/A
N/A
Custom reports
N/A
N/A
Customization (2)
N/A
N/A
API for custom integration
N/A
N/A
Plug-ins
N/A
N/A
Security (2)
N/A
N/A
Role-based user permissions
N/A
N/A
Single sign-on capability
N/A
N/A
Grants Management (1)
N/A
N/A
Award Lifecycle Management
N/A
N/A
Project Financial Management (6)
N/A
N/A
Budgeting and Forecasting
N/A
N/A
Project Costing
N/A
N/A
Cost Capture
N/A
N/A
Capital Project Management
N/A
N/A
Customer Contract Compliance
N/A
N/A
Project Revenue Recognition
N/A
N/A
Project Execution Management (4)
N/A
N/A
Project Planning and Scheduling
N/A
N/A
Task Insight for Project Managers
N/A
N/A
Project Mobile Functionality
N/A
N/A
Definable Resource Pools
N/A
N/A
Procurement (5)
N/A
N/A
Bids Analyzed and Compared
N/A
N/A
Contract Authoring
N/A
N/A
Contract Repository
N/A
N/A
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
N/A
N/A
Supplier Management
N/A
N/A
Risk Management (5)
N/A
N/A
Risk Repository
N/A
N/A
Control Management
N/A
N/A
Control Efficiency Assessments
N/A
N/A
Issue Detection
N/A
N/A
Remediation and Certification
N/A
N/A
Logistics (5)
N/A
N/A
Transportation Planning and Optimization
N/A
N/A
Transportation Execution Management
N/A
N/A
Trade and Customs Management
N/A
N/A
Fulfillment Management
N/A
N/A
Warehouse Workforce Management
N/A
N/A
Manufacturing (5)
N/A
N/A
Production Process Design
N/A
N/A
Production Management
N/A
N/A
Configuration Management
N/A
N/A
Work Execution
N/A
N/A
Manufacturing Costs
N/A
N/A
Supply Chain (3)
N/A
N/A
Forecasting
N/A
N/A
Inventory Planning
N/A
N/A
Performance Monitoring
N/A
N/A
Product Lifecycle Management (2)
N/A
N/A
Proposal Management
N/A
N/A
Product Master Data Management
N/A
N/A
Return on Investment
  • Good Billing provided
  • Easy to implement and use
  • scales vertical and horizontal
Alternatives Considered
Based on use cases and implementation. Scaling and scheduling meet CTO and ETO.
Other Software Used
Usability
10
Because of use cases and easy implementation and the vertical and horizontal scaling.
Support Rating
9
As we have seen the live environment and the use cases where we implement.
August 27, 2020

VISUAL - Not so obvious. Look elsewhere.

Scott Sichmeller | TrustRadius Reviewer
Scott Sichmeller
Vice President Of Engineering and Operations
Skidmore Pump (Machinery, 11-50 employees)
Score 2 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
VISUAL is being used across the whole organization. We operate in a job shop environment. Sales inputs customer orders and unit BOMs. As an actual cost environment, we will track labor and material used against specific jobs in operations. Supply chain manages inventory, and finance will run financial reporting from the database.
Pros and Cons
  • Part/BOM libraries
  • Traceability from customer order to work order
  • Job status representation
  • Click through is not intuitive and often takes multiple clicks/open windows to get information on the availability of a specific part
  • Infor operates on proposed availability rather than actual. If a work order is late to the due date, Infor still treats the material as if it is available
  • Engineering changes are cumbersome. Manual changes required of parts and assemblies in your library
Likelihood to Recommend
I struggle to identify a scenario where VISUAL is an appropriate solution. We used VISUAL because it was a legacy system and the cost/complexity of changeover seemed daunting. The user interface is poor as is the interconnectedness of the various screens and menus. This might be an acceptable piece of software for a continuous manufacturing environment with little variation of basic design, but we have had to write multiple add-on macros in order to get VISUAL to work effectively for us.
Infor VISUAL Feature Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting (7)
N/A
N/A
Accounts payable
N/A
N/A
Accounts receivable
N/A
N/A
Global Financial Support
N/A
N/A
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
N/A
N/A
Journals and Reconciliations
N/A
N/A
Configurable Accounting
N/A
N/A
Standardized Processes
N/A
N/A
Subledger and Financial Process (5)
N/A
N/A
Billing Management
N/A
N/A
Cash and Asset Management
N/A
N/A
Travel & Expense Management
N/A
N/A
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
N/A
N/A
Period Close
N/A
N/A
Inventory Management (3)
20%
2.0
Inventory tracking
30%
3.0
Automatic reordering
N/A
N/A
Location management
30%
3.0
Order Management (5)
6%
0.6
Pricing
N/A
N/A
Order entry
N/A
N/A
Credit card processing
N/A
N/A
Cost of goods sold
30%
3.0
Order Orchestration
N/A
N/A
Payroll Management (3)
N/A
N/A
Pay calculation
N/A
N/A
Benefit plan administration
N/A
N/A
Direct deposit files
N/A
N/A
Reporting & Analytics (2)
15%
1.5
Dashboards
10%
1.0
Standard reports
20%
2.0
Customization (2)
5%
0.5
API for custom integration
10%
1.0
Plug-ins
N/A
N/A
Security (2)
N/A
N/A
Role-based user permissions
N/A
N/A
Single sign-on capability
N/A
N/A
Grants Management (1)
N/A
N/A
Award Lifecycle Management
N/A
N/A
Project Financial Management (6)
N/A
N/A
Budgeting and Forecasting
N/A
N/A
Project Costing
N/A
N/A
Cost Capture
N/A
N/A
Capital Project Management
N/A
N/A
Customer Contract Compliance
N/A
N/A
Project Revenue Recognition
N/A
N/A
Project Execution Management (4)
N/A
N/A
Project Planning and Scheduling
N/A
N/A
Task Insight for Project Managers
N/A
N/A
Project Mobile Functionality
N/A
N/A
Definable Resource Pools
N/A
N/A
Procurement (5)
N/A
N/A
Bids Analyzed and Compared
N/A
N/A
Contract Authoring
N/A
N/A
Contract Repository
N/A
N/A
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
N/A
N/A
Supplier Management
N/A
N/A
Risk Management (5)
N/A
N/A
Risk Repository
N/A
N/A
Control Management
N/A
N/A
Control Efficiency Assessments
N/A
N/A
Issue Detection
N/A
N/A
Remediation and Certification
N/A
N/A
Logistics (5)
N/A
N/A
Transportation Planning and Optimization
N/A
N/A
Transportation Execution Management
N/A
N/A
Trade and Customs Management
N/A
N/A
Fulfillment Management
N/A
N/A
Warehouse Workforce Management
N/A
N/A
Manufacturing (5)
12%
1.2
Production Process Design
20%
2.0
Production Management
N/A
N/A
Configuration Management
N/A
N/A
Work Execution
20%
2.0
Manufacturing Costs
20%
2.0
Supply Chain (3)
6.666666666666666%
0.7
Forecasting
N/A
N/A
Inventory Planning
20%
2.0
Performance Monitoring
N/A
N/A
Product Lifecycle Management (2)
10%
1.0
Proposal Management
N/A
N/A
Product Master Data Management
20%
2.0
Return on Investment
  • On the positive side, we are able to track actual cost of products to make educated product strategy decisions based on profitability.
  • On the negative side, we have required a lot of outside support to write macros and outside reports in order to get valuable data. Additionally, we have struggled to get 3rd party software to communicate effectively with VISUAL to support transportation/logistics, product configuration, labor tracking, etc.
Alternatives Considered
We unfortunately did not evaluate any other ERP software. VISUAL was a legacy system and we determined that changing systems would be too difficult, and not cost effective. We reached out to our local VISUAL rep who knew how the software functioned, but not how to apply it more appropriately to our business model, so we continued on with what we had rather than looking elsewhere.
Other Software Used
Autodesk Inventor, Microsoft 365 Business
November 21, 2018

adequate,but limited

Dave Hail | TrustRadius Reviewer
Dave Hail
Quality and Manufacturing Engineer
At home (Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing, 51-200 employees)
Score 5 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
Infor Visual was selected as as an enterprise wide tool for accounting, MRP, manufacturing process control, and inventory control for US operations. It was selected as a Y2K solution to the home-grown MRP system used at that time. The software helped the design of process control for business and manufacturing, document control for BOM design and changes as well as business information for labor and material costing to develop costing models for sales. The quality control modules were not used.
Pros and Cons
  • Infor Visual has a standard way of addressing business operations: sales orders, invoicing, reporting. It is easy to train operators used to using a manual or other ERP system.
  • Material control is easy for production runs, R&D material lists and repairs. The process of receiving, issuing and returning material to inventory is facilitated by standard interfaces that are easily learned by material control operators.
  • Engineering changes to bills of material are facilitated by the "engineering Master" flexible editing capability. The version control for the BOM's can be as detailed or vague as the process designed dictates. One item of a BOM or the entire BOM can be changed quickly and approved for production that day.
  • At times a "shadow part" is necessary in the manufacturing process. This shadow part does not require an inventory transaction but is made a as a separate process - sometimes out of sequence to the general process flow. Infor Visual ver 6.3.5 does not have that capability.
  • When generating forms for business and manufacturing operations Infor Visual ver 6.3.5 has a limited number of options. To change or add forms requires an unsupported editor. When the stock and custom options are depleted an outside programming module is required as well as programmers to develop the forms.
  • While free software upgrades to the main operations modules have been part of the maintenance agreement. One upgrade required database and hardware support not justifiable for the current business model. The system was frozen at the current version at that time.
  • There is no easy way to differentiate between engineering documentation and production documentation.
Likelihood to Recommend
The original version of Visual Manufacturing (Lilly Software) was intended for mechanical manufacturing. It was adapted at our facility (we were not the first) to accomodate electronic manufacturing. For electronic manufacturing process control it is not ideal when referencing in-line or custom processes used to build product. For material control it is excellent unless a modification to a standard product is required (and we did this on 60% of product going out the door). The co-product feature that removes material from an assembly requires the creator of the work order to calculate the percentage of cost the removed items are from the completed product.
On the business operations side regional tax reports were difficult to extract and an external module to go into the data base and extract that had to be created.

The system itself was stable for the most part. Occasional "data collisions" corrupted transactions at times. The accounting procedures in place found them by the end of the month .where they were corrected.
For a small business with less formal processes Infor Visual can be used with little training for the operators. If the processes need a higher level of accountability and control the processes can be formalized with workflow scripts to ensure that higher level of control.
Infor VISUAL Feature Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting (7)
88.57142857142858%
8.9
Accounts payable
80%
8.0
Accounts receivable
90%
9.0
Global Financial Support
90%
9.0
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
90%
9.0
Journals and Reconciliations
90%
9.0
Configurable Accounting
90%
9.0
Standardized Processes
90%
9.0
Subledger and Financial Process (5)
18%
1.8
Billing Management
N/A
N/A
Cash and Asset Management
N/A
N/A
Travel & Expense Management
N/A
N/A
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
N/A
N/A
Period Close
90%
9.0
Inventory Management (3)
56.66666666666667%
5.7
Inventory tracking
100%
10.0
Automatic reordering
N/A
N/A
Location management
70%
7.0
Order Management (5)
42%
4.2
Pricing
60%
6.0
Order entry
80%
8.0
Credit card processing
N/A
N/A
Cost of goods sold
70%
7.0
Order Orchestration
N/A
N/A
Payroll Management (3)
N/A
N/A
Pay calculation
N/A
N/A
Benefit plan administration
N/A
N/A
Direct deposit files
N/A
N/A
Reporting & Analytics (3)
36.666666666666664%
3.7
Dashboards
20%
2.0
Standard reports
70%
7.0
Custom reports
20%
2.0
Customization (2)
N/A
N/A
API for custom integration
N/A
N/A
Plug-ins
N/A
N/A
Security (2)
90%
9.0
Role-based user permissions
90%
9.0
Single sign-on capability
90%
9.0
Grants Management (1)
N/A
N/A
Award Lifecycle Management
N/A
N/A
Project Financial Management (5)
26%
2.6
Budgeting and Forecasting
N/A
N/A
Project Costing
50%
5.0
Cost Capture
80%
8.0
Capital Project Management
N/A
N/A
Project Revenue Recognition
N/A
N/A
Project Execution Management (2)
N/A
N/A
Project Planning and Scheduling
N/A
N/A
Definable Resource Pools
N/A
N/A
Procurement (2)
N/A
N/A
Bids Analyzed and Compared
N/A
N/A
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
N/A
N/A
Risk Management
N/A
N/A
Logistics
N/A
N/A
Manufacturing (4)
57.5%
5.8
Production Process Design
50%
5.0
Production Management
50%
5.0
Configuration Management
50%
5.0
Manufacturing Costs
80%
8.0
Supply Chain (2)
N/A
N/A
Forecasting
N/A
N/A
Inventory Planning
N/A
N/A
Product Lifecycle Management
N/A
N/A
Return on Investment
  • I cannot comment on business impact.
Alternatives Considered
SAP Business One was selected for the China Division for cost and ease of training reasons. It does not have the capabilities required for the main office accounting or product engineering. It also was not available at the time of Visual Manufacturing selection.
Epicor Eclipse was not available at the time of Visual Manufacturing selection. It has many if the features lacking in Infor Visual and integrates better with SalesForce.com CRM. Epicor is one of the upgrade systems that are being considered.
SAP ERP is a large piece of software that requires long planning, implementation and training cycles. Its complexity requires a large support contingent even in a cloud implementation.
November 13, 2015

Visual 8.0 & VTA Review.

Verified User
Manager in Human Resources
Plastics Company, 501-1000 employees
Score 2 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
We have been using the Visual Time & Attendance (VTA) module for approximately a year now. We are in the middle of our implementation into Visual 8.0 across the whole organization.

Visual 8.0 will be used enterprise wide. We merged with a larger company 14 months ago and we are now in the process of combining systems into Visual. It will handle our accounting systems and scheduling.
Pros and Cons
  • Visual provides a one-stop shop for our organization.
  • VTA has been extremely unreliable. I would not recommend it. It is not customizable at all. There is no logical way to handle shift differentials which is a huge issue with a company that runs 24/7.
  • If you do not have a schedule set up, they cannot clock in. This poses a problem for anyone that gets called in on a shift they don't normally work on.
Likelihood to Recommend
I would ask about the customization features and the costs associated with getting the system to actually work the way you need it to.
Infor VISUAL Feature Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting (2)
50%
5.0
Accounts payable
50%
5.0
Accounts receivable
50%
5.0
Subledger and Financial Process
N/A
N/A
Inventory Management (3)
36.666666666666664%
3.7
Inventory tracking
60%
6.0
Automatic reordering
N/A
N/A
Location management
50%
5.0
Order Management (4)
45%
4.5
Pricing
60%
6.0
Order entry
60%
6.0
Credit card processing
N/A
N/A
Cost of goods sold
60%
6.0
Payroll Management (3)
N/A
N/A
Pay calculation
N/A
N/A
Benefit plan administration
N/A
N/A
Direct deposit files
N/A
N/A
Reporting & Analytics (3)
N/A
N/A
Dashboards
N/A
N/A
Standard reports
N/A
N/A
Custom reports
N/A
N/A
Customization (2)
N/A
N/A
API for custom integration
N/A
N/A
Plug-ins
N/A
N/A
Security (2)
N/A
N/A
Role-based user permissions
N/A
N/A
Single sign-on capability
N/A
N/A
Grants Management
N/A
N/A
Project Financial Management
N/A
N/A
Project Execution Management
N/A
N/A
Procurement
N/A
N/A
Risk Management
N/A
N/A
Logistics
N/A
N/A
Manufacturing
N/A
N/A
Supply Chain
N/A
N/A
Product Lifecycle Management
N/A
N/A
Return on Investment
  • Will increase efficiency, will streamline our processes, especially in Customer Service and Scheduling.
Alternatives Considered
VTA doesn't even come close to Ascentis in the realm of timekeeping.
Users and Roles
750
Top to bottom - the whole organization will be using Infor Visual from our operators entering their part counts and times to the CFO getting financials.
Support Headcount Required
5
IT support group
Business Processes Supported
  • Scheduling/inventory management
  • Order processing and bidding
  • Accounting
Likelihood to Renew
8
It is unlikely that we would spend the money and time it takes to make a switch again in the near future.
Implementation Details / Implementation Partner
  • Vendor implemented
Implementation Phases
No
Change Management Lessons
Change management was a big part of the implementation and was well-handled
It is hard to teach an old dog new tricks. The new systems are very intimidating for our more tenured employees.
Implementation Issues
  • Getting down into the nitty gritty of what we need to have happen compared to what we are doing now.
Implementation Rating
2
Could have used more hands-on approach. There are multiple webinars and information sessions but until you actually use the system, these are not very helpful.
Premium Support
No
Our company expects our IT team to handle the VTA system due to the costs for support. They are not qualified to do this and makes things more difficult than need be.
Support Rating
2
Costly
Bug Resolution
No
Exceptional Examples of Infor VISUAL Support
Not at all. I haven't even tried.
Easy Tasks
  • None
Difficult Tasks
  • Finding the correct module is confusing. The user interface is not very user friendly.
  • The layout of the screens are confusing.
Usability
2
If you are not very computer literate, this is a difficult system to learn.
February 04, 2014

INFOR ERP Due Diligence Report

charles devine | TrustRadius Reviewer
charles devine
Operations Planning
Genesis Biotechnology Group (Telecommunications, 11-50 employees)
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
INFOR ERP was used by Finance, Sales, and Operations groups.Application was used to address problems with demand planning, job costing, production scheduling, inventory management, and shop floor planning. INFOR ERP was also used to convert financials from QuickBooks. It is also used for Sales Order Creation and Tracking for domestic and international orders.
Pros and Cons
  • User Friendly
  • Good technical support
  • Reasonably priced
  • Good Customer Support for Implementation
  • Improved handling for alternates in Bill of Materials
  • Improved financial reporting capability
  • Improved GUI functionality
Likelihood to Recommend

High Level of functionality in Manufacturing Execution and Shop Floor Planning.

Needs improvement with Financial Budgeting module.

Financial Reporting Capability such as Consolidated Reports and Cash Flow Analysis.

Improvement with Ad Hoc Reporting functionality

Return on Investment
  • Improved response for customer inquiries and price quotation generation
  • Improved Inventory Accuracy from 91% to 96%
  • Reduced order cycle time (Order to Cash) by 10%
Alternatives Considered
In Vendor/Application Selection INFOR ERP rated high in Production Capability and Shop Floor Management. INFOR ERP was weaker in financials. INFOR ERP appears to be strong for retail and order (pick/pack/ship) fulfillment operations. INFOR ERP Management offered aggressive pricing and was willing to be flexible for other software and implementation costs.
Likelihood to Renew
7

Good Technical and Customer Support during and after implementation tasks.

Good Project Plan and Management support for implementation and post implementation.

Financial functionality could be more comprehensive particularly with Budgeting and Cash Management.

Inventory Management capability was adequate but could be more comprehensive as well.

"Out of the Box" functionality was adequate but requested add-ons and enhancements seemed to be a bit pricey.

Return to navigation