Sage Intacct Reviews

Kronos was more complicated, I used it previously at my older company, but it was also very competitive, had more clicks and tabs. Intacct is more user friendly and I get the job done faster. Time is of the essence here and Intacct serves that purpose.

Years ago, I worked for Oracle and after, I did a rapid Oracle Financials implementation for a resort company with 31 different hotels. That went well. Over the years, I have had experience when I needed Oracle support and it was horrible. That was the main reason I chose Sage Intacct.

Throughout the Sage Intact process, Sage support has been great.

Originally we were using QuickBooks but as the company grew we needed to migrate to a platform that was more capable with our future needs. Our top two choices were Intacct and Netsuite. We choose Intacct over Netsuite despite it being a newer program. Our managers both agreed that Intacct offered more customization and a better "hands on approach" vs automation.

Sage Intacct is superior than these systems. We reviewed them during RFP process and picked Sage Intaccts for its ease of use, cloud platform capabilities and ability to customize.

Intacct is truly a full functioning accounting system. It has the internal controls as well as some good self auditing functions built into the system. This for me is what sets it apart from other accounting systems.

We migrated from QuickBooks Enterprise Solutions. Due to a company restructure, we outgrew QuickBooks. We evaluated several different solutions before deciding on Sage Intacct. We liked that we would not have to pay for upgrades or have any downtime with Sage Intacct. We also liked the functionality of the system. The user interface was cleaner and easier to navigate.

Pentagon 2000 is a specific program for the aviation industry that we considered. But in the end, we wanted ease of access to data and streamlined reporting.

We evaluated both products however Acumatica was more geared towards manufacturing companies that use the inventory module. As we do not keep inventory at our company we found Sage Intacct to be more friendly to nonfinancial users, of which we have 20+ in the system. We also thought the VAR helping us install the system was a better fit as a partner.

Much more robust and easier to integrate.

We haven't searched for anything else. VP Controller doesn't like change.

The Microsoft products seem to be stuck in the last century. Intacct's GUI is cleaner, more intuitive for the non-accounting user, and allows for more reporting customization.

I have never held a position that required me to view or manage billing so this is the only software I have used in this capacity.

I think these are the two best options out there. I can't speak to which one is better as we went with Sage over NetSuite for rev rec options, but I think both can deliver. After some initial hurdles, we are operating very smoothly with Intacct and adding on new software as we go.

Financial Edge was not built to be a cloud-based platform, and it was VERY evident. Only a very small portion of the functions have switched to the new UI, and most of them are still older systems with a new face. It was very clear that Sage Intacct was built from the ground up to be a cloud-based provider.

None. During my time with this business, we already had Sage Intacct and are very happy with it. I do not know what was used prior to this software. We do have some software's that we use along with Intacct to compliment and provide us with the data that our department needs.

No question, Intacct is a vastly better product that the QuickBooks products. The internal controls are so much stronger and pass audits with flying colors. The audit trail that we get from Intacct is also helpful in producing supporting documentation for our auditors when requested to do so. We found QuickBooks to be nothing more than a glorified checkbook with some cute GUIs. Intacct however is a true accounting system.

We looked at Blackbaud and Shelby and found Sage Intacct to be the most flexible and robust program we reviewed.

For my needs and the way we use volunteers to help with our accounting functions, Intacct is in a class above.

I have used QuickBooks Online at a much smaller company. It was fine for the size of the company, but every process was so manual. I could not imagine being at a bigger company using QuickBooks Online. Sage Intacct meets the Accounting software needs of bigger companies. QuickBooks Online would not be able to match up.

We evaluated Netsuite as well and found it to be bulky and cumbersome.

Sage Intacct is obviously a huge step up from Quickbooks, which is what we used prior to making the switch.

We selected Sage Intacct because we believe it will grow with us well into the future, wherever our strategy plans takes the organization.

Sage Intacct is much more powerful, but it is more difficult to learn and administer.