Overview
What is Ironclad?
Ironclad, from the company of the same name in San Francisco, is designed to streamline every part of the contract process—so users can focus on legal work, not paperwork.
IronClad allows keeping track and approving legal workflows quickly and efficiently
Well design CLM tool for digitalizing contract process.
Ironclad is a wonderful tool for internal legal teams
Pricing
What is Ironclad?
Ironclad, from the company of the same name in San Francisco, is designed to streamline every part of the contract process—so users can focus on legal work, not paperwork.
Entry-level set up fee?
- No setup fee
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?
46 people also want pricing
Alternatives Pricing
What is INHUBBER?
Contract lifecycle management platform with cloud security, digital signature and AI-powered document management. AI helps customers simplify contract management by making it understandable, interactive and automated. Digital signature signs any file format along with text and images.
Product Details
- About
- Tech Details
What is Ironclad?
Ironclad Video
Ironclad Technical Details
Operating Systems | Unspecified |
---|---|
Mobile Application | No |
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(17)Community Insights
- Business Problems Solved
- Pros
- Cons
- Recommendations
IronClad offers users a range of valuable use cases, allowing them to streamline their contract workflows and stay organized. With its automation capabilities, the software enables sales staff to generate commercial contracts for various products, each with unique pricing logic and terms and conditions. By automating contract review, IronClad reduces the need for manual intervention from the legal team, ensuring compliance across the business. Users appreciate the organizational features of IronClad, including its intake and repository functions that make their jobs easier. Additionally, IronClad facilitates efficient generation, review, and signing of agreements while maintaining a searchable repository of all signed contracts. The integration with DocuSign and Salesforce further simplifies the finalization of agreements by eliminating the need for multiple tools. Furthermore, IronClad solves the problem of decentralized documents by keeping all contracts in one secure location, making retrieval efficient. Additionally, it assists in archiving older legacy contracts. Users find value in IronClad for maintaining contract histories, communicating with the legal team, and ensuring transparency in processes. The software also provides valuable insights through reporting features and supports effective management of partnership agreements. Overall, IronClad is considered a reliable document rendering tool that streamlines contract management processes and improves efficiency by providing a centralized repository for contracts.
Customization Options: Users appreciate Ironclad's customization options for business users and legal teams, allowing them to ask for specific information and trigger conditional actions, which has saved time and provided valuable data. This pro was mentioned by several reviewers.
Efficient Workflows: The workflows in Ironclad are praised for their seamless integration and efficiency in inputting agreement data, gathering internal approvals, and tracking document signing. Many users have highlighted this as a key advantage of the platform.
Central Repository: Ironclad is commended for acting as a central repository and archive for complex legal tasks, providing users with easy access to the history they need for any task. Several reviewers have mentioned this as a positive aspect of the software.
Confusing and unintuitive user interface: Many users have expressed frustration with Ironclad's confusing and unintuitive user interface, describing it as difficult to navigate and perform tasks efficiently. They have mentioned that the layout and organization of features are not intuitive, leading to a steep learning curve.
Insufficient editing capabilities: Some users find the editing capabilities of Ironclad to be insufficient and challenging. They have mentioned the need for advanced knowledge of HTML to make desired edits. Additionally, users have reported having to delete and re-upload documents for more complex edits, which can be time-consuming and inefficient.
High costs hindering growth: Numerous users have identified the high costs associated with Ironclad's license model as a hindrance to their business growth. The pricing structure has been seen as prohibitive for smaller companies or those with limited budgets, potentially limiting their ability to fully utilize Ironclad's features and scale their operations effectively.
Users of Ironclad have made several recommendations based on their experiences with the platform. The three most common recommendations are as follows:
-
Trust the process of setting up Ironclad, despite potential frustrations. Users recommend trusting the implementation process of Ironclad, acknowledging that there may be initial frustrations. This indicates that users believe in the effectiveness of Ironclad and its ability to provide positive outcomes in contract renewals and collaboration.
-
Implement Ironclad in steps for better adoption and learning. It is recommended to implement Ironclad gradually, allowing users to adapt to the platform and learn its features effectively. This suggests that users find Ironclad to be a powerful tool but also acknowledge the need for a structured approach to ensure successful adoption across the organization.
-
Be mindful of the license model and company's growth when using Ironclad. Users advise being cautious about the license model of Ironclad and considering the company's future growth plans. This recommendation highlights the importance of aligning the usage of Ironclad with the organization's long-term needs and scalability.
These recommendations encompass important aspects such as trust in the implementation process, gradual adoption to enhance user learning, and considering licensing and growth factors for optimal utilization of Ironclad.
Attribute Ratings
Reviews
(1-3 of 3)- Keep track of legal documents versions
- Approve legal workflows
- Forward email threads to the legal workflow
- The title given to each workflow is assigned automatically and this can be confusing
- The user interface could be improved to better differentiate internal and external workflows
- The workflow email could be more easily accessible, e.g. provide a copy workflow email button
- Contract creation
- 80%8.0
- Contract templates
- 80%8.0
- Clause library/saved fields
- N/AN/A
- Guided logic
- N/AN/A
- Contract sharing
- 80%8.0
- Contract editing
- 80%8.0
- Collaborating on contracts
- 90%9.0
- MS Word plug-in
- 80%8.0
- Approval process
- 90%9.0
- Interdepartmental workflows
- 90%9.0
- Contract database
- 90%9.0
- Contract search
- 60%6.0
- Contract milestone reminders & alerts
- 80%8.0
- Custom contract reports
- 90%9.0
- Tracking contract status
- 90%9.0
- Compliance check
- N/AN/A
- Faster turnaround for legal agreements
- Accountability on legal collaborators
- Faster approval process
- Salesforce Lightning Platform (formerly Salesforce App Cloud), Advanced ALB Legal Software and DocuSign
Well design CLM tool for digitalizing contract process.
- Very flexible workflow design tool.
- Functions are fine-tuned but not too much.
- Easily understandable product which user can handle.
- Contract link feature in the case of amendment/addendum.
- Auto document retention feature (expiration and deletion).
- Contract creation
- 100%10.0
- Contract templates
- 90%9.0
- Clause library/saved fields
- 80%8.0
- Guided logic
- 90%9.0
- Contract sharing
- 100%10.0
- Contract editing
- 70%7.0
- Collaborating on contracts
- 100%10.0
- MS Word plug-in
- 90%9.0
- Approval process
- 70%7.0
- Interdepartmental workflows
- 80%8.0
- Contract database
- 90%9.0
- Contract search
- 70%7.0
- Contract milestone reminders & alerts
- 50%5.0
- Custom contract reports
- 80%8.0
- Tracking contract status
- 90%9.0
- Compliance check
- 70%7.0
- Increased employee efficiency.
- Easily supervised contract application status.
- Easily managed active/inactive contracts.
Ironclad is a wonderful tool for internal legal teams
- Ironclad is extremely easy to use, without providing much specific direction to new users.
- It's wonderful to be able to capture the progress of contracts and requests as well as the notes regarding the status.
- It's easy to tag another colleague into a workflow for their input and approvals as necessary.
- Once you add someone into a workflow there is no way to remove them. It would be nice to be able to get out of a workflow or remove someone.
- The "assignment" function could be more clear for those individuals who don't regularly use Ironclad. Perhaps prompting them on how to upload a signed agreement if they are not the owner of the workflow.
- Contract creation
- N/AN/A
- Contract templates
- 100%10.0
- Clause library/saved fields
- 100%10.0
- Contract sharing
- 100%10.0
- Contract editing
- 100%10.0
- Collaborating on contracts
- 100%10.0
- Approval process
- 100%10.0
- Interdepartmental workflows
- 100%10.0
- Contract search
- 100%10.0
- Positive - Increased efficiency, as all work into the legal department flows into Ironclad. We can see where resources are being spent and which internal business partners are utilizing the legal department the most.
- Positing - Better internal business partner service. We are able to communicate directly with our internal partners as to the status of their request and keep them apprised where we are in the negotiation process, etc.