TestMu AI

Score8.9 out of 10

220 Reviews and Ratings

What is TestMu AI?

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) is a Full-Stack Quality Engineering platform that empowers teams to test intelligently and ship faster. Engineered for scale, it offers end-to-end AI agents to plan, author, execute, and analyze software quality. The platform enables testing of web, mobile, and enterprise applications at any scale across real devices, real browsers, and custom real-world environments.

Categories & Use Cases

Media

Screenshot of Automation testing on Lambdatest

Screenshot of Some of the available integrations.

1 / 10

Screenshot of An automated screenshot.

#1 most frequent

Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

29.6%

139 installations of 469

“I used LambdaTest as a tester to test the product on different virtual devices. Which helps me to understand about how I can enhance the user experience of the product. Due to it cross browsing functionality I can test my product performance under different browser including to their version under one roof.”
— Quality Assurance Engineer, Technobot System Pvt Ltd (11-50 employees)

#2 most frequent

Information

20.0%

94 installations of 469

#3 most frequent

Finance and Insurance

12.8%

60 installations of 469

emma buttery

SDET in Quality Assurance at Direct ferries (51-200 employees employees)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Using LambdaTest to ensure our website and native app work with multiple devices as well as running our appium automation for the app on actual devices remotely. We had a trial for web automation (which we decided not to go ahead with at the moment) and also smart UI for more continuous testing on a storybook project.

Pros

UI is very nice
Customer support is very good when needed
works reliably

Cons

Some documentation can be confusing
Some documentation is also out of date

Return on Investment

Usability

Alternatives Considered

BrowserStack

Verified User

Engineer in Quality Assurance (51-200 employees employees)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

In our case, we use TestMu to test a mobile app on different real devices. This allows us to assess performance across the major brands of mobile devices. This is the main reason: functional testing is an important part of detecting problems or errors in a workflow that could impact our operations. By being able to test on different devices without location restrictions and leveraging both Android and iOS operating systems, we can ensure the proper functioning of our app.

Pros

app debugging
functional mobile test

Cons

at the moment all works for us

Return on Investment

less bugs on prod enviroment equal to Less impact on the development budget.
Shorter feedback cycle: Thanks to its HyperExecute technology, tests can run up to 70% faster than on traditional clouds.
Testing on real mobile devices ensures flawless performance in iOS or Android.

Usability

Other Software Used

Cursor, GitHub Copilot

Verified User

Engineer in Engineering (5001-10,000 employees employees)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We're using it mainly for regression testing, it's important for us to make sure our product is stable, even when new features or fixes has been implemented. Right now the scope is iOS and Android devices, sometimes in manual side we're using also iPad and Android tablets. Finally to test a webview we're using also browser in Linux OS

Pros

Logs for device
Web interface is clean
Pulling locators from native apps while I'm doing manual checking

Cons

Coverage of devices
Implement Roku
Implement AndroidTV
Availability of devices, sometimes in automated side my tests fail because it seems there aren't enough devices of e.g. Android Motorola, then I modified my tests to use mainly Samsung and Pixel

Return on Investment

Enhance confidence when facing releases
Get focused in manual tests for features to be released, as regression is covering all developed before
Time to market is less by the use of Automation

Usability

Alternatives Considered

BrowserStack

Other Software Used

Selenium, OpenJDK, Playwright

Verified User

Employee in Quality Assurance (201-500 employees employees)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We used LambdaTest to functionally test and validate key aspects of our journal application: such as functionality of media viewing, polls, education workflows, account signup, subscription flows, ect. Along with the respective responsive and visual aspects of those flows. LambdaTest is especially important to us as a consistent environment for cross-browser and device testing in a remote QA team, as it enables us to test our website against a wide variety of mobile device sizes, OS, and browsers.

Pros

Variety of testing devices and browsers
Mapping of Desktop interaction to mobile touch
Fast spin-up and spin-down
Easy screenshotting and video recording feature
Ease of use as a tester

Cons

Latency and flakiness of some mobile touch, especially on iOS
Slower spin-up and spin-down for iOS devices
Not easy to zoom in to read small text

Return on Investment

Fast test execution

Usability

Ahsan Noor View profile

Head of Technology in Information Technology at Vintara International (1-10 employees employees)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use LambdaTest for quick cross browser testing because our users come from different devices. It helps us catch UI bugs we usually miss locally.It basically solve the problem of inconsistent behavior across browsers.

Pros

UI comparisation
Automation
Cross browser testing

Cons

Pricing will be little bit cheaper
Real devices are little bit laggy
Session disconnect issue happened sometimes

Return on Investment

It saves about 10-20% of our time
Automation runs very well
It make user experience better as we have already ensure about the errors because of Lambdatest

Usability

Other Software Used

LinkedIn Jobs, Canva, Google Chrome

TestMu AI

What is TestMu AI?

Categories & Use Cases

Media

Most Frequent Users

Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Information

Finance and Insurance

TestMu AI Reviews

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Pros

Cons

Return on Investment

Usability

Alternatives Considered

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Pros

Cons

Return on Investment

Usability

Other Software Used

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Pros

Cons

Return on Investment

Usability

Alternatives Considered

Other Software Used

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Pros

Cons

Return on Investment

Usability

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Pros

Cons

Return on Investment

Usability

Other Software Used

TestMu AI Alternatives