LoadComplete

LoadComplete

About TrustRadius Scoring
Score 7.8 out of 100
LoadComplete

Overview

Recent Reviews

Read all reviews

Popular Features

View all 5 features
  • End to end performance management (5)
    8.1
    81%
  • Real time monitoring (5)
    7.8
    78%
  • Deployment model flexibility (5)
    6.6
    66%

Video Reviews

Leaving a video review helps other professionals like you evaluate products. Be the first one in your network to record a review of LoadComplete, and make your voice heard!

Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing
N/A
Unavailable

What is LoadComplete?

SmartBear LoadComplete is a performance, stress and load testing tool for web and Rich Internet Applications, including ASP.NET, Ajax, Flash/Flex and Silverlight.

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting / Integration Services

Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?

4 people want pricing too

Alternatives Pricing

What is Rapise?

Rapise is a software testing platform that allows users to regression test web, desktop and mobile applications. Some key features include: Playback of Tests, Test Script Editing and Data Driven Testing.

What is Harness?

Harness, from the company of the same name in San Francisco, is a Continuous Delivery-as-a-Service platform designed to provide a simple, safe and secure way for engineering and DevOps teams to release applications into production. Founded in 2016, Harness uses machine learning to detect the…

Return to navigation

Features Scorecard

Load Testing

8.0
80%
Return to navigation

Product Details

What is LoadComplete?

SmartBear LoadComplete is a performance, stress and load testing tool for web and Rich Internet Applications, including ASP.NET, Ajax, Flash/Flex and Silverlight.

LoadComplete Competitors

LoadComplete Technical Details

Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo

Frequently Asked Questions

LambdaTest are common alternatives for LoadComplete.

Reviewers rate Integrated performance data highest, with a score of 9.3.

The most common users of LoadComplete are from Mid-sized Companies (51-1,000 employees) and the Computer Software industry.
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

 (6)

Ratings

Reviews

(1-5 of 5)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
If you are testing an application and you don't have experience in performance testing, this tool will help you to test the load with some documentation help. It's very easy to use. and if you have complex scenarios to determine the coding and adjusting graphs, the LoadComplete will not be a helpful tool for you.
Kate Woodward | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
I think that LoadComplete is adequate when you have Testcomplete. If LoadComplete is not paired with Testcomplete then there would be a bit of a learning curve. People who are already using Testcomplete will find it easy to start with LoadComplete but the tool itself has a lot to improve and support customization to suit our needs.
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
If we already use TestComplete for test automation and there is an urgent need to perform load testing, then it is easy to start with LoadComplete but the tool itself has to improve a lot and support customization to suit our needs. I would say if load testing is the main criteria to use this tool, then there are other open-source tools like JMeter that can support better than this. Of course, as it is an enterprise tool it has very good reporting and record and playback options that I see as an advantage for basic users.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
Loadcomplete is well suited if you have testcomplete. The ability to port over automation tests to turn into Performance tests is one of the best features the company can offer. With the proper training anyone can use loadcomplete, especially if you write your own scripts.

If loadcomplete is not paired with testcomplete, there could be a bit of a learning curve. One feature I don't like about LoadComplete is the lack to write your own scripts. You must do the play back, record and update several variables if you are to have dynamic tests.
Return to navigation