Skip to main content
TrustRadius
LoadComplete

LoadComplete

Overview

What is LoadComplete?

SmartBear LoadComplete is a performance, stress and load testing tool for web and Rich Internet Applications, including ASP.NET, Ajax, Flash/Flex and Silverlight.

Read more
Recent Reviews
Read all reviews

Awards

Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards

Popular Features

View all 5 features
  • End to end performance management (5)
    8.4
    84%
  • Real time monitoring (5)
    7.9
    79%
  • Deployment model flexibility (5)
    6.9
    69%
Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing

Subscription Starter

$239

Cloud
per month 100 virtual users

On-demand Starter

$287

Cloud
one-time fee 100 virtual users

Subscription Pro

$699

Cloud
per month 1000 virtual users

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee
For the latest information on pricing, visithttps://loadninja.com/pricing

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting/Integration Services

Starting price (does not include set up fee)

  • $287 one-time fee
Return to navigation

Product Demos

Pagination in LoadComplete 2.6 Demo

YouTube
Return to navigation

Features

Load Testing

Load testing is the simplest form of performance testing and is designed to test system behavior under expected loads

8.2
Avg 8.4
Return to navigation

Product Details

What is LoadComplete?

SmartBear LoadComplete is a performance, stress and load testing tool for web and Rich Internet Applications, including ASP.NET, Ajax, Flash/Flex and Silverlight.

LoadComplete Competitors

LoadComplete Technical Details

Deployment TypesSoftware as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based
Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo

Frequently Asked Questions

LoadComplete starts at $287.

LambdaTest, TestRail, and Rainforest QA are common alternatives for LoadComplete.

Reviewers rate Integrated performance data highest, with a score of 9.5.

The most common users of LoadComplete are from Mid-sized Companies (51-1,000 employees).
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(6)

Attribute Ratings

Reviews

(1-1 of 1)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
September 28, 2020

LoadComplete for basic load testing

Verified User
Team Lead in Quality Assurance
Computer Software Company, 1001-5000 employees
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
LoadComplete is used to evaluate the load testing process. We already had TestComplete for test automation so we started to use LoadComplete for load testing.
Pros and Cons
  • Easy and handy UI options to select
  • Good support from documentation
  • Eye-catching results
  • Slow when the size of tests increase
  • Coding is not possible
  • Need to support flexibility for a framework that can be customized based on needs
Likelihood to Recommend
If we already use TestComplete for test automation and there is an urgent need to perform load testing, then it is easy to start with LoadComplete but the tool itself has to improve a lot and support customization to suit our needs. I would say if load testing is the main criteria to use this tool, then there are other open-source tools like JMeter that can support better than this. Of course, as it is an enterprise tool it has very good reporting and record and playback options that I see as an advantage for basic users.
LoadComplete Feature Ratings
Load Testing (5)
40%
4.0
End to end performance management
30%
3.0
Integrated performance data
70%
7.0
Deployment model flexibility
10%
1.0
Real time monitoring
50%
5.0
Automated anomaly detection
40%
4.0
Return on Investment
  • ROI is a different factor to consider.
  • Not a great tool for load testing if that is the real purpose.
  • JMeter being open-source can easily yield good ROI compared to LoadComplete.
Alternatives Considered
JMeter being an open-source tool has the advantage of no cost to purchase the tool. Of course, to work in JMeter, the tester needs extensive knowledge on the tool to create a framework but LoadComplete has the advantage there as it is easy to start with and does well if the purpose is only basic load testing.
Support Rating
8
Customer support is good. If any concerns are raised, they are usually resolved soon, but when questioned about a feature LoadComplete does not support, it usually takes more time to resolve.
Usability
9
Usability is really good because being an enterprise tool that might be an easy option to convince users to try this tool. It has a lot of easy-to-use, cool options.
Other Software Used
Return to navigation