MadCap Software

MadCap Software

About TrustRadius Scoring
Score 7.5 out of 100
MadCap Software

Overview

Recent Reviews

Read all reviews

Reviewer Pros & Cons

View all pros & cons

Video Reviews

Leaving a video review helps other professionals like you evaluate products. Be the first one in your network to record a review of MadCap Software, and make your voice heard!

Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing

MadCap Central

$1,500

On Premise
per year

MadCap Flare

$1,999

On Premise
per year

MadCap AMS

$2,999

On Premise
per year

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee
For the latest information on pricing, visithttps://www.madcapsoftware.com/pricing

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting / Integration Services

Starting price (does not include set up fee)

  • $167 per month
Return to navigation

Features Scorecard

No scorecards have been submitted for this product yet..
Return to navigation

Product Details

What is MadCap Software?

The MadCap Authoring and Management System (AMS) combines the power and security of on-premises authoring and publishing with the convenience of the cloud to provide a complete solution for content developers.

Maximize content reuse and streamline the creation and multi-channel delivery of self-service support sites and online Help, user guides, instruction manuals, interactive eLearning courses, product training, knowledge bases and more with the most efficient technical writing tools.


Formed in 2005 by industry veterans with decades of experience in the technical communication and content development industries, the vendor states that MadCap Software is now a trusted resource for more than 20,000 companies around the globe.

MadCap Software Features

  • Supported: Patented XML Editor
  • Supported: Advanced Single-source XML Authoring & Multi-channel Publishing
  • Supported: Import Support for a Rich Variety of Content Types
  • Supported: Responsive Layout Editor for True Responsive Content
  • Supported: Powerful Analysis and Reporting
  • Supported: Content Management and Source Control Support
  • Supported: Multilingual Web and Print Publishing from a Single Project

MadCap Software Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of

MadCap Software Video

MadCap Software Downloadables

MadCap Software Integrations

  • Integrated source control support includes: Subversion or Git or Microsoft Team Foundation Server or Perforce or SharePoint or MadCap Central.
  • Acrolinx and Tedopres for Simplified Technical English.
  • Salesforce Knowledge, ServiceNow and Zendesk Guide as additional publishing channels.

MadCap Software Competitors

MadCap Software Technical Details

Deployment TypesOn-premise
Operating SystemsWindows
Mobile ApplicationNo
Supported CountriesAll
Supported LanguagesUI is localized into Japanese, Chinese, French, and German. Our editor supports authoring content in all languages.

Frequently Asked Questions

MadCap Software, headquartered in La Jolla, offers MadCap Flare, a help authoring and technical writing tool featuring onboarding and support from MadCap, and a set of modules for designing advanced guides, aids, and web or application help aids.

MadCap Software starts at $167.

Adobe Robohelp and Heretto are common alternatives for MadCap Software.

The most common users of MadCap Software are from Mid-sized Companies (51-1,000 employees) and the Computer Software industry.
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

 (13)

Ratings

Reviews

(1-4 of 4)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
⚙ Kate Montressor ⚙ | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
Our team writes the technical documentation for all products that our company offers. We like the flexibility and control MadCap Flare gives us. We use Flare connected to Git, so we can take advantage of seamlessly sharing files, branching and merging, and content management. We take advantage of many Flare features, especially the powerful search engine and the ability to create filtered searches. We like the ability to customize our docs with our own javascript. Single-sourcing is easy with the ability to output to multiple formats, and using Snippets and Variables.
  • single-source features
  • powerful search engine
  • easy to publish to our website
  • We always need one more thing, but are able to adapt using our own code
We currently use Flare for end-user docs but are in the process of implementing it for our API documentation. Having the content broken down into separate topics makes it easy to edit and add content. The drag-and-drop TOC makes it easy to rearrange topic order. I have also used Flare for writing non-technical books, as the built-in features help keep me organized.
December 15, 2021

Works, technically.

Cameron Michael Rhoads | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 5 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
MadCap Flare is used by the technical writing team at my company. We use it to write and publish all of our documentation.
  • Snippets, variables, and conditioning are all good
  • Once you set it up, updating Help websites is easy.
  • I use it on a mac with windows parallel and it can be so buggy and laggy.
  • I would love it if the software was entirely cloud-based, like Google Docs.
  • Reviewing in Central is not a good experience, need better review functionality.
If you're just building a help website or maybe a lengthy user guide, MadCap is great.

If you're exporting your documents somewhere that doesn't support MadCap integration, there's a chance it'll be more of a headache. For example, we export a lot of our docs to an LMS, and it requires us to build each document on its own. So, even if we update a snippet, we have to re-upload all affected articles.
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
MadCap Flare is our primary authoring software as a technical writing team of 8. We use MadCap Central as our source control service, as well as for reviewing internally and for SME reviews. We use MadCap Flare to build and publish our in-product help, as well, which is accessible to all clients as well as the company internally.
  • Using MadCap Flare to create and publish our in-product help is much easier than using the MadCap ZenDesk Connect plug-in to publish to ZenDesk (which we used previously). It allows for more customization (with a lot of know-how) and a much easier publishing process.
  • MadCap Central works well as a source control option with MadCap Flare, aside from bugs that arise. It's fully integrated with MadCap Flare, making it easy to send files for review to other colleagues.
  • MadCap Flare has many single-sourcing tools, I'm a particular fan of snippets and conditioning. Using snippets to create article templates (then converting to text) has been a valuable tool in improving consistency and efficiency.
  • I love being able to set customizable keyboard shortcuts, including using macros to assign shortcuts to complex actions. For example, I've been able to reassign a standard Ctrl + B shortcut to apply our custom bolding style, as opposed to default local bolding. Saves lots of time and effort to use my own shortcuts.
  • I've encountered a lot of buggy behavior with MadCap Central as a reviewing platform. On return to MadCap Flare, spaces will randomly vanish, locally-formatted red text will appear where annotations were, and variables will vanish. It can be hugely frustrating for errors to be introduced as part of the reviewing process.
  • MadCap Flare can be unstable. I am using it on Parallels on a Mac (sadly it's not supported for MacOS). It tends to freeze when syncing, crash if I scroll too quickly, and cause all sorts of other "oh god I hope I saved before that crashed" moments.
  • With an 8 member team, it's not uncommon to accidentally run into merge conflicts. The conflict manager tool is nigh-impossible to understand. I think we all just pick an option to accept or reject all changes, and pray.
  • The support system is very rigid as far as enforcing price vs access tiers, which can be frustrating when you're looking for support. For example, one person has Platinum support for their license key, so only they're authorized for phone support. Tying support to individual license keys without taking into consideration how many licenses our company pays for, and just giving us all the same level of support, is a bit bizarre.
  • MadCap Flare very much feels like a software begging for a total redesign. New features get jammed into an already-crowded toolbar. There's so many buttons that it's hard to find the ones you need. It needs a modern overhaul as well as overall performance upgrades.
  • I'd love to see improvements in MadCap Central as a reviewing tool. More support for rendering custom styles, being able to hide or show conditioned text, fixing the issue of it introducing errors, and making it overall a more pleasant reviewing experience for our SMEs.
MadCap Flare has its problems, but it serves our team well as an authoring software. This would not be the case if we needed to regularly collaborate on articles, as Flare is prone to conflict issues when another person dares to breathe near an open topic. When working individually, though, it's fine. I'd love to see improvements to design, performance, and stability, but Flare remains one of the best softwares on the market for our needs as an authoring team. MadCap Central is well-suited to internal reviewing when every member is comfortable with Flare (the errors it tends to introduce set aside). SMEs, though, tend to find it hard to use. It's cluttered, some styles don't render, and it just seems like a failed attempt to reproduce Google Docs. I'd love to see improvements there, to help get our SMEs to want to use Central.
Score 6 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We use MadCap for all of our technical writing needs. This includes product guides and software user manuals. The software addresses the need of hosting our documentation as well as allowing us to share documents with peers for review before publication. The software also (attempts) to address issues of single-source documentation through features such as Snippets and Variables, though this is often a pain point.

The software does allow for "conditioning" of certain content within a single document, allowing you to publish only certain parts of a document depending on where you're publishing it. For example, an Introduction paragraph might be necessary for learning materials but not in-product help. Conditioning allows for that. This is a feature we put to work quite often within our organization.
  • Organizing articles via an overall project outline.
  • Syncing with teammates.
  • The software is often quite buggy, and certain bugs seem to date back nearly a decade and still persist.
  • Customizing shortcuts is often an ordeal.
MadCap is well suited if you have a document that needs to be published in various locations, each with slightly tweaked content. It's easy enough to set certain paragraphs or sections to publish in a specific location but not others. MadCap is difficult to work with teammates. There are a lot of "rules" you have to stick to when syncing work to ensure one writer doesn't overwrite another's work.
Return to navigation