Mimecast Cloud Archive

Users are not able to delete emails hence Mimecast EIA becomes a very useful tool during e-discovery. For EOA, they offer an inplace archive which means that emails can be deleted if the service is not turned on.

Mimecast is overall a bit better value for the effort

The product offering is comparable, while the price is significantly less expensive in contrast to those offered by rivals. Additionally, the solution offers simple indexing and recovery, and it is nicely integrated into a variety of different ecosystems. Connecting across different cloud ecosystems like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud is made much simpler by the availability of a wide variety of connectors and APIs, which make this task quite straightforward.

The product offering is similar but the cost is lower in comparison to competitors. Also, the product is well integrated into various ecosystems and provides easy recovery and indexing. There are various connectors and APIs available which makes it easy to connect across various ecosystems like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud.

I was not involved in a decision-making process to purchase my podcast although I have used other tools in the past and my has the easiest interface to use And navigate. The learning curve is very short using this product. It’s a big benefit and plus that you were able to access it from a mobile device.

I have only ever compared it to Barracuda's Archive One which is no longer available or supported.

As opposed to its competitors, Mimecast Could Archive is a product designed IN the cloud. The other products were all basically traditional appliances hosted in the cloud and come with many limitations that Mimecast doesn't have.
The ease of management and use of Mimecast is above that of its competitors as it's intuitive and efficient.

Mimecast has been identified by Gartner as the top product in its magic quadrant. We found the product the easiest to implement with the best support and feature set. It has been very reliable and when we have had questions, feature requests or problems, the company has been quick to respond. They are constantly adding new features and it integrates well with Mimecast's malware and spam filtering applications.

Mimecast was a more complete and mature solution in our evaluation. Their services go far beyond just email archiving. Cost and the fact it is a cloud solution is a benefit.

One of the big features of Mimecast is the ability to send large files. We used to use CItrix Sharefile for this but switched over to Mimecast's LFS for one large reason...since we are archiving all of our mail in Mimeast anyway we would have wanted these attachments, even if large, also available to if we go back to look at old emails. However just for usability sake I think Citrix Sharefile's large file send is more polished and probably works a little better. We just choose to use the Mimecast so we had a one stop shop when it came to email archiving.