Skip to main content
TrustRadius
Mirantis Kubernetes Engine

Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
Formerly Docker Enterprise

Overview

What is Mirantis Kubernetes Engine?

The Mirantis Kubernetes Engine (formerly Docker Enterprise, acquired by Mirantis in November 2019)aims to let users ship code faster. Mirantis Kubernetes Engine gives users one set of APIs and tools to deploy, manage, and observe secure-by-default, certified, batteries-included Kubernetes clusters…

Read more
Recent Reviews

TrustRadius Insights

Docker has proven to be a versatile tool with a wide range of use cases. Users have found that Docker simplifies the packaging and …
Continue reading

Save space and time!

9 out of 10
March 15, 2021
Incentivized
Docker is heavily used to containerized the projects and upload it to kubernetes. It is helpful when developing microservices. Due to …
Continue reading

Productivity Booster

10 out of 10
August 14, 2019
Incentivized
Docker is used by most of our teams as part of their development and deployment practice. For development, it enables engineers to build …
Continue reading
Read all reviews
Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing

Free

$0.00

Cloud
per year

Basic

$500.00

Cloud
per year

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee
For the latest information on pricing, visithttps://store.mirantis.com

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting/Integration Services

Starting price (does not include set up fee)

  • $500 per year per node
Return to navigation

Product Details

What is Mirantis Kubernetes Engine?

Mirantis Kubernetes Engine Technical Details

Deployment TypesSoftware as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based
Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo

Frequently Asked Questions

The Mirantis Kubernetes Engine (formerly Docker Enterprise, acquired by Mirantis in November 2019)aims to let users ship code faster. Mirantis Kubernetes Engine gives users one set of APIs and tools to deploy, manage, and observe secure-by-default, certified, batteries-included Kubernetes clusters on any infrastructure: public cloud, private cloud, or bare metal.

Mirantis Kubernetes Engine starts at $500.

Reviewers rate Support Rating highest, with a score of 7.8.

The most common users of Mirantis Kubernetes Engine are from Enterprises (1,001+ employees).
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(213)

Community Insights

TrustRadius Insights are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, 3rd-party data sources. Have feedback on this content? Let us know!

Docker has proven to be a versatile tool with a wide range of use cases. Users have found that Docker simplifies the packaging and deployment of applications and services, allowing developers to match their development environment to production and eliminate cross-cutting software dependencies. It has been utilized as the backbone of a hosted app infrastructure, where every element is broken down into microservices deployed on the AWS cloud. Additionally, Docker has been instrumental in creating specialized microservices such as a Selenium Grid for automated web-based testing.

Moreover, Docker has played a crucial role in maintaining environmental consistency and streamlining deployment processes. It has enabled users to swiftly containerize Continuous Deployment and Integration pipelines, facilitating easy deployment and updates of the system and its environments. With Docker, users have been able to quickly deploy and monitor servers, firewalls, switches, and other components, providing a consistent and efficient environment for prototyping and testing. Another notable use case is spinning up new databases for microservices using Docker, ensuring consistency and independence across different environments.

Furthermore, Docker has integrated seamlessly with orchestration frameworks like Apache Mesos and Mesosphere Marathon. This combination has allowed for more efficient application development and deployment through effective management of containers. Docker has also demonstrated its utility in building server deployment files and running tests, enabling consistent deployments and reliable testing procedures.

In addition to these technical applications, Docker has proved to be valuable in hosting MySQL databases for production websites. Its stability, security features, and easy provisioning of identical instances have made it a preferred choice for users. Moreover, Docker has been extensively used in CI builds as it enables the creation of custom Linux images and seamless deployment of the latest code from the Docker registry.

The flexibility offered by Docker comes to the forefront when it comes to testing practices. It provides a highly configurable environment that makes cross-platform testing significantly more efficient. Users have leveraged Docker for both automated website/application testing pipelines as well as creating flexible environments for manual testing. Moreover, Docker has acted as a viable alternative to custom build and deploy solutions, offering a more flexible and decentralized process.

Notably, Docker has been embraced by a large global financial services provider to enhance efficiency and agility in application development. This adoption has resulted in increased innovation and productivity within the organization. Another significant benefit of using Docker is its ability to provide identical application environments across multiple deployment environments, leading to the deployment of more stable applications.

Furthermore, Docker has played a role in differentiating between server/compute infrastructure and application infrastructure. Operations teams can efficiently manage the cluster of servers, while application developers can run containers on the cluster, ensuring a clear separation and easier management of the two layers.

Teams have leveraged Docker for various development and deployment practices. Engineers can build applications in the same environment, eliminating local configuration issues that often arise when working across different setups. Docker has been particularly useful for WordPress development, replacing tools like Vagrant and providing tighter integration with Windows Hyper-V and better performance.

One of the significant advantages of Docker is its ability to containerize applications, resulting in consistent deployment environments across different stages and compatibility with various cloud platforms. This has greatly simplified the deployment process for users and enhanced their productivity. Additionally, Docker has been highly beneficial for the development team in resolving issues related to different setups on Windows, Linux, and Mac operating systems, while also providing easy configurations for automation QA.

Docker's impact extends beyond software development into the realm of research reproducibility. Users have developed Docker containers to encapsulate research pipelines, leveraging GitHub and DockerHub as public repositories. This approach has effectively addressed the challenge of ensuring reproducibility in research experiments.

Moreover, Docker Swarm has been employed to deploy internal applications in a managed cluster, successfully tackling scaling and load balancing issues during peak business hours. The combination of Docker with Kubernetes has also gained popularity among teams for containerizing projects and facilitating the development of microservices.

Overall, Docker's value proposition lies in its ability to provide consistent development environments, prevent deployment issues, streamline configurations, enhance testing efficiency, and simplify the overall software packaging and deployment processes. Its widespread usage across various industries highlights its robustness, ease of setup, community support through open-sourced images, and its ability to create and test configurations as needed. Docker has become an indispensable tool for many organizations seeking to optimize their software development lifecycle while improving productivity and innovation.

Based on the reviews, here are the three most common recommendations:

  1. Users recommend trying Docker for deploying web services and running micro-services. They suggest doing tutorials to learn how to create Dockerfiles and docker-compose files correctly. Additionally, they advise considering whether Docker is necessary or if statically linked binaries can be used instead.

  2. Users also recommend using Docker for QA environments and setting up developers with the environment they need. They find Docker to be an easy-to-use development tool with great rewards for a small amount of effort. However, some users caution that while Docker is a good solution, there may be better alternatives available.

  3. Another common recommendation is to carefully consider the use of Docker in a workflow and discuss its usability within the organization before implementing it. Users emphasize the importance of learning the basics of Docker and understanding if continuous integration/deployment is the right approach. They also mention that Docker has a supportive community and is widely used in the industry.

Overall, users suggest experimenting with Docker, especially for new applications or running micro-services. They recommend taking advantage of Docker's simplicity and portability while being mindful of specific requirements and considering other options if needed.

Attribute Ratings

Reviews

(1-1 of 1)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Vlad VARNA | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We are using Swarm for our analytics gathering service. Using swarm allows for quick workload scaling and using less hardware than was needed before.
  • Creating complex containers using docker files which automate a lot of DevOps manual labor
  • Having some preconfigured containers to do fast tests
  • The swarm takes away a lot of the work you would need to do for high availability
  • Kitematic UI is still very limited in functionality
  • Containers on Windows are somewhat hit and miss, Linux is strongly recommended
  • Swarm interface is mostly command line
  • Some network limitations (like remote client IP passthrough)
Great for light frontends and (REST) microservices that don't depend on hardware/drivers and just do DB/file IO. Not so great for dev virtual machines and testing complex network configurations.
  • With Swarm we managed to have the horizontal network bandwidth scale to gather data from clients on slow internet connections
  • A minor negative is that you always need at least 3 nodes for redundancy, which makes it less ideal for quick proof of concept type scenarios.
For light weight frontends, the Docker Swarm is the easiest to manage. One person can then mange the production environment and at the same time develop new software.
20
Product Management, R&D team
2
Developers
  • lightweight scalable services that require a lot of concurrent access
  • load balancing
  • high availability
  • devops
Yes
HAProxy and VMware/Cirtrix VMs. Manual administration was too cumbersome. Resource utilisation was not optimal.
  • Product Features
  • Product Usability
It was quick to learn, and automated a lot of the manual devops work needed before
If I had more time, I would have tried Kubernetes as well.
Kitematic is still in alpha.
The CLI is somewhat unintuitive at first.
  • Scale the number of replicas
  • Template a service
  • Install the service
  • tagging the containers takes some getting use to
  • some networking details are hard to configure (like remote client IP passthrough)
  • some service manipulation commands have bad defaults (like changing an image but not using the authentication needed to pullit by default)
No
Return to navigation