Skip to main content
TrustRadius
Neo4j

Neo4j

Overview

What is Neo4j?

Neo4j is an open source embeddable graph database developed by Neo Technologies based in San Mateo, California with an office in Sweden.

Read more
Recent Reviews

TrustRadius Insights

Neo4j has proven to be a valuable tool for a wide range of applications and industries. Users appreciate its efficiency in storing and …
Continue reading
Read all reviews
Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing

Aura Professional

$65

Cloud
per month

Community Edition

Free

On Premise

Enterprise Edition

Contact Sales

On Premise

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee
For the latest information on pricing, visithttps://neo4j.com/pricing

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting/Integration Services

Starting price (does not include set up fee)

  • $65 per month
Return to navigation

Product Details

Neo4j Technical Details

Deployment TypesOn-premise, Software as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based
Operating SystemsWindows, Linux, Mac
Mobile ApplicationNo

Frequently Asked Questions

Neo4j is an open source embeddable graph database developed by Neo Technologies based in San Mateo, California with an office in Sweden.

Neo4j starts at $65.

The most common users of Neo4j are from Enterprises (1,001+ employees).
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(34)

Community Insights

TrustRadius Insights are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, 3rd-party data sources. Have feedback on this content? Let us know!

Neo4j has proven to be a valuable tool for a wide range of applications and industries. Users appreciate its efficiency in storing and retrieving data with tree relationships, making it an ideal choice as the primary database for applications. In comparison to traditional SQL databases, Neo4j outperforms in efficiently looking up nodes and their relationships. This is particularly beneficial for applications that deal with data containing multiple relationships.

One area where Neo4j excels is in persisting knowledge graphs, providing a schemaless data store that enables the discovery of relationships between entities. Its ability to improve query performance through constant-time joins and fast search and retrieval of results makes it suitable for websites that require efficient data management. Additionally, Neo4j serves as a central storage solution for managing relationships within complex datasets, offering easy data management, analysis, and reporting capabilities.

In the commercial sector, Neo4j is highly utilized to create network maps and visualize relationships between customers or end-users. This not only aids in understanding the connections between individuals but also facilitates strategic planning and decision-making. Furthermore, Neo4j's capacity to handle large databases with multiple relationships without sacrificing performance makes it an excellent choice for both research and development purposes as well as at the application level for supporting queries on extensive datasets. Overall, Neo4j's versatility and efficiency make it a powerful tool for various use cases across industries.

Fast and Efficient Performance: Many users have praised Neo4j for its extremely fast performance, allowing for quick processing of queries and efficient handling of large datasets. The software's ability to handle complex tasks without any performance issues has been highlighted by multiple reviewers.

Intuitive Query Language: Reviewers have appreciated the intuitive and easy-to-use query language, Cypher, which makes it simple to write and execute queries in Neo4j. This mature query language offers rich features and is capable of effectively handling a wide range of problems, making it a preferred choice for many users.

Flexible Integration Options: Neo4j's support for APIs in various programming languages such as Java, Python, PHP, and NodeJS has been highly valued by users. This flexibility allows for seamless integration with different systems and provides ease of use when working with external applications or services.

Scaling Challenges: Some users have found it challenging to horizontally scale Neo4j and have not been able to find a viable solution for this issue.

Limited Integration with Other APIs: Several users have mentioned that Neo4j does not integrate well with other open source APIs like Blueprint, requiring the use of its own native API instead.

Lack of Built-in Visual Tool: Many users expressed a desire for a built-in visual tool within Neo4j to view data, rather than relying on third-party tools.

Attribute Ratings

Reviews

(1-5 of 5)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
[Neo4j] is being used on the commercial side of our organization to help create network maps and see relationships between customers or end-users. I am not sure if other areas of the business are using it at the moment. I would say it is still in its infancy at our company, though.
  • Show relationships between different data points
  • Visualize network maps
  • Show stronger influencers
  • Be quicker at processing data
  • Have less lagging when interacting with the network map
  • Be able share with other users on a server
Neo4J is great for creating network graphs or illustrating how things are related. It is also good for finding individuals or things that have greater influence than others in a system. It is not appropriate if you have standard data sets that can be analyzed using conventional methods or visualized using Tableau, for example.
  • Ability to illustrate networks
  • Page rank algorithm to explore influence
  • Explore relationships
  • Show insights where conventional methods failed to do so
  • Point out main customers or touch points that require more attention
  • Work towards a more networked frame of mind
I have not used anything like Neo4J because of how unique it is in the work that it allows me to do. I am not aware of any other graph database platforms and it might be because it is a growing area (especially in the world of pharmaceuticals). I would be open to trying other softwares though.
Score 6 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
As [we are] working in the US healthcare domain, we have to deal with large databases like UMLS. It also contains more than 12 relationships among the nodes. To analyze and build a relational module, Neo4j is good choice for us. Mostly Neo4j is used in the R&D department for analysis. But it is also in use at application level to support queries on a large dataset.
  • It's very efficient on large datasets to support the multiple relations between the nodes.
  • Inserting or updating any node or relation is also very easy through the UI or a script
  • Provides very good graphical representation to analyse or present a dataset
  • Very good interactive UI for analysis of any dataset
  • Though the performance is good on a small dataset it requires a well configured server for a large dataset
  • Also graphical representation for less complex dataset is good but for complex dataset in which more than 10 relation possible graphs are not good
  • Also the interactive UI for a complex dataset is little bit complex
Neo4j is well suited for POC and analysis purposes on some subsets of large data sets; also very efficient query language to query the knowledge. But if you have to deal with a large and complex data set, it's not a good option.
  • It adds the ability to quickly load any data set with less time
  • Also we are able to do a POC on different graphs very easily through a good query language; Good for less heavy applications
  • For easy query language and better graphical representation on small dataset
  • Also easy to set up and handle on the server.
  • On top of that Neo4j also provides an API support to interact through any system.
[Based on] Query Language, Performance on small and large data sets, integration and deployment, analysis, API support, Interactive UI.
Nitin Pasumarthy | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
I am using it as schemaless data store to persist my knowledge graph. As the name indicates, neo4j is a perfect choice when the query pattern is about finding the relationships between entities. I evaluated it with similar use cases, besides knowledge graph, where finding patterns was essential. It is a very good choice when joins are very common in a relational store. As the data is completely materialized, all joins are in constant time which tremendously improves query performance out of the box without extra system design.
  • When joins are a common in a relational store, switching to Neo4j is better
  • When pattern matching and surfacing interesting insights is the goal, neo4j's cypher is pretty powerful
  • When schema is not completely known beforehand and needs to be evolved with time
  • Better support for aggregation queries
  • Drivers for Spark where ML or more computationally heavy jobs are to be performed
  • Native support for complex properties for nodes and relationships
  • When pattern matching in data is crucial
  • When data exploration is common query pattern
  • When a graph algorithm solves the problem better at scale
  • When evolving schema is important
  • When constant time joins in a relational database are common
  • When schemaless transaction support is required
  • When thinking in patterns is a more common way to derive insights from the data
  • It has a very positive impact due to excellent community support
  • Helps us iterate our ideas much faster
  • Easy to use as it a very natural way to think of data - nodes and relationships
  • Use years of existing graph algorithms on large scale
Neo4j is a graph store and has different use cases compared to another NoSQL Document store like MongoDB. MongoDB is a bad choice when joins are common as existing operators for joining two documents (similar to tables in a relational store) as Mongo 3.5 use SQL like join algorithms which are expensive. MongoDB is a great choice when distributed schemaless rich document structures are important requirements. Cross document transaction support is not native to MongoDB yet, whereas Neo4J is ACID complaint with all its operations.
MongoDB, Redis, React
Rahul Chaudhary | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Neo4j was an experiment for us. We needed to model people and relationships for which graph databases were most suited. Google search resulted "Neo4j" on top, so we tried it, and it is awesome! The project, unfortunately, has been shut down, but at the time, we used it as the primary database for the application. The database model was designed such that every piece of information could be mapped to either a node or an edge, so we didn't need to use any sort of relational or other no-SQL database.
  • Neo4j is extremely fast.
  • Neo4j has its own query language CYPHER which is very intuitive and easy to use.
  • Neo4j supports API in almost every language like Java, Python, PHP, NodeJS, etc.
  • One of the hardest challenges that Neo4j had to solve was the horizontal scaling problem. I am not updated on recent developments, but at the time of my use, I couldn't find a viable solution.
  • Neo4j does not play with other open source APIs like Blueprint. You have to use the native Neo4j API.
  • There wasn't a visual tool to see your data. Of course, third party tools are always available, but I would have loved something which came with the Neo4j bundle. I love that Docker comes bundled with Kitematic, so it's not wrong to hope that Neo4j could also ship with some default visualization software.
If you have a graph problem, or if you can model your data in nodes and edges, my friend, you need a graph database. And Neo4j is the leading one. So that is reason good enough to use it.

But if you try and use it without a use case, you are in for a rough ride. It is hard to switch from a relational or JSON like data structure to a graph one. You wouldn't have access to all the joins and tables (at least not in the traditional sense).
  • For experimentation purposes, it had a positive impact on my company. It was very natural to work with Neo4j and so intuitive to visualize the data.
  • Neo4j community edition is free, which is what we experimented on. So there was no investment up front apart from employee's time. But this quickly gave results and it was time well spent.
  • Neo4j is a cool but very new technology. It was hard to have people onboard, especially some of the leadership and relational folks.
  • Titan-Distributed Graph Database
Neo4j is ahead of any of the leading competitors I know. The only one which comes close, in my opinion, is the "Titan-Distributed Graph Database" which is completely open source and free to use. Titan works on top of Apache Cassandra so it has some huge learning curves to do, whereas Neo4j is just downloaded and used. Because of this reason, I can easily see why someone would prefer Neo4j over Titan or any other graph database.
Aaron Gussman | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We use Neo4j as storage for data that can naturally be modeled as a graph (think nodes and edges). It allows us to create rich objects with multiple properties, ingest them at reasonable rates, and the search against the graph and return results fast enough that you can run a website directly off it.

It's not a general data storage solution, but for applications where you can about the graph or network nature of the data it excels.
  • It's very easy to install.
  • The built in web interface is incredibly useful. It enables you to quickly test out queries and visualize the results.
  • Third-party libraries/APIs are well represented. CYPHER isn't actually that hard to write directly, either.
  • It would be nice to have some concept of namespaces, or some way of roughly making a single instance multi-tenant. It'd be nice to make sandboxing easier.
  • Automatic backups could be improved.
Neo4j should only used when your data can be modeled as a graph (e.g. nodes and edges) AND you actually care about its network qualities. It's not a general purpose data store. If you have large amounts of text to store, you'll need to augment Neo4j with something else like Elasticsearch. Also Neo4j can be a little wonky with date time data (e.g., attempts at representing date time objects explicitly on the graph, as opposed to properties, is going to be a challenge).
  • It enables backend functionality that would essentially be impossible without it. It's also pretty easy to get up and running and demos very well.
We've done some BOE comparisons between Neo4j, Titan, and OrientDB. The general consensus was that Titan is too unweildy and that Neo4j beat out OrientDB by being more active and having a large community.
Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2), Elasticsearch, DataSift, Mesosphere
Return to navigation