TrustRadius Insights
Plastic SCM has found a variety of use cases among individual developers and small project teams who are looking for efficient code …
Starting at $6.95 per user
View PricingOverview
What is Plastic SCM?
Plastic SCM is a full stack version control system that aims to make software configuration easy. It focuses on enabling dev teams get work done by facilitating branching, diffing and merging. The vendor says that for those purposes it provides…
Recent Reviews
Pricing
Cloud Edition
$6.95
Cloud
per user
Team Edition (on prem)
$9.95
On Premise
per user
Enterprise Edition
$23.25
On Premise
per user
Entry-level set up fee?
- Setup fee optional
For the latest information on pricing, visithttps://www.plasticscm.com/pricing
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Product Details
- About
- Integrations
- Competitors
- Tech Details
- Downloadables
What is Plastic SCM?
Plastic SCM is a full stack version control system that aims to make software configuration easy. It focuses on enabling dev teams get work done by facilitating branching, diffing and merging. The vendor says that for those purposes it provides cross-platform apps and GUIs with:
It can handle big files (over 2 GB), it has lock features to avoid concurrent work on files. It also caters for artists and designers – or anyone working in a centralized why for that matter – by providing them a separate, fully featured app called Gluon: a point and click GUI that abstracts them for the complexity of version control while allowing them to work with devs easily. The vendor says they provide on prem (Team Edition) and Cloud (Cloud Edition) installations and everything in between, with hassle-free implementation and prices in range of 60% less than their main competitors.
- Branch explorer
- Diffing and merging tools (both syntactic and semantic)
- On-premises and cloud repo management
- Code review
- mergebots (last mile DevOps merging automation)
- across industries
- in enterprise companies with world wide distributed teams
- in companies with vendors and contractors embedded in their workflows and tight security requirements and complex deployment setup
- among video game studios, big and small, that use Unity, Unreal, Ogre or any of the available popular engines
It can handle big files (over 2 GB), it has lock features to avoid concurrent work on files. It also caters for artists and designers – or anyone working in a centralized why for that matter – by providing them a separate, fully featured app called Gluon: a point and click GUI that abstracts them for the complexity of version control while allowing them to work with devs easily. The vendor says they provide on prem (Team Edition) and Cloud (Cloud Edition) installations and everything in between, with hassle-free implementation and prices in range of 60% less than their main competitors.
Plastic SCM Features
- Supported: branching, diffing and merging tool
- Supported: Branch explorer
- Supported: mergebots (last mile DevOps merging automation)
- Supported: Gluon: GUI for artists and designers that work centralized, with lock features and support for large files
- Supported: Repo management
- Supported: Code review
- Supported: Changeset explorer
Plastic SCM Screenshots
Plastic SCM Video
Plastic SCM is a version control to help teams focus on delivering work, one task at a time.
Plastic SCM Competitors
Plastic SCM Technical Details
| Deployment Types | On-premise, Software as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based |
|---|---|
| Operating Systems | Windows, Linux, Mac |
| Mobile Application | No |
| Supported Languages | English |
Plastic SCM Customer Size Distribution
| Consumers | 25% |
|---|---|
| Small Businesses (1-50 employees) | 20% |
| Mid-Size Companies (51-500 employees) | 15% |
| Enterprises (more than 500 employees) | 40% |
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(8)
Community Insights
TrustRadius Insights are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, 3rd-party data sources. Have feedback on this content? Let us know!
- Business Problems Solved
- Pros
- Cons
- Recommendations
Plastic SCM has found a variety of use cases among individual developers and small project teams who are looking for efficient code management and version control. Users appreciate the ease of use and the availability of a free pricing tier, making it accessible to a wide range of users. The graphical user interface, or GUI, of Plastic SCM has been particularly helpful for non-coding individuals, allowing them to understand the continuous integration/continuous deployment process more easily. It simplifies organizing CI/CD pipelines and provides convenient access to repositories, making it an excellent alternative to GitHub.
One of the key benefits of Plastic SCM is its ability to handle scaling and versioning code effectively. It assists with continuous deployment and monitoring, effectively resolving issues related to repositories like Git. Users find merging and creating pull requests straightforward, thanks to the intuitive features provided by Plastic SCM. Its semantic functionalities, such as refactor detection, have proven helpful in resolving complex diffing refactors. In game development, Plastic SCM offers robust version control for managing Unity-made projects with large file sizes.
While Plastic SCM has received positive feedback for its affordability and branching system, some users have encountered issues with search times or occasional crashes. Additionally, certain users have found the nomenclature and interface of Plastic SCM confusing and not as user-friendly as they would prefer. Basic actions like shelving and merging can require repetitive steps and sometimes result in error messages. However, overall, Plastic SCM remains a popular choice for source control, cloud storage, collaboration in SaaS projects, and centralized code repository management in businesses across various industries due to its scalability, performance on the WAN, access control features, and support for version control, branching, and merging in simultaneous developments.
Easy to use and user-friendly: Users find Plastic SCM easy to use and appreciate its intuitive user interface, allowing for quick task completion. Many reviewers have stated that they found it simple to navigate and work with the software.
GUI provides visual environment: The inclusion of a GUI in Plastic SCM is highly appreciated by users as it provides a visual environment that helps them navigate and work with the software more easily. Several reviewers have mentioned that the GUI enhances their overall experience with the tool.
Low learning curve: Plastic SCM is praised for its low learning curve, allowing users to get started quickly and without much difficulty. Many users have mentioned that they were able to adapt to the software easily, which has helped them save time and be productive from the start.
User-Friendly and Learning Resources: Many users have expressed that Plastic SCM is not user-friendly and lacks a good source of learning, making it difficult for them to get started with the software. Some reviewers have mentioned that the initial setup process can be tedious and complicated, especially for those switching from simpler version control systems.
UE4 Plugin Performance: The UE4 plugin for Plastic SCM is criticized for being slow and unreliable. Users report long waiting times for basic file operations and syncing projects, as well as frequent crashes of the UE editor. This has caused frustration among users who rely on this plugin for their Unreal Engine 4 development workflow.
Lack of Branching Options: Several users have mentioned that Plastic SCM has limited branching capabilities compared to Git. They feel that the lack of frequent branching and merging capabilities in Plastic SCM makes it less flexible and efficient for managing complex codebases.
Perforce has received several recommendations as a good alternative to more robust version control systems like git, especially for projects that are not using Unreal/Unity. Here are the three most common recommendations from users:
-
Users have praised Perforce for its reliability and efficiency in managing non-Unreal/Unity projects. They appreciate its stability and find it efficient in handling large files and multiple branches and streams.
-
Many reviewers have highlighted Perforce's user-friendly interface, which makes it easy to navigate and collaborate. They find it intuitive to check-in and check-out files, track changes, and resolve conflicts.
-
Users express satisfaction with Perforce's excellent support and integration options. They appreciate the helpful documentation, responsive customer service, and frequent updates. They also find the integration options valuable for seamless integration with other tools commonly used in software development workflows.
Overall, users recommend Perforce as a suitable choice for projects that don't require advanced features offered by other version control systems like git, particularly in scenarios where Unreal or Unity engines are not being used.
Reviews
(1-1 of 1)Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
February 21, 2022
Great tool for Game Development - already integrated in Unity
- Version Control
- Organizing Workflow
- Transparency
- Interface
- Documentation
- Learning curve
- Unity integration
- Gluon
- Cloud Server
- Branching
- Security
- Unity single click usage
- Easy to use
- Cheap
- Better than git for us
- Artists love it
Plastic has best integration with unity - zero issues, native, straightforward. GitHub feels more stable but for smaller and or indie teams plastic s version control feels much more under control - you click, you feel safe. moreover, there is no need for extra tools such as gitkraken, gitlab, Sourcetree, fork, etc. it is really easy to develop games this way.