QMetry Test Management

User-Friendly Interface: Reviewers have consistently praised QMetry for its user-friendly interface and easy-to-understand design. Many users have found it intuitive to navigate, making tasks easy to accomplish.

Efficient Integration with JIRA and Other Tools: The seamless integration of QMetry with JIRA, Jenkins, and GitHub has been highly appreciated by reviewers. They have highlighted the efficiency of this integration in defect management, CI/CD processes, and collaboration between different teams.

Ability to Create Customized Reports: Users have expressed their satisfaction with QMetry's ability to generate customized reports. This feature allows them to tailor reports according to their specific requirements, providing valuable insights into test execution and progress.

Cons: Limited user roles and permissions: Some users have mentioned that they are unable to delete the Test suite when they have the role of the only user. They also expressed difficulties in adding projects to a user and suggested a more efficient method. Challenges with test case management and execution: Users have reported issues where test cases do not load with steps on the new Jira's view, requiring them to manually link a test case to a bug when adding it from a test run. Additionally, repeating the setup of a test cycle has been found inconvenient and moving test cases from one project to another was difficult. Difficulties with automation testing: Several users find it hard to understand and use the automation testing feature, suggesting an upgrade for better usability. Some users even mentioned spending months on training to effectively use QMetry while facing challenges in deleting certain elements and perfecting the UI for test plans.

Users commonly recommend the following three recommendations when using QMetry as a test management tool:

1. Have a good tech admin for setup and education. Users suggest that having a knowledgeable technical administrator is important for setting up and effectively utilizing QMetry. This recommendation highlights the need for expertise in configuring and managing the tool.

2. Establish good patterns in the organization for durable and valuable workflow. Users recommend implementing well-defined processes and practices within the organization to ensure a consistent and effective workflow. This suggestion emphasizes the importance of establishing reliable patterns to enhance productivity and maximize the value of using QMetry.

3. Consider whether a heavy-duty test management solution or a simple low-cost solution is needed. Users advise evaluating the specific requirements of the organization before choosing QMetry as a test management tool. This recommendation encourages considering whether a more comprehensive and robust solution or a simpler, cost-effective option would better align with the organization's needs.

It is worth noting that while users generally find QMetry to be a great and simple tool for effectively managing requirements, defects, and test cases, some users mention that the value for money could be improved. Additionally, users highlight the importance of proper setup for improving application response time. Some users also suggest exploring other software options based on personal preference or previous experiences with different test management tools.