Qualio

Staged task module: Users appreciate the software's staged task module, which allows for the review and approval of individual stages of an activity. This feature has been mentioned by several reviewers as particularly useful for handling complaints and CAPAs.

Comprehensive training module: The training module in the software provides a comprehensive view of training completion by groups, individuals, and procedures. Many users have praised this feature for offering trending information and tracking overdue assignments.

Efficient document search engine: The software's search engine allows users to easily locate specific documents or groups of documents based on various criteria such as title, reference, template type, or attached tags. Several reviewers have mentioned how this flexibility and efficiency in document searching has been beneficial to their workflow.

Challenging Document Editor: Some users have found the editor for creating documents to be challenging and different from MS Word, leading to difficulties in formatting and navigating through the document. These challenges can slow down productivity and require additional time to learn how to effectively use the editor.

Inefficient Search Functionality: Several users have expressed frustration with the search function within the software. They have reported that it is not efficient and needs improvement. Users find it difficult to locate specific information or documents quickly, which can result in wasted time and decreased efficiency when using the system.

Lack of Mobile App: Many users have indicated their disappointment over the absence of a mobile app for accessing and working on documents while on-the-go. Without a mobile app, users are unable to conveniently access important documents or make updates when they are away from their computers. This limitation restricts flexibility and convenience for users who frequently work outside of traditional office settings.

Users commonly recommend considering all major players before making a decision and ensuring that the software is a good fit for their quality management system (QMS) needs. They suggest looking into all the features and having a complete demo to evaluate the software's capabilities.

Another recommendation is to use the self-hosted version of the software instead of the cloud version. Users also emphasize the importance of planning enough time for transitioning to the software. Additionally, they suggest using the sandbox to test out the software before making a purchase.

Users think that the software is easy to use and has a user-friendly interface. They also believe that it is competitively priced and offers a good value for streamlining certification processes. However, some users mention that while the software is suitable for documentation review and approvals, it may not be ideal for detailed deviations, investigations, and change control.

In summary, users recommend considering all major players, evaluating the software's features through demos, and planning ahead for transitioning to the software. They also highlight the ease of use and competitive pricing as favorable aspects of the software, while emphasizing its suitability for documentation review and approvals.