Quip Review
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
Pros
- I think it's really great for collaboration. In the past using things like Microsoft Word in a SharePoint or something or in some sort of shared file folder, people would typically overwrite other people's stuff or it would mess up a document because people would edit it while somebody else was editing it then save it. What Quip does really is allow multiple people (we've had somewhere up as 20 plus people contributing to a doc) all at the same time and there was very little override or problems collaborating on the docs. It's really great for collaboration.
- I think it does a really great job of file structure so you can save it in folders, you can basically use it as a knowledge repository if you wanted to. So I think it does a really great job of that.
Cons
- I think the search could be a little bit better. Sometimes when you're searching for a file, especially if your company uses it extensively, you have lots of files that are the same name, there's an option to search for by author and it doesn't always work and so it takes some time to search for things. Maybe if it had an AI powered search or a little bit better elastic search, then I think it would really enhance the product.
Return on Investment
- I think it's mainly been positive. It's allowed us to really be able to get multiple people offering a doc very easily. It's very easy to spin up a new one. It's very easy to share it. It's really easy to restrict access if you need to restrict access. So I think it's allowed us to move rather fast, especially at Amazon our doc writing is extremely important and you need a lot of people to contribute to those documents, so it's really allowed us to collaborate well together and get projects done faster or tackle things a lot faster.







