Skip to main content
TrustRadius
BitBar

BitBar
Formerly CrossBrowserTesting

Overview

What is BitBar?

BitBar allows users to test applications across the latest and most popular real browsers and devices.Users can scale testing by increasing test coverage and decreasing test execution time by running automated tests in parallel across browsers and devices. BitBar integrates…

Read more
Recent Reviews

TrustRadius Insights

Clean and User-Friendly Interface: Users have found the user interface of the product to be clean and user-friendly, making it easy for …
Continue reading
Read all reviews

Awards

Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards

Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee
For the latest information on pricing, visithttps://smartbear.com/products/bitbar/p…

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting/Integration Services

Starting price (does not include set up fee)

  • $39 per month
Return to navigation

Product Demos

Mikey nunchuck demo at Bitbar

YouTube
Return to navigation

Product Details

What is BitBar?

BitBar allows users to test applications across the latest and most popular real browsers and devices.

Users can scale testing by increasing test coverage and decreasing test execution time by running automated tests in parallel across browsers and devices. BitBar integrates with the user's current tech stack or CI/CD pipeline.

Key Features:
* BitBar offers one cloud for all testing platforms whether it be web, native, or hybrid applications.
* Test an application across real environments without the need of maintaining a device lab.
* Deploy testing from a preferred cloud environment.
* Teams can scale the automation speed with Selenium and Appium cloud testing.

BitBar Features

  • Supported: Live Testing
  • Supported: Automated Screenshots
  • Supported: Selenium Testing
  • Supported: Visual Comparisons
  • Supported: Script Testing
  • Supported: Appium Testing

BitBar Technical Details

Deployment TypesSoftware as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based
Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo

Frequently Asked Questions

BitBar starts at $39.

BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, and Kobiton are common alternatives for BitBar.

The most common users of BitBar are from Mid-sized Companies (51-1,000 employees).
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(24)

Community Insights

TrustRadius Insights are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, 3rd-party data sources. Have feedback on this content? Let us know!

Clean and User-Friendly Interface: Users have found the user interface of the product to be clean and user-friendly, making it easy for them to navigate and efficiently use. This has been stated by several reviewers, highlighting the positive experience they had with the intuitive design.

Convenient Testing on Development Server: The ability to test on their development server, even if it is behind a firewall, has been highly appreciated by users. This feature provides convenience and ease of use, allowing them to perform testing without any restrictions or additional setup.

Time-Saving Test Automation: Many users have expressed their appreciation for the product's automation capabilities. Being able to automate tests using the product saves time and effort for reviewers, enabling them to streamline their testing process effectively.

Slow performance on mobile devices: Many users have reported that the software is significantly slow when loading on various mobile devices, indicating a notable performance issue. This sluggishness can negatively impact user experience and productivity.

Outdated mobile device list: A common concern raised by reviewers is that the mobile device list is not updated frequently enough, suggesting that the software lacks real-time updates. As a result, it may not accurately reflect the latest models and configurations available in the market, potentially affecting testing accuracy.

Questionable accuracy of results: Users have noticed discrepancies between the results generated by the software and their actual phones, raising doubts about the accuracy of the software's outputs. This lack of alignment may lead to errors or misinterpretations when analyzing test outcomes.

Reviews

(1-6 of 6)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
CrossBrowserTesting is a great tool to use when you have a new page or new content that you want to test on an array of devices/browsers. In the diverse online world nowadays, it is nearly impossible to ensure optimization for every case. CBT allows you to get closer to that goal.
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Well Suited:
1. Real devices (virtually) at single places
2. Coverage
3. Ease of use
4. Live Testing
5. Quickly checking/verification of issue on multiple places in less time

Less Appropriate:
1. Slower while using
2. Screen layout - Landscape , Portrait switch
3. Cloud connectivity can be improved



Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
It's excellent for manual testing, developer validation, and QA servers. We also find it's helpful for reproducing bugs in production, particularly when it's done by a user who has a different operating system. We also use it to quickly spin up interactive desktops to handle potentially harmful customer service requests that might attempt to install malware.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
A client came saying they are having layout errors on the site but we are not seeing the same thing. After a bit of research, we found that the client was using an older version of a browser. We were able to test on that exact browser the client was having the problem on and see the same problem. Which helped us find a solution to the layout error on the older browser.
Return to navigation