TrustRadius
SoapUI NG Pro is an open source functional and load testing tool, supported by Boston-based developer Smartbear Software.https://media.trustradius.com/product-logos/4P/vN/G2N594DETCUS.PNGFast debugging/testing for a better productI use SoapUI whenever I need to test various endpoints be REST or SOAP. I usually set up various projects for different environments and within each project I setup multiple endpoints we want to test. I like the easiness of using the application to quickly debug any issues in any of our environments. I can get to the issue quickly and test it in multiple environments at the same time. I like the way I can jump from endpoint to endpoint with just switching windows back and forth and compare results in the same window and not worry about copying text to another text editor. I can do my workflow in the same application.,Organization of different endpoints and environments. Easiness of use. Quickly debug issues with endpoints.,Some times the UI freezes and I lose all my data. Dated UI. Autosave option.,9,Quick testing Finds issues faster Better quality of the product in production,,IntelliJ IDEA, Dynatrace Application Monitoring, SlackAdvantages of SoapUI over other and how it help. Me and my organization for better developmentIt is being used from time to time for testing our web services. I help developers to find and rectify issues, if any, before implementing it on the development system. It clears doubts about the functionality and output of the web service call.,Can be easily used by technical and non-technical staff in multiple environments that are familiar to them. Its data-driven testing capabilities and real-world condition testing save a lot more time that can be put to some other usage. It simplifies regression testing and clearly shows the test approach used and testing areas covered. Test results and functionality can be tracked easily using test history and result comparison. Its report building template is very cool and understandable they provide and highlights each and every required information in a better way.,It is quite heavy for old systems - The lite version could be beneficial for such old machines.,9,Increased efficiency of time and resources. Improved the output of every development, testing and integration phase. Helps in building accurate services by providing through testing facilities. Reduces error in the final stages of the life cycle.,Postman,PostmanBest software used for web services, security testing, and load testing.Testing has been made really easy and quality has been improved manifold. The code coverage has also been increased thus improving overall customer satisfaction.,The SoapUI tool is the best out there when you need to test a web service with ease. Great collaboration features, especially the scripts repository available in the paid version.,Documentation should be better, despite being a simple tool to use. Sometimes the huge amount of configuration parameters could be overwhelming, luckily there is tons of information on the web and forums to solve any question or problem.,9,Saved the company a lot of money and time in testing web services. SoapUI makes API testing easy.,TestComplete,GFI Systems, McAfee Endpoint Security, Check Point SSL VPNSOAP UI tool is simply the best for any organizationWe use SOAPUI to test our web API calls and we did create a couple of projects inside of this tool to address different legacy projects. This tool is nice and handy when you need to test the bunch of different calls like GET and PUT, and POST. It also saves our work and can be easily picked up next time we need to test that API call. It also allows you to save user credentials to test the API call. We also tried Fiddler and Postman before coming to this. Somehow, this felt easy to maintain when testing the web API calls. I would recommend this product to my network friends.,Can be used to test all WEB API calls All rest calls with an association with DataPower or Stone Bond can be tested efficiently. Can store your work so that it can be picked up next time.,Would be nice if it stored the results of each call. UI can be redesigned to give user-friendly exp compared to Postman.,7,It will save development time of each resource. I don't know any negatives.,PostmanSOAP UI Hasn't Cleaned My Troubleshooting Needs YetWe use it primarily for REST troubleshooting and authentication testing. It's the only application of its kind available on our locked-down development environment currently. We also use it for SOAP troubleshooting, as a lot of our medical data transfers use this standard.,Managing different testing environments through projects. Makes a clear distinction between REST and SOAP troubleshooting. There are a lot of options available that support various data standards, some that are more obscure but help the person that needs it.,When you need to just do a quick REST test, it takes too long to get everything setup from a new project. Adding authentications can be a pain, and if it's basic auth then you have to base64 encode it yourself. The UI used to be pretty ugly. Their update to it recently seemed to just put a flat look on everything to make it seem modern but didn't actually overhaul much. Buttons still jump around and move/shift when other dynamic areas change during a test that goes through a bunch of calls. Also, they still use child windows to control all the views, which isn't very nice to work with considering no other development application I use does that.,5,It's helped troubleshoot REST and SOAP issues, but not speedily. I've often had to turn to other tools instead. It has made projects take longer.,Burp Suite,Burp SuiteBest and powerful framework for API testingSoapUI is an powerful tool for API testing and solid framework.As it is an open source tool, it is totally free for everyone who use web service testing. We send services ad send data through webservices . We can declare the variables and change the values parameters without having code in our test cases. We just load the WSDL address and it shows us all the methods and then we submit the variables and send it and get the result. its interfere is easy to learn,Easy to use Test out web services Better hands on groovy,It shows an error if the request has special characters. Writing upload test cases is a bit difficult Virtual services are not supported,8,Saves time in web service testing Make it easy No need to code muchGreat tool for testing web servicesWe use SoapUI in our organisation to simulate web services. There is a WSDL location which we copy and paste onto the SoapUI. After that we run XMLs through which data directly flows into our systems.,Acts as a great external source to get data onto the main system. Runs all kinds of XMLs irrespective of their size. Great tool for API testing.,Saving projects can be a little confusing for beginners. Sometimes it functions a bit slow for complex XMLs. UI is a bit outdated now and needs to get a new refreshing look.,9,The UI does not support 4K resolution. You need to reduce screen size. The validation errors are sometimes not very easy to grab. Interface can be improved.,Trello, FreshBooks, FuzeA happy and proud userOur whole organization is using SoapUI NG Pro. Specifically, it's being widely used across all QA departments for Webservice testing. All the REST and SOAP API testing projects are being tested using SoapUI NG Pro. We are testing REST and SOAP APIs manually as well as automate them using SoapUI NG Pro.,Test validation on API responses Mock services to test parts of the application REST Discovery and Groovy scripting features,Working with Git needs to be improved. The licenses could be more flexible with regards to floating licenses. In the case that a user changes a workstation, then the license locked to a certain workstation cannot be easily changed to another workstation. It would be more flexible if a license could be linked with the user personally.,8,Positive impact: It has made our webservice automation faster and more reliable than manual webservice testing. ROI has definitely increased in recent months. Negative Impact: You need trained resources in order to implement the complete solution. Sometimes it's difficult to find trained sources.,JMeter,JMeter, JIRA Software, Atlassian ConfluenceAPI testing using SOAPUIWe have used SoapUI for an automation testing of API's. Used test runner to run scheduler jobs which will automatically do the health checks of API's and update the status in the database. Later, that data is used to build dashboards which shows which API's are up and which are down along with the error details. It is used as part of monitoring test environments by environment teams. Test results and dashboards really help the environment team to find out the problematic component and help to create a mitigation plan.,Create test cases and test suites for testing API's Test both SOAP and REST web services. Test runners for running automated jobs.,It can be made more user-friendly, beginner users struggle to use the interface. For example, learning how to add request headers for different types. Hermes JMS is slow for testing MQ services and struggled to use SOAPUI over other message queue tools.,9,By using SOAP UI test runner we removed the manual intervention for testing of API's.,JMeter,Tableau Desktop, JIRA SoftwareSoapUI - playing with web servicesSoapUI is implemented by the systems team. We use it for the realization of SOAP or REST requests of the different web services that we manage for our clients.,Rapid import of web services. Just by placing the url where the service is located, the application is responsible for directly detecting the .asmx and creates the necessary structure to work on it. The interface is quite simple to work with, which makes it one of the most convenient applications to manage SOAP or REST projects. Besides, it also generates a self-saving of projects or requests that have not been previously saved. Accepts multiple types of media to send in POST requests, including the most used JSON and XML.,What should be improved is the way in which the multiple queries that are made are displayed. It should allow you to see it in the form of tabs and not cover all the contents of the window.,8,The biggest impact has been the acceptance of the users, since there is a lot of information in the network regarding this tool, from support to online forums where they can clarify any questions you may have.,JMeter,Microsoft 365 Business, Microsoft Office 2016, IntelliJ IDEA, FortiClientSoap UI for Technical Product Managers and Business AnalystsI am a technical product manager. While we are dealing with opening new services via our product, it becomes very vital to test the input and output of services to look for all possible values. It is used by all system/business analysts and product managers across the whole organization. It seems there is no better alternative because it is a compact tool and makes analysts' and product managers' lives easier while dealing with the whole functionality of our products.,Easy to see all possible methods of a web service, easy to create many different possible requests. The formatted view makes it easy to see the whole request and response. It's easy to share via colleagues including all possible trials.,Some features could be added via add ons like an HTTP monitor, test runner, some artifacts. With them, it becomes a big installation (modularity). Sometimes it takes some time to open the interface; it is important to have a faster interface in today's applications. It could include input and output beautifiers - this would make users happy because they may use this feature heavily while they are making documentation.,9,,JIRA Software, Atlassian Confluence, Micro Focus PPM (formerly HP PPM)Decreasing relevance in a RESTful world, but invaluable to SOAP usersSoapUI is used primarily by developers looking to connect to and develop against our suite of enterprise services. It makes testing and discovery easy for them. Additionally, our services developers use SoapUI to test and support the services they write. Without having to write any code, the structure of services can be quickly examined, and specific use cases tested. When the code is not behaving as expected, running a quick request in SoapUI is often the fastest way to narrow down the source of the problem.,Quickly and easily discover and connect to service endpoints Create and save test requests for easy re-use Immediate "is the service up and responding" checks.,The UI is written in Java, and as such sometimes behaves in unexpected ways - ways that a native Windows UI would not. Startup time can often be painfully slow. Once the program is running, it performs well, but starting up can sometimes take nearly a full minute. I believe this is also due to having been written in Java. I used to consistently get errors about not having enough memory for the program to start up (in spite of having far more memory than it will ever need in my machine). I solved the problem by manually tweaking the startup script to allocate more memory to the Java Runtime Engine. However, this solution seems to have exacerbated the slow startup time I mentioned above.,9,SoapUI has been an invaluable addition to our development and testing toolkit. If something like it did not exist, we would likely have tried to write something ourselves.,Visual Studio IDESOAUI NG Pro- Best in the industry.Until now, I have suggested three of our clients to use SOAP UI for their automated testing. I am an Integration developer and love automation (CI/CD). For leveraging the full advantages of DevOps lifecyle, we wanted to automate our assembly test cases for SOAP and REST APIs. After a bit of R&D across the market, I came to know the amazing features of SOAP UI Pro. We can write test cases, can use custom assertions with Groovy and can do a lot of cool stuff with SOAP UI. The best thing which pushes us to buy soap UI is its ability to execute TestSuite from outside of the SOAP UI IDE with Maven support. This is what we wanted to use in a DevOps environment, a testing framework which can be executed from outside with Maven. The another cool thing about SOAP UI is the reporting. It is very detailed and a person with minimal technical background can understand it easily.,Full Support for SOAP Services Testing. It will help you to create envelopes and headers to satisfy WS-Security, WS-Addressing etc. The wide range of assertion options. If you are still not satisfied, you can write your own assertion with the help of Groovy script and can use any Java library to do so. The Maven Support. You can simply export a TestSuite from SOAP UI and run it from outside on your CI/CD tool (i.e. Jenkins, Gitlab etc) with the help of Maven.,The User Interface of SOAPUI is very oldish. Sometimes it acts weird, like if you change/remove any header in the request it will not go away until you restart SOAP UI. So the changes does not reflect immediately. I guess is something with UI only. Can add basic assertion like JSON match, XML Match , Json Schema Validation etc.,8,It completes and compliments our DevOps Strategy. For Developers, writing test cases is very easy. No need of testers to write test cases.,Postman,Mule ESB, Anypoint API Manager, Oracle SOA SuiteBest tool to exchange the XML form dataIt is used to create different types of web services and test those services. It helps to integrate test web services and verify that there is no bug in the newly developed web service. This tool is also used to get the XML response and store it into the system.,Provide support to fully test newly developed web services. Easy GUI interface which helps to add customers' credentials easily while using web service. An easy way to get a response through with the help of auto-created request XML.,It should add more GUI option which can show syntax error while adding new request XML. Adding credentials is a little bit confusing as it does not show any hit. It should allow sending the null value in request XML tags.,9,Help to increase the team productivity by debugging different web services code. Provides a better interface for business clients as they always want an easy interface with any web services. Easy to handle various requests at the same time.,WordPress, NetBeans and MailChimp,WordPress, MailChimp, Microsoft Visual Studio Team SystemGreat tool to fetch data from web servicesThis tool has been used by developers and integrators to develop/test the various kinds of web services. It is also used to create xml schemas and xsd files. This tool also helps to daily download micro power grid data and store in databases.,Helps to retrieve the data from any web service without developing any code. Easy to create complex xml schemas and xsd. Easy to find any error in xml request and response.,Difficult to add certificate file with request as it does not return any particular error if certificate is invalid. It should add auto-trigger request functionality. It takes time to request large sized data.,9,Helping to deliver high accuracy web services for business customers. Optimized the team's overall performance and reduce the resources cost. It provides various inbuilt tool to test the web services.,MySQL, Code Compare, EclipseMake load tests easy with SOAP UIWe use Soap UI to test RESTful and WSDL web services creating scenarios to validate them after new changes.,It enables creation of parametrized tests It supports RESTful web services It allows creation of test scenarios You can create load tests using it,Allowing versioning scripts to test Integration with IDEs as a plugin CI integration,9,It helped a lot because we used it to create our suite test with another framework which is hard to use Easy to understand, you don't need intensive training to understand how it works Load tests are easy to configure to increase/decrease the amount of desired requests,JMeter,IntelliJ IDEA, IntelliJ WebStorm, AWS Elastic Beanstalk, AWS Lambda, Microsoft Access, DockerSoapUI: The best available test tool for Web Services.Our company has several IT teams with many projects that either offer new API to our other sub-systems, or utilize our web services as a part of Enterprise Serial Bus (ESB). For example, we have OSS projects that provide public RESTful API to higher layers such as GUI portals, and at the same time use private API of many sub systems such as AAA, NMS, JMS, ACS and so on. Most of our private web services are based on SOAP or JSON. For above reasons, SoapUI became a vital part of our testing and automation activities. We use SoapUI (both free and pro versions) for extensive regression testing, data-driven smoke tests, Mocking web services and even sometime for a quick load & performance test.,SoapUI NG Pro is a prefect tool for setting up complicated test cases with many steps including parameterized Web Service requests, response assertions, data generators, data sources, data sinks (report recorders) and more You can use Groovy or JavaScript for more complicated automation such as validating the results, extracting data, using external Java libraries or running system processes. Groovy IDE is compatible with Java and you can easily write your code in Java with very few modifications. SoapUI enables you to run multiple test suites in parallel or in a loop, and provide user friendly reports including all test case results and test case coverage. SoapUI NG Pro lets you to perform security test against your web services with predefined scenarios such as xml bombing, xml injection, sql injection, buffer overflow tests, monkey testing and so on. SoapUI NG Pro, offers a simple but practical solution for low to medium load testing scenarios. You can obtain many more Load and Performance testing features by extending your license with purchasing LoadUI Pro.,For JMS interactions, SoapUI relies on HermesJMS which is a 3rd party program and outdated. You can not easily run parallel tests suites when JMS sessions are involved. SoapUI can easily cover LDAP for both testing and data-driven purposes but this feature is not provided yet. As of 2015, SmartBear Software is enforcing the Pro users to use their All-in-One integrated platform: Ready!API . This tool is very slow in comparison with the SoapUI itself. For example, loading a project takes up to 15 seconds in a decent computer, so does clicking on different tabs for the first time.,10,Very quick regression testing, hence having the testing results very soon, even the same day of deployment for same above reason, it can save money for corporation (so no tedious, costly and erroneous manual testings) The test reports are compatible with TestNG, so the corporation can integrate the reports in our Autamation frameworks such as Allure or Jira Zephyr,JMeter, DHC and PostMan,JMeter, Eclipse LunaSoapUI despite the name is not a slipery tool that one always has problems grasping. In fact, it's the opposite!!As a major hosting and Cloud company, we have thousands upon thousand of API that make calls across several programs, usually in very complex variations that involves coordinating not only testing back end of applications and API calls, but how they work and integrate with one another as we simulate a live production environment So, SoapUI, after examining several different tools was the best candidate with all the modules and feature we needed to complete our testing. We did take a few steps further, due to the amount of tests that needed to run concurrently most of the time. But at the end, we managed to get maximum coverage of testing with a high degree of accuracy as we put in place redundant validation points.,Ability to combine multiple test and adhere to the sequence that they need to run in order to complete successfully, regardless of pass or fail, the result is accurate. Excellent GUI design to make it as organic for the tester as they are revising or updating their tests. Once you get comfortable with the core functionality of SoapUI, you can explore the many added capabilities it has, like utilizing groovy or JavaScript. You can provide input and output files for the tests to use in sequence or randomly. Excellent reporting mechanism and options to print or to save to file. Also you can include verbose debugging content or create a shorter executive summary version. We even went as far as importing it to SQL database for cataloging and archiving for the sake of better tractability.,Memory consumption, in large concurrent testing has been a challenge for SoapUI, mostly due to the amount of information that is getting written to the database, but there are workarounds to custom install SoapUI which for example runs on a Cloud server, where it can provide SoapUI the elasticity that it may need with large concurrent tests that run for while before completing. compatibility with all other databases and Open Cloud environment such as OpenStack out there in Open source, which I think is already in works. Integration of LoadUI is good, but to take serious step to compete with other performance and load testing tools,9,On time completion of testing always translates and effects the ROI Accuracy and ability to meet the test coverage % that was planned also effect the confidence of the stakeholders Testers ramp up using SoapUI, therefore continue to become more and more efficient.,,75,75,API Calls clustered to test each one, as well as put a strain on the application and database to find the thresholds of it's load capabilities. Creating a nightly regression testing routine that would take several hours to complete. Tap into the raw data SoapUI generated, aside from standard reporting to find weaknesses, and potential risk areas.,Using the data via linking it to an external database for a deeper look, and establishing better tractability.,TBD,10,Yes,Product Features Product Usability Product Reputation Prior Experience with the Product,I think a very thorough evaluation of the development, build and deployment, and testing tool is just good practice. Specially if it is a brand new product you have started to build. It eliminates the possibility of having to go back and revise your plan, if you have done the due diligent properly.,9,Yes,long conference calls with support engineer to resolve the memory issue bogging down the test machines, and kept at it until a workaround was in place and a hot-fix patch was applied.,REST Calls, API calls Simulating live use by combining various calls that were dependent on one another, or another external return response to the call.,Yes, but I don't use it,9,7,9,8Best product for the costWe use SoapUI Pro to cover automated, functional testing of our web services (SOAP/XML and REST/JSON primarily). It is used to the greatest extent in the QA department, but other client implementation teams also use some of it's basic functionality. Some of the key features we use are data source linking, Groovy scripting, and composite projects to facilitate our needs. It enables us to provide better coverage of expected results.,Ease of use and setup, particularly with SOAP services where you have the WSDL. Import and go. If your WSDL changes you can update the definition or refactor it, which is a life saver. Decent GUI - I feel the GUI is well thought out in most areas. Scripting and Plugins - Allows setting of a script repository (Pro). In general, you can script in Groovy or JavaScript throughout a project. We use Groovy and haven't run into anything we haven't been able to find a solution to through scripting. For plugins, we've written some custom ones in Java to add menu items. To use them you just have to drop the jar file in a specific directory. Community - The community via blogs and forums is great. If you run into issues you can normally find someone else who had a similar problem. The response on the forums from SmartBear is also good. They also recently added an 'API Dojo' which is very informational.,REST - They have come a long way, but there could still be improvements here. I find the learning curve much higher and not as straight forward using REST vs SOAP. Composite Projects - I'd really like to see them implement something around saving/refreshing Test Suites when using the Composite project ability in Pro. This is currently an enhancement in feature backlog (see their forum for more details). Functionality around Projects and Test Cases seems pretty sound.,10,Less defects make it out of test environments Low Cost on Licensing,10A review from moderate experience point of view.We are using SoapUI among a small portion of our programming team for use in our development and testing of web services.,Incredibly easy to use and set up. Does the majority of work for you. Great interface. You can get a lot of information on screen at once. Has a high level of customization. Being able to modify settings relevant to your needs is a breeze.,In my use I honestly have not had any negative issues with SoapUI.,9,Has had a big impact on quality of our web service code. Very inexpensive investment if you do a lot of web service work.,,8,2,2SoapUI - Developer's and Tester's Best FriendSoapUI is being used for functional testing in our organization as well as other organization that I have worked with. Its been used by the development and testing team majorly. It's used for unit testing by the development team. It supports multiple protocols such as SOAP, REST, HTTP etc.. It helps in creating mock services and supports scripting which are really useful in creating automated unit testing. Its been used by the performance testing team to run the load testing which is one of the most important testing before the product goes live. Since web services are widely used by product these days SoapUI can be great tool to use these web services easily and efficiently. The tools can be used by almost all departments from development to operations support.,SoapUI is really easy to use and has a very small learning curve. It doesn't really matter if you are a programmer or not you can pick up SoapUI quickly. The user interface is really very intuitive. Since it supports many protocols such as SOAP, REST, HTTP, JMS etc.. it greatly helps the developer to use a single tool and not jump around tools. SoapUI can help create really advanced Load test scenarios really quickly. It can also integrate with LoadUI which has superior Load Testing Experience. There are plugins available for IDE's such as Eclipse, NetBeans and IntelliJ. So if people prefer using the SoapUI inside the IDE they can use it as well instead of opening another tool. It is capable of creating mock services for all kind of web services which is very important for testing.,The only disadvantage I could think off right now is that its Plugins for IDE's don't work as well. But that shouldn't keep you from using it. You can always use the SoapUI tool instead of the plugins.,9,Better test coverage. Helps operations support team to turn around the tickets quickly. Small learning curve.,9SoapUI for automated test managementI have used SoapUI at different organizations throughout my career. SoapUI is a great tool for putting an interface on top of the common SOAP object access interfaces. SoapUI is both highly scalable and configurable, allowing custom test script creation to automate test activities including data manipulation, project validation, web services testing and validation and many other features. I have used SoapUI and SoapUI Pro to create automated test scripts, validate software and also complete basic load testing. The PRO interface will allow more functionality like looping tests more easily, that can also be beneficial to a test team, .,Automation Test Script Management Black Box Test Scripting,Global technical support staff,10,You will instantly gain ROI with SoapUI if you are a manual QA or Testing shop. SoapUI offers a lot of help and support, both online and over the phone to help get you started. The more you know about the tool, the more ROI you will realize.,,10SoapUI an ideal solution for customersSoapUI was useful in overcoming a barrier to adoption for the customer base. The application it tested was a very complex analysis platform and a robust method of validating its results to domain experts was a pain point for the company and the QA department. SoapUI was selected for it's easy to understand and operate interface to perform automated testing using real world data to establish a baseline for validation prior to customization.,Assertion tests: Given complex examples tests users can ascertain if a particular logic is properly implemented both from a positive test, negative test, exemption test.... Results Aggregation: Tests can be packaged to provide high-level results, all tests failed, mandatory tests passed, etc... Manual Edits of Soap Request & Viewing of Responses: Allow users to modify data on the fly in a simple interface and allows examination of results in real-time,Packaging of tests is not trivial, we wrote a program to actually convert from a repository data into the SoapUI project file; scalability was on our side since the testing ran into hundreds of cases. The project file was complex in design so it took efforts to learn it sufficiently to update it.,9,Reduced the cost to complete deployment and perform acceptance testing Increased the ability to perform regression and detect performance impact between releases,,8SoapUI is best in the leagueWe use SoapUI to verify all our APIs across multiple products. All the products have multiple interfaces: SOAP, REST, AMF, and JDBC. Primary focus is functional testing.,Groovy scripting throughout! SoapUI can be extended to the limits of your imagination with Groovy. Add in the ability to import any .jar makes it very easy to create new functionality. WSDL refactoring is a very useful feature, especially in the early stages when the API is still being developed. This allows you to map existing tests to a new method that has been possibly renamed or even one who's parameters may have changed. Fully command-line driven allows tests to be scheduled with a task manager, or run through Maven from any continuous integration system. Recent release of API Dojo gives a lot of detailed information to the beginner as well as advanced users.,JMS is the ugly step-child. Although the protocol is supported, the support is very limited. JMS is supported through a third-party add on (Hermes JMS), which is now very outdated (last update was 3 years ago). AMF is the other ugly step-child. AMF does not have any method discovery, so you need third-party tools (BlazeMonster) to help you craft your messages. REST, although this protocol was the main focus of the latest 5.0 release, still has some edge issues. Browse the SoapUI fora for details. Some parts of the documentation are outdated / incomplete.,10,Lower the number of defects that get to production. Being able to craft specific messages, it is much easier to reproduce edge case problems. Tool can also be used for (very fast) data load runs into test environments.,curl,10soapUI is an Indespensible Web Service ToolAt Yahoo, we used soapUI as our primary web service testing and troubleshooting tool. Our Technical Account Management team used SoapUI on a near daily basis to analyze SOAP messages from external customers and to help test and troubleshoot issues with Yahoo's various ad platforms.,Immediate access to and ability to execute web service requests Very elegant and simple to use UI Includes very useful features for developing test projects and supporting multiple WSDL versions,I recall having some issues with SoapUI on Mac. I haven't used it on a Mac so I'm admittedly not sure if these issues have since been resolved. I never had any issues with it on a Windows machine.,10,At Yahoo, we were able to test and troubleshoot SOAP based API issues within a matter of minutes. SoapUI allowed us to replicate the exact issue our customers were experiencing. All we needed from the client was a SOAP request/response and we could use that, in conjunction with SoapUI, to replicate the exact issue our customers were experiencing.,,8
Unspecified
SoapUI Pro
115 Ratings
Score 8.3 out of 101
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>TRScore

SoapUI Pro Reviews

<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring#question3' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>Customer Verified: Read more.</a>
SoapUI Pro
115 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.3 out of 101

Do you work for this company?

Show Filters 
Hide Filters 
Filter 115 vetted SoapUI Pro reviews and ratings
Clear all filters
Overall Rating
Reviewer's Company Size
Last Updated
By Topic
Industry
Department
Experience
Job Type
Role

Reviews (1-25 of 36)

Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why.
No photo available
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
I use SoapUI whenever I need to test various endpoints be REST or SOAP. I usually set up various projects for different environments and within each project I setup multiple endpoints we want to test. I like the easiness of using the application to quickly debug any issues in any of our environments. I can get to the issue quickly and test it in multiple environments at the same time. I like the way I can jump from endpoint to endpoint with just switching windows back and forth and compare results in the same window and not worry about copying text to another text editor. I can do my workflow in the same application.
  • Organization of different endpoints and environments.
  • Easiness of use.
  • Quickly debug issues with endpoints.
  • Some times the UI freezes and I lose all my data.
  • Dated UI.
  • Autosave option.
Well suited to test and debug various endpoints in different environments. Setting up projects is a breeze and it can be done in no time and the option to import other Soup UI projects is very useful this way a test suite can be passed along several developers to start testing the same or create more test cases.
Read this authenticated review
No photo available
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
It is being used from time to time for testing our web services. I help developers to find and rectify issues, if any, before implementing it on the development system. It clears doubts about the functionality and output of the web service call.
  • Can be easily used by technical and non-technical staff in multiple environments that are familiar to them.
  • Its data-driven testing capabilities and real-world condition testing save a lot more time that can be put to some other usage.
  • It simplifies regression testing and clearly shows the test approach used and testing areas covered.
  • Test results and functionality can be tracked easily using test history and result comparison.
  • Its report building template is very cool and understandable they provide and highlights each and every required information in a better way.
  • It is quite heavy for old systems - The lite version could be beneficial for such old machines.
SoapUI Pro is well suited when there is lack of testing staff or when your company needs through regression testing on a regular basis. It helps to use time efficiently and provide accurate results with lesser usage of manpower. It gives a brief idea about the output of your web services before actual implementation into your system.
Read this authenticated review
valentine leamy profile photo
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
Testing has been made really easy and quality has been improved manifold. The code coverage has also been increased thus improving overall customer satisfaction.
  • The SoapUI tool is the best out there when you need to test a web service with ease.
  • Great collaboration features, especially the scripts repository available in the paid version.
  • Documentation should be better, despite being a simple tool to use.
  • Sometimes the huge amount of configuration parameters could be overwhelming, luckily there is tons of information on the web and forums to solve any question or problem.
SmartBear is a desktop based application for API testing. With the help of this tool, my organization ensures the quality and performance of web-based applications. Drag and drop functionality saved a lot of my time, we don't need to write code manually repetitively. Requires prior knowledge of the product to be able to take advantage of the tool in its entirety.
Read valentine leamy's full review
Shankar Cheedella profile photo
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We use SOAPUI to test our web API calls and we did create a couple of projects inside of this tool to address different legacy projects. This tool is nice and handy when you need to test the bunch of different calls like GET and PUT, and POST. It also saves our work and can be easily picked up next time we need to test that API call. It also allows you to save user credentials to test the API call. We also tried Fiddler and Postman before coming to this. Somehow, this felt easy to maintain when testing the web API calls. I would recommend this product to my network friends.
  • Can be used to test all WEB API calls
  • All rest calls with an association with DataPower or Stone Bond can be tested efficiently.
  • Can store your work so that it can be picked up next time.
  • Would be nice if it stored the results of each call.
  • UI can be redesigned to give user-friendly exp compared to Postman.
Small to big industries can work with this tool.
Read Shankar Cheedella's full review
David Crawford profile photo
Score 5 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We use it primarily for REST troubleshooting and authentication testing. It's the only application of its kind available on our locked-down development environment currently. We also use it for SOAP troubleshooting, as a lot of our medical data transfers use this standard.
  • Managing different testing environments through projects.
  • Makes a clear distinction between REST and SOAP troubleshooting.
  • There are a lot of options available that support various data standards, some that are more obscure but help the person that needs it.
  • When you need to just do a quick REST test, it takes too long to get everything setup from a new project.
  • Adding authentications can be a pain, and if it's basic auth then you have to base64 encode it yourself.
  • The UI used to be pretty ugly. Their update to it recently seemed to just put a flat look on everything to make it seem modern but didn't actually overhaul much. Buttons still jump around and move/shift when other dynamic areas change during a test that goes through a bunch of calls. Also, they still use child windows to control all the views, which isn't very nice to work with considering no other development application I use does that.
Managing lots of different projects and domains to test is easier with SoapUI, it's not good for doing a quick test on something new or a one-off thing.
Read David Crawford's full review
Pankaj Rawat profile photo
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
SoapUI is an powerful tool for API testing and solid framework.As it is an open source tool, it is totally free for everyone who use web service testing. We send services ad send data through webservices . We can declare the variables and change the values parameters without having code in our test cases. We just load the WSDL address and it shows us all the methods and then we submit the variables and send it and get the result. its interfere is easy to learn
  • Easy to use
  • Test out web services
  • Better hands on groovy
  • It shows an error if the request has special characters.
  • Writing upload test cases is a bit difficult
  • Virtual services are not supported
Easy to install with a great interface. We just need to put the WSDL URL and it shows us all the methods present in the WSDL location. We only need to submit the variables and send them and it shows the output in split screen with success or error.
Read Pankaj Rawat's full review
Prikshit Sood profile photo
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We use SoapUI in our organisation to simulate web services. There is a WSDL location which we copy and paste onto the SoapUI. After that we run XMLs through which data directly flows into our systems.
  • Acts as a great external source to get data onto the main system.
  • Runs all kinds of XMLs irrespective of their size.
  • Great tool for API testing.
  • Saving projects can be a little confusing for beginners.
  • Sometimes it functions a bit slow for complex XMLs.
  • UI is a bit outdated now and needs to get a new refreshing look.
This tool comes in handy when you need to retrieve data through web services. Catches all the errors easily and displays them line by line.
Read Prikshit Sood's full review
Binoy Shah profile photo
December 19, 2018

A happy and proud user

Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
Our whole organization is using SoapUI NG Pro. Specifically, it's being widely used across all QA departments for Webservice testing. All the REST and SOAP API testing projects are being tested using SoapUI NG Pro. We are testing REST and SOAP APIs manually as well as automate them using SoapUI NG Pro.
  • Test validation on API responses
  • Mock services to test parts of the application
  • REST Discovery and Groovy scripting features
  • Working with Git needs to be improved.
  • The licenses could be more flexible with regards to floating licenses. In the case that a user changes a workstation, then the license locked to a certain workstation cannot be easily changed to another workstation. It would be more flexible if a license could be linked with the user personally.
SoapUI NG Pro is well suited for web service automation. It it less appropriate when it comes to code like reusable components or modular approach.
Read Binoy Shah's full review
Ayush Rastogi profile photo
December 18, 2018

API testing using SOAPUI

Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We have used SoapUI for an automation testing of API's. Used test runner to run scheduler jobs which will automatically do the health checks of API's and update the status in the database. Later, that data is used to build dashboards which shows which API's are up and which are down along with the error details. It is used as part of monitoring test environments by environment teams. Test results and dashboards really help the environment team to find out the problematic component and help to create a mitigation plan.
  • Create test cases and test suites for testing API's
  • Test both SOAP and REST web services.
  • Test runners for running automated jobs.
  • It can be made more user-friendly, beginner users struggle to use the interface. For example, learning how to add request headers for different types.
  • Hermes JMS is slow for testing MQ services and struggled to use SOAPUI over other message queue tools.
It's very good for testing SOAP/REST web services, also we can create test cases and test suites to do the automated testing.
Read Ayush Rastogi's full review
Daniel Sanchez profile photo
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
SoapUI is implemented by the systems team. We use it for the realization of SOAP or REST requests of the different web services that we manage for our clients.
  • Rapid import of web services. Just by placing the url where the service is located, the application is responsible for directly detecting the .asmx and creates the necessary structure to work on it.
  • The interface is quite simple to work with, which makes it one of the most convenient applications to manage SOAP or REST projects. Besides, it also generates a self-saving of projects or requests that have not been previously saved.
  • Accepts multiple types of media to send in POST requests, including the most used JSON and XML.
  • What should be improved is the way in which the multiple queries that are made are displayed. It should allow you to see it in the form of tabs and not cover all the contents of the window.
Excellent for testing the connectivity and responses of web services or endpoints that are hosted within any application. However, there are scenarios where it is not very effective; for example, the requests that are made in authentication protocols.
Read Daniel Sanchez's full review
No photo available
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
I am a technical product manager. While we are dealing with opening new services via our product, it becomes very vital to test the input and output of services to look for all possible values. It is used by all system/business analysts and product managers across the whole organization. It seems there is no better alternative because it is a compact tool and makes analysts' and product managers' lives easier while dealing with the whole functionality of our products.
  • Easy to see all possible methods of a web service, easy to create many different possible requests.
  • The formatted view makes it easy to see the whole request and response.
  • It's easy to share via colleagues including all possible trials.
  • Some features could be added via add ons like an HTTP monitor, test runner, some artifacts. With them, it becomes a big installation (modularity).
  • Sometimes it takes some time to open the interface; it is important to have a faster interface in today's applications.
  • It could include input and output beautifiers - this would make users happy because they may use this feature heavily while they are making documentation.
For integration between two different systems, it is well-suited to show what parameters the client system should send and receive. In order to format output, SoapUI is less appropriate, and it is required to use other formatting tools.
Read this authenticated review
Sean Worle profile photo
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
SoapUI is used primarily by developers looking to connect to and develop against our suite of enterprise services. It makes testing and discovery easy for them. Additionally, our services developers use SoapUI to test and support the services they write. Without having to write any code, the structure of services can be quickly examined, and specific use cases tested. When the code is not behaving as expected, running a quick request in SoapUI is often the fastest way to narrow down the source of the problem.
  • Quickly and easily discover and connect to service endpoints
  • Create and save test requests for easy re-use
  • Immediate "is the service up and responding" checks.
  • The UI is written in Java, and as such sometimes behaves in unexpected ways - ways that a native Windows UI would not.
  • Startup time can often be painfully slow. Once the program is running, it performs well, but starting up can sometimes take nearly a full minute. I believe this is also due to having been written in Java.
  • I used to consistently get errors about not having enough memory for the program to start up (in spite of having far more memory than it will ever need in my machine). I solved the problem by manually tweaking the startup script to allocate more memory to the Java Runtime Engine. However, this solution seems to have exacerbated the slow startup time I mentioned above.
While SoapUI can be used to access REST-style HTTP services, there are other tools that are better suited for this task. As its name suggests, where SoapUI shines is accessing and testing SOAP services. We still find this to be very useful, as we still have a number of SOAP services to maintain. Unfortunately, this will likely become less relevant as time goes on. The industry has clearly moved towards HTTP RESTful services.
Read Sean Worle's full review
Deepak Kushwaha profile photo
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
Until now, I have suggested three of our clients to use SOAP UI for their automated testing. I am an Integration developer and love automation (CI/CD). For leveraging the full advantages of DevOps lifecyle, we wanted to automate our assembly test cases for SOAP and REST APIs. After a bit of R&D across the market, I came to know the amazing features of SOAP UI Pro. We can write test cases, can use custom assertions with Groovy and can do a lot of cool stuff with SOAP UI. The best thing which pushes us to buy soap UI is its ability to execute TestSuite from outside of the SOAP UI IDE with Maven support. This is what we wanted to use in a DevOps environment, a testing framework which can be executed from outside with Maven. The another cool thing about SOAP UI is the reporting. It is very detailed and a person with minimal technical background can understand it easily.
  • Full Support for SOAP Services Testing. It will help you to create envelopes and headers to satisfy WS-Security, WS-Addressing etc.
  • The wide range of assertion options. If you are still not satisfied, you can write your own assertion with the help of Groovy script and can use any Java library to do so.
  • The Maven Support. You can simply export a TestSuite from SOAP UI and run it from outside on your CI/CD tool (i.e. Jenkins, Gitlab etc) with the help of Maven.
  • The User Interface of SOAPUI is very oldish.
  • Sometimes it acts weird, like if you change/remove any header in the request it will not go away until you restart SOAP UI. So the changes does not reflect immediately. I guess is something with UI only.
  • Can add basic assertion like JSON match, XML Match , Json Schema Validation etc.
It is best suited for CI/CD. The Maven support is superb with minimal dependencies. For Rest APIs , It still needs some improvement but for SOAP It is the best tool in the market. So if your requirement is to test both SOAP and REST, go for it and If its only REST which you want to test, you can look for alternatives.
Read Deepak Kushwaha's full review
Nikita kumari profile photo
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
It is used to create different types of web services and test those services. It helps to integrate test web services and verify that there is no bug in the newly developed web service. This tool is also used to get the XML response and store it into the system.
  • Provide support to fully test newly developed web services.
  • Easy GUI interface which helps to add customers' credentials easily while using web service.
  • An easy way to get a response through with the help of auto-created request XML.
  • It should add more GUI option which can show syntax error while adding new request XML.
  • Adding credentials is a little bit confusing as it does not show any hit.
  • It should allow sending the null value in request XML tags.
This tool reduces the overall workload to test web services manually as we can fully test newly developed web services using this tool. It also provides a very simple interface which is easy for those are not from this background.
Read Nikita kumari's full review
Parry Ghuman profile photo
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
This tool has been used by developers and integrators to develop/test the various kinds of web services. It is also used to create xml schemas and xsd files. This tool also helps to daily download micro power grid data and store in databases.
  • Helps to retrieve the data from any web service without developing any code.
  • Easy to create complex xml schemas and xsd.
  • Easy to find any error in xml request and response.
  • Difficult to add certificate file with request as it does not return any particular error if certificate is invalid.
  • It should add auto-trigger request functionality.
  • It takes time to request large sized data.
Easy to retrieve data from any web services without developing complex algorithm code. It also help the developer build web applications and web services with maximum accuracy. It reduces the work load of integrators as they can test web services easily.
Read Parry Ghuman's full review
No photo available
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We use Soap UI to test RESTful and WSDL web services creating scenarios to validate them after new changes.
  • It enables creation of parametrized tests
  • It supports RESTful web services
  • It allows creation of test scenarios
  • You can create load tests using it
  • Allowing versioning scripts to test
  • Integration with IDEs as a plugin
  • CI integration
It works awesome to test any kind of web services, we particularly are using for testing:
- SOAP Web services
- RestFul web services
Read this authenticated review
Payam Pirooznia profile photo
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
Our company has several IT teams with many projects that either offer new API to our other sub-systems, or utilize our web services as a part of Enterprise Serial Bus (ESB).
For example, we have OSS projects that provide public RESTful API to higher layers such as GUI portals, and at the same time use private API of many sub systems such as AAA, NMS, JMS, ACS and so on. Most of our private web services are based on SOAP or JSON.
For above reasons, SoapUI became a vital part of our testing and automation activities. We use SoapUI (both free and pro versions) for extensive regression testing, data-driven smoke tests, Mocking web services and even sometime for a quick load & performance test.
  • SoapUI NG Pro is a prefect tool for setting up complicated test cases with many steps including parameterized Web Service requests, response assertions, data generators, data sources, data sinks (report recorders) and more
  • You can use Groovy or JavaScript for more complicated automation such as validating the results, extracting data, using external Java libraries or running system processes. Groovy IDE is compatible with Java and you can easily write your code in Java with very few modifications.
  • SoapUI enables you to run multiple test suites in parallel or in a loop, and provide user friendly reports including all test case results and test case coverage.
  • SoapUI NG Pro lets you to perform security test against your web services with predefined scenarios such as xml bombing, xml injection, sql injection, buffer overflow tests, monkey testing and so on.
  • SoapUI NG Pro, offers a simple but practical solution for low to medium load testing scenarios. You can obtain many more Load and Performance testing features by extending your license with purchasing LoadUI Pro.
  • For JMS interactions, SoapUI relies on HermesJMS which is a 3rd party program and outdated. You can not easily run parallel tests suites when JMS sessions are involved.
  • SoapUI can easily cover LDAP for both testing and data-driven purposes but this feature is not provided yet.
  • As of 2015, SmartBear Software is enforcing the Pro users to use their All-in-One integrated platform: Ready!API . This tool is very slow in comparison with the SoapUI itself. For example, loading a project takes up to 15 seconds in a decent computer, so does clicking on different tabs for the first time.
SopaUI is the best choice when it comes to testing complicated combination of web services such as RESTful, SOAP, JSON and AMF. Although It can also cover simple HTML GUI test cases by calling web page elements as a recorded order, but it is not a good choice for testing user interfaces or as a replacement to Selenium.
Read Payam Pirooznia's full review
Christopher Saleh profile photo
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
As a major hosting and Cloud company, we have thousands upon thousand of API that make calls across several programs, usually in very complex variations that involves coordinating not only testing back end of applications and API calls, but how they work and integrate with one another as we simulate a live production environment

So, SoapUI, after examining several different tools was the best candidate with all the modules and feature we needed to complete our testing. We did take a few steps further, due to the amount of tests that needed to run concurrently most of the time. But at the end, we managed to get maximum coverage of testing with a high degree of accuracy as we put in place redundant validation points.
  • Ability to combine multiple test and adhere to the sequence that they need to run in order to complete successfully, regardless of pass or fail, the result is accurate.
  • Excellent GUI design to make it as organic for the tester as they are revising or updating their tests. Once you get comfortable with the core functionality of SoapUI, you can explore the many added capabilities it has, like utilizing groovy or JavaScript. You can provide input and output files for the tests to use in sequence or randomly.
  • Excellent reporting mechanism and options to print or to save to file. Also you can include verbose debugging content or create a shorter executive summary version. We even went as far as importing it to SQL database for cataloging and archiving for the sake of better tractability.
  • Memory consumption, in large concurrent testing has been a challenge for SoapUI, mostly due to the amount of information that is getting written to the database, but there are workarounds to custom install SoapUI which for example runs on a Cloud server, where it can provide SoapUI the elasticity that it may need with large concurrent tests that run for while before completing.
  • compatibility with all other databases and Open Cloud environment such as OpenStack out there in Open source, which I think is already in works.
  • Integration of LoadUI is good, but to take serious step to compete with other performance and load testing tools
Well, obviously if the technology and application back end is supported by SoapUI, which 98% of time, it is. However, there are new methods other than Rest, etc. are coming out that would require SoapUI to be compatible. Also, built in popular add-on such as AWS support can be expanded to support similar companies to Amazon.
Read Christopher Saleh's full review
Natalie Colyer profile photo
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We use SoapUI Pro to cover automated, functional testing of our web services (SOAP/XML and REST/JSON primarily). It is used to the greatest extent in the QA department, but other client implementation teams also use some of it's basic functionality. Some of the key features we use are data source linking, Groovy scripting, and composite projects to facilitate our needs. It enables us to provide better coverage of expected results.
  • Ease of use and setup, particularly with SOAP services where you have the WSDL. Import and go. If your WSDL changes you can update the definition or refactor it, which is a life saver.
  • Decent GUI - I feel the GUI is well thought out in most areas.
  • Scripting and Plugins - Allows setting of a script repository (Pro). In general, you can script in Groovy or JavaScript throughout a project. We use Groovy and haven't run into anything we haven't been able to find a solution to through scripting. For plugins, we've written some custom ones in Java to add menu items. To use them you just have to drop the jar file in a specific directory.
  • Community - The community via blogs and forums is great. If you run into issues you can normally find someone else who had a similar problem. The response on the forums from SmartBear is also good. They also recently added an 'API Dojo' which is very informational.
  • REST - They have come a long way, but there could still be improvements here. I find the learning curve much higher and not as straight forward using REST vs SOAP.
  • Composite Projects - I'd really like to see them implement something around saving/refreshing Test Suites when using the Composite project ability in Pro. This is currently an enhancement in feature backlog (see their forum for more details). Functionality around Projects and Test Cases seems pretty sound.
I think you'd get the most out of SoapUI if you had some scripting knowledge and basic starting knowledge of the technology you're trying to automate (XML/JSON/etc), even if it isn't required to get going. While the GUI does a good job of getting you started I feel you'd be missing out and may have a tougher learning curve when trying to implement more advanced scenarios.
Read Natalie Colyer's full review
Brant Hestrup profile photo
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We are using SoapUI among a small portion of our programming team for use in our development and testing of web services.
  • Incredibly easy to use and set up. Does the majority of work for you.
  • Great interface. You can get a lot of information on screen at once.
  • Has a high level of customization. Being able to modify settings relevant to your needs is a breeze.
  • In my use I honestly have not had any negative issues with SoapUI.
If you have a WSDL already defined it functions great. It makes generating the test suites incredibly easy. Admittedly this is my only use case of the application so I am a bit biased but I have been pleased with it.
Read Brant Hestrup's full review
Vineet Sahu profile photo
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
SoapUI is being used for functional testing in our organization as well as other organization that I have worked with. Its been used by the development and testing team majorly. It's used for unit testing by the development team. It supports multiple protocols such as SOAP, REST, HTTP etc.. It helps in creating mock services and supports scripting which are really useful in creating automated unit testing. Its been used by the performance testing team to run the load testing which is one of the most important testing before the product goes live. Since web services are widely used by product these days SoapUI can be great tool to use these web services easily and efficiently. The tools can be used by almost all departments from development to operations support.
  • SoapUI is really easy to use and has a very small learning curve. It doesn't really matter if you are a programmer or not you can pick up SoapUI quickly. The user interface is really very intuitive.
  • Since it supports many protocols such as SOAP, REST, HTTP, JMS etc.. it greatly helps the developer to use a single tool and not jump around tools.
  • SoapUI can help create really advanced Load test scenarios really quickly. It can also integrate with LoadUI which has superior Load Testing Experience.
  • There are plugins available for IDE's such as Eclipse, NetBeans and IntelliJ. So if people prefer using the SoapUI inside the IDE they can use it as well instead of opening another tool.
  • It is capable of creating mock services for all kind of web services which is very important for testing.
  • The only disadvantage I could think off right now is that its Plugins for IDE's don't work as well. But that shouldn't keep you from using it. You can always use the SoapUI tool instead of the plugins.
SoapUI is really useful if you are creating a product which will have many users. It has a really good support for Load testing. Its always a good choice for the developers to create unit test scenarios using mock services and scripting. You can create various test scenarios with many mock responses based on the input. You can use most of the features of SoapUI in the free version. Developers really don't require the pro version of the SoapUI. But if you want to do security testing or load testing then you need a pro version for which you need to weigh your options as the pro version is not free.
Read Vineet Sahu's full review
Kory Grandy (SQA) profile photo
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
I have used SoapUI at different organizations throughout my career. SoapUI is a great tool for putting an interface on top of the common SOAP object access interfaces. SoapUI is both highly scalable and configurable, allowing custom test script creation to automate test activities including data manipulation, project validation, web services testing and validation and many other features. I have used SoapUI and SoapUI Pro to create automated test scripts, validate software and also complete basic load testing. The PRO interface will allow more functionality like looping tests more easily, that can also be beneficial to a test team, .
  • Automation
  • Test Script Management
  • Black Box Test Scripting
  • Global technical support staff
This tool may not be beneficial to a team that has a highly integrated, more waterfall or non-agile approach. However, this tool will still aid in testing in either situation.
Read Kory Grandy (SQA)'s full review
Hai-Son &quot;Titi&quot; Nguyen profile photo
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
SoapUI was useful in overcoming a barrier to adoption for the customer base. The application it tested was a very complex analysis platform and a robust method of validating its results to domain experts was a pain point for the company and the QA department. SoapUI was selected for it's easy to understand and operate interface to perform automated testing using real world data to establish a baseline for validation prior to customization.
  • Assertion tests: Given complex examples tests users can ascertain if a particular logic is properly implemented both from a positive test, negative test, exemption test....
  • Results Aggregation: Tests can be packaged to provide high-level results, all tests failed, mandatory tests passed, etc...
  • Manual Edits of Soap Request & Viewing of Responses: Allow users to modify data on the fly in a simple interface and allows examination of results in real-time
  • Packaging of tests is not trivial, we wrote a program to actually convert from a repository data into the SoapUI project file; scalability was on our side since the testing ran into hundreds of cases. The project file was complex in design so it took efforts to learn it sufficiently to update it.
It is very useful for debugging issues with communications, we used it to debug problems with a BPEL application that was having issues communicating with an external web service and was able to resolve through analysis of responses the delta in expected response and actual response formats that were problematic.
Read Hai-Son "Titi" Nguyen's full review
Mark Lehky profile photo
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We use SoapUI to verify all our APIs across multiple products. All the products have multiple interfaces: SOAP, REST, AMF, and JDBC. Primary focus is functional testing.
  • Groovy scripting throughout! SoapUI can be extended to the limits of your imagination with Groovy. Add in the ability to import any .jar makes it very easy to create new functionality.
  • WSDL refactoring is a very useful feature, especially in the early stages when the API is still being developed. This allows you to map existing tests to a new method that has been possibly renamed or even one who's parameters may have changed.
  • Fully command-line driven allows tests to be scheduled with a task manager, or run through Maven from any continuous integration system.
  • Recent release of API Dojo gives a lot of detailed information to the beginner as well as advanced users.
  • JMS is the ugly step-child. Although the protocol is supported, the support is very limited. JMS is supported through a third-party add on (Hermes JMS), which is now very outdated (last update was 3 years ago).
  • AMF is the other ugly step-child. AMF does not have any method discovery, so you need third-party tools (BlazeMonster) to help you craft your messages.
  • REST, although this protocol was the main focus of the latest 5.0 release, still has some edge issues. Browse the SoapUI fora for details.
  • Some parts of the documentation are outdated / incomplete.
Although SoapUI does provide some record-playback style tools to help the beginner, such tests will be very limited. In order to get the most out of the tool, intimate knowledge of the protocol(s) and their technologies is required. SOAP: XML, XPath; REST: JSON.
Read Mark Lehky's full review
Justin Hambleton profile photo
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
At Yahoo, we used soapUI as our primary web service testing and troubleshooting tool. Our Technical Account Management team used SoapUI on a near daily basis to analyze SOAP messages from external customers and to help test and troubleshoot issues with Yahoo's various ad platforms.
  • Immediate access to and ability to execute web service requests
  • Very elegant and simple to use UI
  • Includes very useful features for developing test projects and supporting multiple WSDL versions
  • I recall having some issues with SoapUI on Mac. I haven't used it on a Mac so I'm admittedly not sure if these issues have since been resolved. I never had any issues with it on a Windows machine.
SoapUI, as the name suggests, is one of the best SOAP based web service testing tools.
Read Justin Hambleton's full review

About SoapUI Pro

SoapUI Pro is a powerful REST and SOAP API functional testing tool that enables software developers, QA engineers, and manual testers to work together to create, maintain, and execute complex end-to-end API tests in their CI/CD pipelines without needing to code.

SoapUI Pro Integrations

SoapUI Pro Competitors

Pricing

Has featureFree Trial Available?Yes
Has featureFree or Freemium Version Available?Yes
Does not have featurePremium Consulting/Integration Services Available?No
Entry-level set up fee?No

SoapUI Pro Technical Details

Operating Systems: Unspecified
Mobile Application:No