Overview
What is SpiraTest?
SpiraTest allows customers to manage their software testing and quality assurance activities. It provides requirements management, test management and bug-tracking functionality with integrated reporting.
SpiraTest - very good/solid product
SpiraTest - Can be better!
SpiraTest
SpiraTest - fail
SpiraTest
SpiraTest Review
SpiraTest is the best solution for test management
Intern's Review of SpiraTest
Popular Features
- Centralized test management (8)9.090%
- Defect management (8)9.090%
- Map tests to user stories (8)8.080%
- Test execution reporting (8)5.050%
Pricing
1-User
$6
20-User
$13
10-User
$17
Entry-level set up fee?
- No setup fee
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Features
Test Management
Test management tools are used to manage the entire testing process comprehensively, removing the need for multiple software tools to manage individual steps in the testing process
- 9Centralized test management(8) Ratings
Ability to manages both manual and automated tests from a centralized location
- 7.9Manage test hosts and schedules(4) Ratings
Ease of setup of automated tests and test schedules
- 8Map tests to user stories(8) Ratings
Provide visibility into user story test coverage
- 5Test execution reporting(8) Ratings
Comprehensive reporting on which tests have been run and pass/fail
- 9Defect management(8) Ratings
Ability to automatically log defects and link them to failed tests, and report defect resolution progress
Product Details
- About
- Integrations
- Tech Details
- FAQs
What is SpiraTest?
SpiraTest Features
- Supported: Real-Time Dashboards and Reporting
- Supported: Integrated Requirements, Test and Bug-Tracking
- Supported: Customizable Fields and Workflows
SpiraTest Screenshots
SpiraTest Video
SpiraTest Integrations
SpiraTest Technical Details
Deployment Types | On-premise, Software as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based |
---|---|
Operating Systems | Windows |
Mobile Application | Apple iOS, Android, Windows Phone, Blackberry |
Supported Countries | All |
Supported Languages | French, English, Spanish, German, Chinese, Hungarian, Polish, Finnish |
Frequently Asked Questions
SpiraTest Customer Size Distribution
Consumers | 0% |
---|---|
Small Businesses (1-50 employees) | 30% |
Mid-Size Companies (51-500 employees) | 45% |
Enterprises (more than 500 employees) | 25% |
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(11)Community Insights
- Business Problems Solved
- Recommendations
SpiraTest has proven to be valuable for a range of use cases across various industries. One notable example is its application in the entertainment/hospitality industry, where it has been successfully used for a large and complex project. By making work on requirements agile and enabling scalability for the QA team, SpiraTest has significantly contributed to the success of this project.
JetRuby's quality analysts, project managers, and product owners have also found great value in using SpiraTest for their specific needs. Whether it's solving various problems or streamlining the development process, SpiraTest has proven to be a convenient tool for these roles. Its user-friendly interface has made it easy for the entire organization to adopt, allowing for seamless collaboration between teams.
In addition, SpiraTest's capabilities within the quality assurance department have been highly beneficial. It allows users to run tests on websites and ensure that all features are functioning properly. The ability to assign test cases to specific users has been particularly valuable in testing with actual end users and managing their expectations effectively.
Furthermore, organizations have found that SpiraTest's competitive pricing enables them to allocate enough licenses to accommodate their user base. This allows teams to fully utilize its features without any limitations.
SpiraTest is often used alongside Excel sheets, offering a more efficient way of sorting requirements, tests, and progress. This integration significantly improves productivity by simplifying workflow management.
One feature that stands out among users is SpiraTest's cloning capability, which allows for linking similar test cases. This feature has received high praise as it saves time and effort by eliminating the need to create repetitive test cases from scratch.
Overall, SpiraTest has successfully addressed various user needs and provided solutions across different industries. Its simplicity, flexibility, and powerful features make it a valuable tool for improving project management, collaboration, and overall efficiency.
Users have made several recommendations for SpiraTest based on their experiences with the software. First, many users suggest trying the trial version of SpiraTest to become familiar with its features and capabilities before making a purchasing decision. Second, users highly recommend SpiraTest for both small and large-scale industries, as it reduces manual work and automates tasks effectively. They believe it provides scalability and flexibility for integration with other applications. Lastly, several users recommend SpiraTest for its ease of use and accurate analysis of test results. They find running tests with SpiraTest to be easy and effective, making it a valuable tool for any organization in need of high-quality software that is easy to use.
Attribute Ratings
Reviews
(1-5 of 5)SpiraTest - very good/solid product
- Easily link and associate artifacts
- Webforms/web UI is intuitive
- Lots of flexibility with filtering and sorting
- Search function (across all products) is very useful
- Custom report generation needs to be easier. It has a steep learning curve.
- It should be easier to copy and paste items in artifacts - particularly collections of test steps.
- It is difficult (impossible?) to share artifacts among different SpiraPlan 'products'
- SpiraPlan does not have a workflow structure that allows for multiple approvers of artifacts. This feature should be added.
- requirements management
- test case management
- software source control
- Centralized test management
- 90%9.0
- Manage test hosts and schedules
- N/AN/A
- Map tests to user stories
- 80%8.0
- Test execution reporting
- 50%5.0
- Defect management
- 90%9.0
- Most of SpiraPlan is easy and intuitive to use so employees have been quickly productive
- Artifact linking saves tracking time and is very easy for anyone to do
- custom test creation will still take a LOT of time
SpiraTest - fail
- A clean view of test case steps, expected results and the ability to record a result for each step quickly on one page per test set. This really helps testers work through executing manual test cases.
- Hierarchical structure of releases and builds, requirements, and test cases.
- Can quickly build test sets and/or test runs per build/release.
- Simple identification of each test case, requirement, test run, build, release, etc.
- While there are some nice, live reports, test results per build/release is an obvious omission. The canned reports that can be configured are mostly text based. Some graphs included in those would be a nice addition.
- Recording a Fail for a test step does not facilitate recording a defect. Defects must be manually reported separately. It would be nice if some standard fields were offered when a failure was recorded (e.g. summary, actual result, expected result, description) were recorded with system-known data such as the test steps (steps to reproduce), release, tester's name, etc. and turned into a defect to be recorded in Spira, or sent to an integrated 3rd party defect tracker (JIRA, Mantis, TFS, etc.).
- While the import (from Excel) tools are nice and work efficiently (2 way sync of data, hierarchy easy to implement, tests can be linked to requirements before import/export), there are some default fields I would like to have seen included in there so I could import the 1500+ test cases with less post import/export data manipulation required in Spira across the imported data
- Centralized test management
- 90%9.0
- Manage test hosts and schedules
- 80%8.0
- Map tests to user stories
- 80%8.0
- Test execution reporting
- 60%6.0
- Defect management
- 50%5.0
- Early days for me. This is still being determined.
- Better reports would improve this.
SpiraTest
- SpiraTest works well in organizing the requirements. The best part is the requirements can be categorized as use case/user story based on the project.
- Defect tracking module of the application can be improved. There are several options for the user while creating a defect and this might be confusing
- User Dashboard page can be improved. Pulling metrics for a project is too complicated.
- Centralized test management
- 70%7.0
- Map tests to user stories
- 90%9.0
- Test execution reporting
- 40%4.0
- Defect management
- 40%4.0
- This tool is not being used by the entire organization yet and hence no impact
SpiraTest Review
- Intergration
- Undo deletes
- Reporting
- Filtering
- Speed
- Integration with automated tools
- Centralized test management
- 70%7.0
- Manage test hosts and schedules
- 80%8.0
- Map tests to user stories
- 90%9.0
- Test execution reporting
- 80%8.0
- Defect management
- 100%10.0
- Release management is easy to track - nothing slips thru the cracks.
SpiraTest is the best solution for test management
- Working on requirements as a team.
- Distribution of testing sets among QA team members.
- One lacks convenient ways of reports customization.
- The SpiraTest to JIRA integration leaves much to be desired. We use a cloud version of SpiraTest and Linux machine hosted JIRA version. To configure the integration we need a server on Windows.
- Centralized test management
- 100%10.0
- Manage test hosts and schedules
- N/AN/A
- Map tests to user stories
- 80%8.0
- Test execution reporting
- 60%6.0
- Defect management
- 20%2.0
- It's hard to say.
- testlink and zephyr