TestComplete

TestComplete

Top Rated
Score 8.3 out of 10
Top Rated
TestComplete

Overview

What is TestComplete?

TestComplete is a test management and functional, performance testing tool, from SmartBear Software headquartered in Somerville, Massachusetts.
Read more

Recent Reviews

Nice Tool

6 out of 10
December 07, 2021
I used [TestComplete] with ASP software in [the] testing team. It is flexible [and easy to] define our automation framework and scripts …
Continue reading
Read all reviews

Awards

Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards

Reviewer Pros & Cons

View all pros & cons

Video Reviews

Leaving a video review helps other professionals like you evaluate products. Be the first one in your network to record a review of TestComplete, and make your voice heard!

Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing

Node-Locked Base

2,256

On Premise
per license

Node-Locked Pro

3,950

On Premise
per license

Float - Base

5,077

On Premise
per license

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee
For the latest information on pricing, visithttps://smartbear.com/product/testcompl…

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting / Integration Services
Return to navigation

Product Demos

Top 3 Functional and Automation Testing Tools (TestComplete, Sauce Labs, Tricentis Tosca)
05:51
Return to navigation

Product Details

What is TestComplete?

TestComplete is designed to help testers and developers easily manage, run, and analyze automated GUI tests across multiple devices, platforms, and environments - enabling teams to improve software quality and speed up time to delivery.

According to the vendor, key business benefits include:
  • Easy-to-Use for All Experience Levels: Use the record and playback feature to run tests or choose from multiple programming languages such as Python, VB.NET, or JavaScript.
  • Instant Access to Real Environments in the Cloud: Get real-time access to the latest devices, resolutions, browsers and operating systems in its cloud lab. Run tests in parallel across more than 2000+ remote environments to improve test speed and coverage.
  • Robust Object Recognition for UI Testing: With TestComplete's robust object identification engine, the user can choose from over 50K object properties across more than 500 control types, including all major frameworks and third-party controls.
  • Built for Continuous Testing: Integrate TestComplete with test automation framework tools, CI systems such as GIT or Jenkins, or Test Management platforms like Jira or QAComplete.

TestComplete Videos

In this video, the TrustRadius team will be talking about the top 3 functional and automation testing tools: TestComplete, Sauce Labs, and Tricentis Tosca.

Watch TestComplete Overview

Watch Create Your First Test in TestComplete.

TestComplete Technical Details

Deployment TypesOn-premise
Operating SystemsWindows
Mobile ApplicationNo

TestComplete Downloadables

Frequently Asked Questions

TestComplete is a test management and functional, performance testing tool, from SmartBear Software headquartered in Somerville, Massachusetts.

Tricentis Tosca, Ranorex Studio, and Katalon Studio are common alternatives for TestComplete.

Reviewers rate Usability highest, with a score of 7.7.

The most common users of TestComplete are from Enterprises (1,001+ employees).
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews

(1-25 of 72)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
We still use both products in our company, since Postman is mainly used for backend automation and TestComplete for frontend automation. The difference is that via Postman you can easily write tests that send different requests to your server, get the response, and compare them to the expected response. Via TestComplete you can easily write tests that check whether the response of your server is processed and displayed correctly in the frontend of your product. So I don't really think you can compare those two since you can use them coherently.
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
TestComplete stacks up against them in terms of GUI and seamless performance. It records each and every step and action been performed in the application and produces a detailed report in a well-structured manner. It can connect and access seamlessly among various databases directly to speed up the testing process.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Below are the points why we selected TestComplete 1. Better UI. 2. Plenty of validation cases supports i.e. checkpoints. 3. Multiple scripting languages. 4. Better accuracy and robustness. 5. Good documentation and Video tutorials. 6. Great support team.
Michal Ignaczak | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
TestStand is a much more complex tool than TestComplete and it's for a little bit different solutions I think. For desktop apps I would use the TestComplete, For Mobile / Web -> Python + Behave + Pytest selenium - TestComplete is much overcomplicated and slow! For embedded/electronics - TestStand Depends on what u want to test.
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
We are using Katalon for web-based applications, mainly because our QA engineers have a strong experience with it. But it does not allow precise item identification in Delphi-based applications and that was a show stopper for us. Having received recommendations for TestComplete, we evaluated it and found that in less than two weeks we were able to write our specialized plugins and start testing our applications.
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
We used before the Coded UI Tests which are in Visual Studio / Azure DevOps, and the tests were impossible to maintain and very very flaky. Then in 2015, we selected TestComplete, as it was clearly the tool with the most feature for desktop UI testing. Selenium was directly discarded as it couldn't test desktop applications. We recently become aware of Ranorex Studio, the feature set seems similar to TestComplete. But with all the time invested in the tests made for TestComplete, a tool switch makes no [sense].
December 06, 2021

Happy to use it

Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
TestComplete is more complete than Cypress.io because Cypress.io is only used to complete end-to-end testing for web apps. These two tools are user friendly and easy to use. For the needs of our company, we have chosen TestComplete for the variety of testing applications.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
TestComplete is a robust test automation tool and not for someone who expects to just record and playback. This can be done with [TestComplete], but the strength of the tool is the ability to code complex actions and capturing of objects. The reporting of results is also excellent with [TestComplete], and with the ability to customize the result comments.
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Selenium gets a lot of mileage for being opensource and free, but in terms of features, ease of use, and the added support and development structure of an enterprise product, TestComplete is the clean cut winner.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
TestComplete was selected after trying multiple product offerings. Initially these product offerings were installed with trail keys, and various factors were weighted and sized based on complexity to install, and ease of use. TestComplete scored higher than any other product offering in our decision matrix. The SmartBear company also has top notch support as well!
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Reseller
I have used UFT, Katalon Studio.
UFT has robust object recognition engine than TestComplete.
For example, Katalon Studio supports Groovy and Java so it is easier for programmers/testers to automate apps in java as it is a popular language, but TC doesn't support it.
Integrations: Katalon Studio supports CircleCI and Bambo and even custom CI/CD integration, but no support from TestComplete.
Cloud Device integrations: Katalon Studio supports LambdaTest, Sauce Labs, browser Stack and custom integration, but no support from TestComplete.


Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
TestComplete gives the best option of record and playback. Also, it does not have any problem with object recognition just like Selenium.

Selenium needs more manual efforts in selecting the object properties and utilizing them. Also, Selenium needs a good command of one coding language to make it to work.

Also, Compare to UFT, TestComplete is more convenient in usability.

If we buy the mobile automation plugin then it removes the complete need of the Appium as well.
Return to navigation