TrustRadius Insights
Users have found that zipBoard is a valuable tool for various use cases, improving task management, communication, and collaboration in …
Starting at $49 5 review links
View PricingOverview
What is zipBoard?
zipBoard supports teams building digital content at scale, making it easier for non technical stakeholders to share feedback using annotations and screenshots. By using zipBoard for collecting feedback for Digital content, users can:Share feedback using annotated screenshots and screen recordings…
Recent Reviews
Leaving a review helps other professionals like you evaluate Online Proofing Software
Be the first one in your network to review zipBoard, and make your voice heard!
Get StartedPricing
Starter Plan
$49
Cloud
5 review links
Team Plan
$89
Cloud
20 review links
Custom
On request
Cloud
review links, managers
Entry-level set up fee?
- $49 per reviewable documentOptional
For the latest information on pricing, visithttp://zipboard.co/pricing
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Product Demos
Collaboration | Seamless remote collaboration - zipBoard
YouTube
zipBoard - Design review & annotation tools
YouTube
Manage your review cycles into actionable phases in zipBoard
YouTube
How to get visual feedback on a WordPress site - zipBoard
YouTube
Why zipBoard is the right Design Review and QA platform
YouTube
Adding Content Phases in zipBoard
YouTube
Product Details
- About
- Integrations
- Competitors
- Tech Details
What is zipBoard?
zipBoard supports teams building digital content at scale, making it easier for non technical stakeholders to share feedback using annotations and screenshots. By using zipBoard for collecting feedback for Digital content, users can:
- Share feedback using annotated screenshots and screen recordings
- View all the incoming feedback from multiple stakeholders in one place.
- Assign, prioritize and organize the issue into an internal team’s workflow
- Manage different versions and different content pieces in the same project for review
- Work on managing feedback on different assets including live websites, web apps, e-learning courses, PDF documents, videos, images.
zipBoard Features
Online Proofing Features
- Supported: Annotations
Additional Features
- Supported: Bug Tracking
- Supported: Bug reports
- Supported: Collaboration
- Supported: elearning reviews
- Supported: QA testing
- Supported: Agile planning
zipBoard Screenshots
zipBoard Videos
zipBoard Integrations
zipBoard Competitors
zipBoard Technical Details
| Deployment Types | Software as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based |
|---|---|
| Operating Systems | Unspecified |
| Mobile Application | No |
| Supported Countries | Global |
| Supported Languages | English |
zipBoard Customer Size Distribution
| Consumers | 10% |
|---|---|
| Small Businesses (1-50 employees) | 20% |
| Mid-Size Companies (51-500 employees) | 40% |
| Enterprises (more than 500 employees) | 30% |
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews
Community Insights
TrustRadius Insights are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, 3rd-party data sources. Have feedback on this content? Let us know!
- Business Problems Solved
- Pros
- Cons
- Recommendations
Users have found that zipBoard is a valuable tool for various use cases, improving task management, communication, and collaboration in their organizations. With its easy-to-use interface and effective results, this software has made a positive impact on daily tasks. The application's simplicity and logical design make it intuitive for users to manage tasks and process customer feedback seamlessly. Users appreciate the ability to receive screenshots and notes directly in the software, eliminating the need for back-and-forth emails and streamlining communication and collaboration. This feature has proven especially helpful for conducting website audits and showcasing proposed design changes to potential clients, as users can easily make relevant notes and share them.
Reviewers also highlight the ease of use of zipBoard, noting features such as remembering sort order and support for images and videos. It has been successfully employed in various scenarios, such as reviewing and automating training courses, facilitating reviews between internal and external groups for websites, and collaborating on website development with distributed teams. In fact, some users have compared zipBoard favorably to Airtable, finding it more user-friendly for clients who need to see comments in the context of the website. While some improvements like drag-and-drop sorting of tasks, capturing entire web pages in screenshots, remembering sort order from the last session, and allowing formatting of text within task descriptions have been suggested by users, overall they have had positive experiences with zipBoard.
Despite minor drawbacks and ongoing fixes, many users recommend this software. Although some users encountered challenges in convincing their coworkers to adopt zipBoard, they personally love it for its easy-to-use interface. For example, it has proved invaluable in reviewing e-learning modules and streamlining feedback processes between designers and coders. Additionally, zipBoard has made remote collaboration easier by facilitating communication and feedback on visual aspects of projects. It has also been utilized effectively as a project tracking tool for remote teams. Users report that zipBoard helps bridge communication gaps during website development and brings teams together, saving time and effort. While the software shows promise for capturing feedback in e-learning, further testing with users of varying technical abilities is recommended. Overall, zipBoard has emerged as a valuable tool for visual aids, task control, and gathering feedback from multiple stakeholders in organizations.
Efficient Data Display: Several users have praised the software for its efficient display of data. They have found it easy to showcase and present information to their subordinates and clients, making it an excellent tool for communication and reporting.
Flexible Project Management: Many reviewers appreciate the flexibility of the zipBoard environment in configuring and managing multiple projects. They value that it doesn't impose a specific method for everything, allowing them and their team to work in a way that suits them best.
Multiple Views and Accessibility: The ability to switch between table and Kanban views is highly valued by users. They find the different project views extremely useful, as it provides several ways to track progress, collaborate, and stay updated on project activities. Users also appreciate that both clients and internal teams can access the data while maintaining security measures.
Complicated Navigation: Users have found the navigation on the Pin screen and add comment screen to be complicated, especially when it comes to removing pins and navigating with the left button. Several reviewers have expressed frustration with this aspect of the software.
Errors and Freezes: Reviewers have mentioned that the software has errors and freezes, impacting the overall user experience. Some users have faced issues with the stability of the software, which can be disruptive and frustrating.
Too Many Menu Options: There is feedback about the software having too many menu options and features, making it difficult for users to figure out and utilize all functionalities. Several customers have expressed their struggle in understanding how to navigate through all the available options effectively.
Users of zipBoard have made the following recommendations based on their experiences with the tool:
-
Many users recommend zipBoard for its usefulness in reviewing content and files. They appreciate the easy-to-use interface, which allows them to seamlessly navigate through websites and add notes directly to specific sections. This feature is particularly helpful for freelancers and web agencies who need a streamlined way to provide feedback on projects.
-
Another common recommendation is for software review and communication between teams. Users highly recommend zipBoard for collaborative work, as it facilitates smooth communication and efficient sharing of feedback. It proves to be a valuable tool for both internal team collaboration and client reviews.
-
Some users suggest ensuring that firewalls allow zipBoard to work properly. This recommendation highlights the importance of checking firewall settings to avoid any potential issues with the tool's functionality.
In summary, users recommend zipBoard as a useful tool for reviewing content and files, enabling smooth communication between teams, and facilitating client reviews. They also advise ensuring that firewalls are configured correctly for optimal performance.