Likelihood to Recommend If a colleague was looking to tighten down their network I can easily recommend Snort to them. It gives you some more peace of mind knowing that its always scanning traffic for malicious looking code. Even things your major firewalls and security hardware might miss, Snort has picked up. Its an easy recommendation for me.
Read full review Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
It’s a dedicated Network Advanced Threat Detection and Prevention solution. Easy maintenance and low operating costs fit perfectly for SMEs. Variety of appliance selection makes NX the perfect choice for large enterprises. As it’s a dedicated solution with its own appliance, price is higher compared to NGTP add on solutions. FireEye is an ecosystem therefore when you’ve the EX or HX vice versa, you should be looking to NX. Otherwise, you’re missing the threat intel exchange on the network side reverse is the true. Sizing is important before the purchase, if you select a low end model for a busy network you lose your initial investment. For multiple NX deployments I highly recommend CMS. Without CMS you’ll lose the threat intel exchange and this will negatively reduce the risk scores.
Read full review Pros IPS detection. DoS detection. Packet logging. Read full review Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
Advanced detection of targeted attacks. Mandiant team effort is a big plus. Inline mitigation capabilities particularly well. Different deployment models for specific needs. License and information sharing selection 1 way or 2 way mode. Frequent updates. Low false positive rates. FireEye sandboxing is immune to sandboxing attacks. Central management (CMS) capabilities for managing several NX's. Extra IPS/IDS functionality in the product. Smartvision specific to lateral movement detection. Upgrades and updates with zero down time. Local FireEye support is superb. Multiple deployment scenarios (span, inline) in the same NX for different interface pairs. SSL inspection support. No need to maintain, build or updates the images. It's highly automatic. Read full review Cons At times can be unstable with Cisco bugs, require frequent upgrading. FTD images that are being pushed for ASAs are less efficient from an administration standpoint, no CLI. Read full review Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
Very first detected APT sample can pass the NX even it's inline blocking mode. Performance optimization for busy networks is cumbersome. CMS does not provide all the management capabilities, CLI or local config. Should be done for advanced customization. Constant limitations of tcpdump/ packet capture for 10G interfaces. IPS functionality is a bit cumbersome, not a full feature IPS, lack of signatures and customization of IPS signatures. It's not a full NDR solution or a UBA solution. Lack of device or user mapping. Forensics is based on the specific APT. May not provide the whole story and need some additional tools. You cannot make manual submission to NX (needs AX). You cannot access the kernel directly for deep analy[sis] or troubleshooting (assist from FireEye Support should be taken). Read full review Alternatives Considered For our organization, the Cisco defense in depth concept works the best. While Cisco can be made to work with other vendors, we have found the best in depth protection by integrating Cisco products for maximum visibility. We had a
Barracuda Web Filter , but it was difficult to maintain when you had limited scope on what you could block, so we created a whitelist only setup which required a lot of additional manpower. This wouldn't have covered new threats with DNS spoofing and the like. Sourcefire also integrated with our anti-malware platform (Cisco AMP) for even better visibility on what may be happening on the end users workstation. We are planning on adding in Cisco ISE to complete the approach and possibly stealthwatch to cover our bases in the future. The Palo Alto gear was interesting, but it was priced far out of our range.
Read full review Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
FireEye NX is a solid product. It gives you sustainable security throughout the organization. NX detection engines are more capable compared to others. Its catch rate is higher, FP rate is lower, [and] speed is awesome. NX can work for highly regulated environments with 1 way solution. Operation costs are much lower. Software quality is very good. It may have bugs, but these bugs do not compromise the security in general. SOC team loves the FireEye NX for its pinpoint detection capabilities. Local and partner support is exceptional.
Read full review Return on Investment Being open source, ROI on free is hard to beat for something that works. I believe it greatly enhances the security of my network. Read full review Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
As [a] financial company on the digital markets, we need to be safeguard for 0days and targeted attacks. FireEye NX provides the best updated protection with its enhanced capabilities. Security score based on detection/prevention metrics [is] very high ensuring the highest level of security. APTs in our region successfully detected and mitigated by the NX. For the ROI, in a six month period FireEye is paying off its [investment]. One negative thing, especially with increasing network bandwidths, [is that] you need to make [the] investment every two or three years. Read full review ScreenShots Trellix Network Security Screenshots