TrustRadius Insights
InVision Freehand has proven to be a valuable tool for various use cases, as reported by users, reviewers, and customers. Its low learning …
Starting at $4 per month per user
View PricingOverview
What is Freehand by InVision?
Freehand, from InVision headquartered in New York, is an online whiteboard that enables teams to plan, brainstorm, and draw together. It aims to give everyone a simple way to visually represent ideas with charts, diagrams, and drawings. Whether for mind…
Recent Reviews
Awards
Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards
Pricing
Freehand Free
$0
Cloud
per year per user
Freehand Pro
$4
Cloud
per month per user
Freehand Enterprise
Custom Quote
Cloud
Entry-level set up fee?
- No setup fee
For the latest information on pricing, visithttps://freehandapp.com/pricing/
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Starting price (does not include set up fee)
- $4 per month per user
Product Details
- About
- Competitors
- Tech Details
- FAQs
What is Freehand by InVision?
Freehand by InVision is a visual collaboration platform built for organizations. With pre-built templates, organized spaces tor project management, and interactive widgets and reactions. Freehand centralizes the entire workflow so to ensure alignment at every stage of the collaborative process. Teams can work together both in real-time or asynchronously no matter what timezone they're in with, according to the vendor, no learning curve. Freehand is available with flat-rate enterprise pricing options, to alleviate the strain of admin seat license management.
Freehand by InVision Technical Details
| Deployment Types | Software as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based |
|---|---|
| Operating Systems | Unspecified |
| Mobile Application | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Freehand, from InVision headquartered in New York, is an online whiteboard that enables teams to plan, brainstorm, and draw together. It aims to give everyone a simple way to visually represent ideas with charts, diagrams, and drawings. Whether for mind mapping, creating a customer journey map, or drafting up an org chart, Freehand can help teams make ideas and plans visual.
Freehand by InVision starts at $4.
Reviewers rate Support Rating highest, with a score of 9.3.
The most common users of Freehand by InVision are from Enterprises (1,001+ employees).
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(134)
Community Insights
TrustRadius Insights are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, 3rd-party data sources. Have feedback on this content? Let us know!
- Business Problems Solved
- Recommendations
InVision Freehand has proven to be a valuable tool for various use cases, as reported by users, reviewers, and customers. Its low learning curve and real-time collaboration capabilities make it ideal for running UX workshops and collaborating with different teams. The software serves as a hub for UI/UX designers, developers, project and product managers, and key stakeholders to access visual design assets and details. It bridges the collaboration gap for remote teams, providing a space to add to the pool of meaning and align stakeholders. Additionally, InVision Freehand is frequently used in the early brainstorming and prototype phases to quickly collaborate and share ideas with the team. It facilitates clear communication of requirements between clients and the development team, reducing the scope for misunderstanding. Moreover, it serves as a centralized place for collecting and archiving documents and assets, collecting product requirements, and delivering annotated design specs. With its virtual whiteboard feature, InVision Freehand is valuable for remote brainstorming sessions and documenting business problems. Users appreciate the wireframe elements provided by InVision Freehand for customizing and building products efficiently. The software has been praised for its regular updates and enhanced functionality that brings value to designers' work. Overall, InVision Freehand is widely used across disciplines for collaboration, ideation activities, wireframing, project planning, design critiques, and much more.
Users commonly recommend using InVision Freehand for collaborative creative projects and suggest utilizing it alongside other InVision products for a smoother experience. InVision Freehand is praised for facilitating brainstorming, real-time idea sharing, desktop and mobile responsive design, team collaboration, conversations and critiques of work, and post wireframes and screen mockups. Users also highlight its usefulness in sharing work between teams, creating specs with easy-to-attach comments, promoting teamwork, enhancing contact with consumers, collecting feedback and suggestions, improving the workflow of design teams, and working with collaborators.
Additionally, InVision is highly regarded as a great tool for collaboration and communication with customers. It is useful for UI/UX developers to test designs and maintain a consistent aesthetic for their brand. Users also find it valuable for project management and collaboration with stakeholders. InVision is recommended for designers working on website redesign projects, collaborating with external creative agencies, and individuals in the web and mobile design fields. Users advise exploring the trial period to assess if InVision aligns well with the team's needs and encourage team members to provide design feedback directly in the tool.
Craft by InVision is suggested as a companion tool for faster prototyping and importing graphic assets. However, users caution that understanding the pricing structure and permissions for different features is important when using InVision. They also remind others to archive screenshots locally, as projects need to be deleted to start new ones.
Invision Freehand is recommended for various purposes from design workflow to high fidelity prototypes, allowing collaboration between members and improving team designs.
Attribute Ratings
Reviews
(1-25 of 89)Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
February 22, 2023
Great feature set that can be used with multiple teams
It has robust functionality.
Cost effectiveness and while Miro is good for collaboration and sprint and PI planning, I think its too open-ended. Easy to get lost in a board. Snagit is my go-to tool but it is not a collaborative tool. If I could combine Snagits tools with Invisions look/feel...that would be the perfect collaboration product on the market in my opinion.
January 26, 2023
InVision Freehand Review for Design Managers
N/A. I do not use any other products.
January 23, 2023
Good tool for team collaborations!
December 08, 2022
Research needs more colors for sticky notes.
More of my colleagues has enterprise access to Invision.
December 07, 2022
Scratching many itches—some areas better than others
For real-time collaboration and whiteboarding Comparable to Mural and Miro Better and more flexible than Figma For written documentation: Different features and more limited than Google Doc Similar to Notion in editing experience but more limited in features For creating flowcharts, diagrams, and wireframes: Lucidchart can be more practical for standard flowcharts Balsamiq can be more feature-rich, but I prefer InVision's simpler approach InVision Freehand might be a more practical tool for wireframing than Figma or Lucidchart—unless reaching for Balsamiq. As a generic diagramming/drawing tool, Figma is more robust and feature complete. For sharing design artifacts and gathering feedback: Comparable to Figma and Zeplin Figma integration is rather limited, unlike the fuller feature support for Sketch. For scrapping/archiving a variety of resources Comparable to Miro in terms of visual embedding (e.g. visual assets, PDFs, etc) Different purposes than Google Drive: less file repository and more visual pinboard. --- Freehand does a lot of things that many other apps do to a different degree, while not fully specializing in one thing. It's a whiteboard, wireframing tool, discussion tool, and design tool—doing a better job in some areas than others. Certainly helps close gaps between work areas, but not 100% scratching the itch.
December 02, 2022
InVision Freehand is the Best Way to Collaborate
The two other platforms that people have tried to get us to use are Figma and Miro. Since we have been using InVision Freehand it works much better for our teams and is within the InVision environment that we are familiar with. The InVision Freehand tools and user interface are familiar and much more intuitive for us to work with. There has been no reason that we've seen to move to any of the other platforms because they're not easy to use as InVision Freehand is for us. As with everything else we do, our time is our money so why waste it and lose money on less functional platforms? We've also been looking at MURAL and also the new Zoom and Webex meeting whiteboard options they have introduced. Neither of those are really worth consideration. They're just not functional for us to even consider - especially when Freehand from inVision has been solving our needs for an excellent, collaborative workspace.
December 01, 2022
My Favorite White Board Tool in a Fully Remote Environment!
Honestly, Zoom and Teams don't compare for their whiteboarding. Mainly because those are glitchy and unreliable. I've tried using them in meetings and especially with Zoom (maybe because they are newer) it loads and freezes up. I like to be "on it" in meetings and can't have buggy software affecting the sessions. I feel Miro would be the main competitor. I've used Adobe XD sometimes because I usually have it up and am able to design quickly in it, but it is not easily sharable like InVision Freehand. I do like the many shape and color/opacity options Adobe XD offers. When I've used Miro, I wished there were more ways to know who's doing what, especially if someone is a guest. The user interface is quite beautiful for it and I can tell they've worked hard on having it compare with InVision Freehand and other whiteboarding tools. I feel like Miro has more of a learning curve. I love when I can go into a new design application and the commands are very similar, so I can jump right in with the exception of only a few things.
November 30, 2022
Great tool for designers!
It is part of our InVision Suite, which we primarily use for prototyping.
November 29, 2022
Rapidly iterate and collaborate remotely
November 29, 2022
Plenty of room to grow
I didn't select Invision Freehand. I have used Miro the most in the past and I feel like you are dragging behind what they offer. From my experience, their text editing tools are easier. They provide the ability to vote on activities. Attaching emojis to things actually works. The boards themselves are just a much higher fidelity and look more professional. NNG provides a ton of free templates that are only ever available in Miro.
November 29, 2022
Freehand makes a PMs life easier!
I chose InVision because others on my team were already using it! I still use other alternatives, but I love the simplicity of InVision and what it allows me to do.
November 29, 2022
InVision Freehand does it all
- Miro and Lucidchart
I love it way better than all the other ones I tried.
November 28, 2022
InVision Freehand Review
November 23, 2022
InVision Freehand makes collaborating with UX a lot easier for us!
November 16, 2022
InVision Freehand is a great tool for collaboration
November 11, 2022
Connectivity, Collaboration and New Design Paradigms
InVision Freehand is closing the gap and adding all the functionalities that some of these tools provide separately. In the race towards a one-stop digital design ecosystem, InVision Freehand is well poised to deliver and connect where others can't. I hope that with the news of Adobe acquiring Figma, InVision Freehand can continue to be a leader and pioneer in this space.
November 11, 2022
Hope this will be helpful.
The entire team uses it to create mockups and wireframing and also uses it to present to the business.
November 07, 2022
A good option for large teams
Because I feel it is more accessible and much simpler to use, the interface is very intuitive and this helps you to use it without experience
November 04, 2022
Helps remote work tremendously
The sharing/accessibility of the mocks. It’s hard for someone not on the design team to see their mocks unless the links were shared but this might be by design or license based.
November 04, 2022
Freehand versus Miro
Miro (formerly Realtime Board) is the original product concept for this tool and I used it for 3-4 years for product development. Invision is aesthetically a carbon copy of the tool but lacks in fine usability controls. We actually didn't choose Freehand, it just came as an added tool under our Invision subscription. It's helpful but knowing the previous tool, it's been a hard sell because it's just not as good. Again, it's really fine tuned usability things like navigation, zoom, switching from tool to tool, selecting and deselecting, etc.
November 02, 2022
It's the virtual whiteboard that works better than the real life in-person whiteboard!
The collaboration in a real-time manner is incredible at InVision Freehand, and arguably the best I've worked with to date. With the way work is getting done today, top-notch tools for discussion, alignment, and idea generation make a huge impact on the bottom line & the well-being of employees trying to get their work done in the most effective manner possible.
November 01, 2022
I have been a Freehand user for a while
I have found that between freehand InVision Freehand, Miro, MURAL and FigJam, each product does certain things differently. Some of those products execute certain features better than others. One benefit to InVision freehand is that it's sometimes nice to have all of your messy brainstorm sessions all in one place that is separate from your high fidelity work.
October 27, 2022
Welcome to the collaboration party!
Freehand is the least polished of the bunch. It doesn't instantly make your thoughts and design look sexy. It doesn't open up your designs to be edited live, inspected, and sliced up for export. It doesn't let you interact with flow charts, like showing or hiding long pieces of text. Text containers don't expand automatically to fit your text — it's the other way around. So you're often spending lots of little minutes fussing with ways to make it look better. i.e., I grabbed and scaled a group, but now the stroke is ridiculously chunky.
October 21, 2022
A Collaboration Tool for the New Way of Working
I used FigJam for a while and really liked it. It's been almost 9 months in size I've used it so I can't remember precise details, but at the time, I remember it being a little more 'sturdy' - it could handle more (bigger files). They are comparable products. Our organization chose to go with InVision and we, therefore, use the whole suite of InVision products. We wouldn't use FigJam and InVision.