TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Microsoft Publisher

Score8.2 out of 10

49 Reviews and Ratings

What is Microsoft Publisher?

Microsoft Publisher is a desktop publishing application available with an Office 365 subscription, or as a standalone download.

Categories & Use Cases

Very happy with Microsoft Publisher

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Microsoft Publisher to develop a number of products for our business, including advertising sheets, report covers, resume formatting for our resume assistance business, and certain presentation pages.

It helps us develop professional-looking documents both for internal and external clients.

We have tried other free or low-cost alternatives, and they simply cannot perform to the level of quality that Microsoft Publisher provides for our business.

Pros

  • Formatting
  • Design
  • Professional-looking products
  • High quality results

Cons

  • the interface for adding images is a little dificult to use initially

Return on Investment

  • While the product is relatively expensive relative to alternatives, it is the best ROI we have found
  • We do have trouble justifying the cost due to the frequency we use it.
  • There are features that it includes that we don't use, but seem to increase the cost.

Usability

Alternatives Considered

Canva

Other Software Used

Microsoft 365, Adobe Acrobat, Adobe PhotoShop

Microsoft Publisher still has a place in business

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Our organization uses Microsoft Publisher in several different ways. We track corporate agreements in Microsoft Publisher. We prepare publications and newsletters for employees and customers. Microsoft Publisher provides a unique tool for products and processes that other programs do not satisfy.

Pros

  • Allow a set of documents to be grouped together
  • Publish printed materials effectively
  • Track information

Cons

  • Some functions are inefficient
  • Missing flexibility with images
  • Allow for greater flexibility in print styles

Return on Investment

  • Tracking document templates in Microsoft Publisher has made the process more efficient
  • Effective communication with clients and employees
  • Added design features

Usability

Alternatives Considered

Canva

Other Software Used

Paycor, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Windows

Usability Review of Microsoft Publisher

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

we are using Microsoft Publisher for our day-to-day activities in our project like making banners and printing it on very high resolution scale. Our project has multiple requirement for banners and promotions, pamphlets and brochures making. We also have invitation letters and editing of documents related work involved. Publisher is one of the best software being used with a Microsoft Office license in our organisation.

Pros

  • Microsoft Publisher is just like Word, but Publisher, give much more features like multi page printing of single image and banner
  • We have faced very much difficulties for picture control in Microsoft Word, but Microsoft Publisher has much advanced picture. Control features with multiple alignment and distortion correction function.
  • We are also using Publisher for big banners for streets for promotion of our products, which is helping us on a very large scale advertisement with in-house design, designing, and printing of large banners easily

Cons

  • Publisher should must improve UI as it is familiar like Microsoft Word and not very much different from Word, Publisher can change UI and add multiple automation functions for banners and image designing
  • Templates and drafts can be much more improved as it has a very limited template and designs when it comes to picking pre-built projects

Return on Investment

  • we have invested on our Microsoft license for our team and that has made a very big productivity for making banners and holdings for our projects as making it from third party would cost much higher and the return is very well over the comparison with third-party vendors
  • Functionality is very easy, so we don’t have to train much to get it in production and use it efficiently so we don’t have to invest much on training and learning things and we can work on it directly with a very basic knowledge as well
  • It has functionality to get stored and share things directly to the OneDrive and using curated links, which is very secure and reliable to transfer files without losing picture and banners quality and share them in lossless quality.

Usability

Alternatives Considered

Canva and Adobe Express

Other Software Used

Adobe Express, Canva, Microsoft 365

Professional Content Creation in MS Office

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Microsoft Publisher to create high standard documents and infographics for sharing department- or company-wide. It gives a more professional look than Microsoft Word when the document is more flow or picture based, rather than pure written content.

Pros

  • Professional presentation
  • Infographics
  • Internal communication documents
  • Event information

Cons

  • Finding the right template
  • Unable to edit WordArt

Return on Investment

  • No extra fee as included within MS Office 365 suite.

Usability

Alternatives Considered

Microsoft Powerpoint and Canva

Other Software Used

Canva

Robb's Not Real Impressed With Micorosft Publisher

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

I use it for business cards, flyers, newsletters, and other lightweight desktop publishing projects. Microsoft Publisher is OK for quick and easy desktop publishing projects. It's useful because we have a lot of Microsoft Publisher boilerplate built up over the years so we can just take a previous project and repurpose it. When used that way it's time-efficient and cost-effective. It is not our first choice for new projects that demands detail and real creative energy.

Pros

  • Business cards
  • Internal memos that use a logo or a little bit of design.
  • Quick and simple flyers for internal events.

Cons

  • Formatting in general. It's a pain to refine a layout in Publisher in my opinion.
  • Microsoft is so invested in their approach to software and making it look and feel like an Office 365 application that they inadvertantly cripple applications like Publisher.
  • Earlier versions of Publisher gave you a lot more latitude and creative freedom. They were also much easier to work with. Not everything has to look like it's part of Office 365. They did the same ... thing to Access.

Most Important Features

  • It's very cheap since it is part of Office 365.
  • Since we have years of experience with Publisher and a lot of boilerplate, we can turn some documents over quickly.
  • Because it is part of Office 365 we have familiarity with the interface.

Return on Investment

  • It's a sunk cost so on easy projects there's a positive ROI.
  • Because it's not very good at creating long and/or complex documents we needed to obtain other applications to create long and/or complex documents.
  • It's just so not essential to what we do that the positive or negative ROI is negligible.

Alternatives Considered

QuarkXPress and Adobe InDesign

Other Software Used

Microsoft 365 (formerly Office 365), Adobe PhotoShop, Adobe Acrobat Reader DC, Adobe Premiere Pro, Adobe InDesign