Based on 29 verified reviews published in the last 18 months
Reviewers frequently identify other virtualization and automation platforms they have used or evaluated alongside Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization. A notable proportion of reviewers, 17%, mention Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, indicating its common use in similar environments for automation tasks. Red Hat OpenShift is also frequently cited, appearing in 10% of reviews, suggesting a natural ecosystem integration or comparison point given its container orchestration capabilities. Beyond the Red Hat ecosystem, traditional virtualization solutions are also present in user experiences. VMware ESXi, a long-standing hypervisor, is mentioned by 7% of reviewers, often alongside other alternatives. Similarly, Nutanix AHV and Proxmox VE are each noted by 7% of reviewers, highlighting a diverse landscape of hyperconverged infrastructure and open-source virtualization options considered by organizations. The consistent positive sentiment across all mentioned products suggests that these are generally viewed as viable or complementary solutions in their respective domains.
Reviewers frequently cite Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, with 17% mentioning its use, often alongside other Red H…
Reviewers frequently cite Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, with 17% mentioning its use, often alongside other Red Hat products. This indicates its role as a complementary tool for automation within environments utilizing OpenShift Virtualization, suggesting a preference for integrated solutions.
Red Hat OpenShift is mentioned by 10% of reviewers, highlighting its relevance as a related technology or platform. Its…
Red Hat OpenShift is mentioned by 10% of reviewers, highlighting its relevance as a related technology or platform. Its frequent appearance alongside OpenShift Virtualization suggests users often consider or integrate container orchestration with their virtualization strategies, leveraging the broader Red Hat ecosystem.
VMware ESXi is cited by 7% of reviewers as an alternative or previously used virtualization platform. This suggests tha…
VMware ESXi is cited by 7% of reviewers as an alternative or previously used virtualization platform. This suggests that users evaluating OpenShift Virtualization often come from or consider traditional hypervisor environments, indicating a direct comparison in virtualization capabilities.
Nutanix AHV is mentioned by 7% of reviewers, positioning it as another significant hypervisor in the competitive landsc…
Nutanix AHV is mentioned by 7% of reviewers, positioning it as another significant hypervisor in the competitive landscape. Its inclusion indicates that users are exploring hyperconverged infrastructure solutions in addition to, or as an alternative to, Red Hat's offerings.
Proxmox VE is noted by 7% of reviewers, suggesting its consideration as an open-source virtualization alternative. Its…
Proxmox VE is noted by 7% of reviewers, suggesting its consideration as an open-source virtualization alternative. Its presence indicates that some organizations evaluate a range of solutions, including those that offer flexibility and cost-effectiveness.
Red Hat OpenShift has positively impacted business objectives primarily through identified cost reductions and operational efficiencies. A significant portion of feedback, cited by 31% of reviewers, indicates that OpenShift offers cost savings compared to VMware, noting a lower Total Cost of Ownership and reduced licensing expenses. This sentiment is reinforced by an additional 21% of reviewers who broadly report increased savings on virtualization licensing and overall lower costs. Beyond financial savings, OpenShift contributes to operational improvements, with 10% of reviewers noting an enhanced security posture and another 10% experiencing faster delivery times for applications and services. While these benefits are widely acknowledged, some reviewers raise concerns about the associated human capital costs. Specifically, 7% of reviewers mentioned challenges related to staff retraining and managing a workforce with limited experience in OpenShift, highlighting potential initial investments in upskilling. The overall sentiment suggests a positive return on investment driven by cost efficiencies and accelerated operations, tempered by the need for staff adaptation.
A substantial portion of reviewers, 31%, found Red Hat OpenShift to be more cost-effective than VMware, citing lower To…
A substantial portion of reviewers, 31%, found Red Hat OpenShift to be more cost-effective than VMware, citing lower Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and significant reductions in licensing expenses. However, this topic also includes a mention of the cost of retraining staff, indicating a mixed financial picture when transitioning.
Beyond specific comparisons to VMware, 21% of reviewers generally reported positive cost savings as a direct impact of…
Beyond specific comparisons to VMware, 21% of reviewers generally reported positive cost savings as a direct impact of implementing Red Hat OpenShift. These savings were primarily attributed to reduced licensing expenses and a lower overall cost structure.
Red Hat OpenShift has positively impacted business objectives by enhancing security, as noted by 10% of reviewers. User…
Red Hat OpenShift has positively impacted business objectives by enhancing security, as noted by 10% of reviewers. Users experienced an increased security posture and improved maintenance of security standards within their environments.
Reviewers, representing 10% of the feedback, highlighted that OpenShift significantly contributes to business objective…
Reviewers, representing 10% of the feedback, highlighted that OpenShift significantly contributes to business objectives by enabling quicker delivery of applications and services. This improved speed translates into faster time-to-market and more efficient virtualization processes.
Reviewers frequently integrate a variety of software alongside Red Hat OpenShift, primarily focusing on automation, foundational operating systems, and specialized infrastructure management. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform stands out as the most frequently cited complementary tool, mentioned by 24% of reviewers, underscoring its perceived value in automating IT operations and configuration management. Within the broader Red Hat ecosystem, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is also noted by 7% of reviewers, indicating its role as a stable base for enterprise deployments. Beyond specific Red Hat products, a general reliance on various Linux distributions, including Fedora and CentOS, is observed among 7% of reviewers, highlighting the importance of open-source operating systems. For cloud and data management, Azure VMware Solution is mentioned by 7% of reviewers, suggesting its utility in hybrid cloud strategies. Additionally, Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes, also cited by 7% of reviewers, points to a focus on robust data protection and recovery for containerized applications. These patterns collectively suggest that users leverage a diverse set of tools to build comprehensive, automated, and resilient environments that complement their OpenShift deployments.
Reviewers frequently integrate Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform with their OpenShift environments, indicating its va…
Reviewers frequently integrate Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform with their OpenShift environments, indicating its value in automating IT operations and infrastructure management. Its consistent mention by 24% of reviewers suggests it plays a key role in streamlining workflows for users.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is identified by 7% of reviewers as a foundational operating system used in conjunction…
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is identified by 7% of reviewers as a foundational operating system used in conjunction with other Red Hat products. Its inclusion highlights its role as a stable and reliable base for enterprise applications and infrastructure.
Reviewers occasionally cite various Linux distributions, such as Fedora and CentOS, as part of their broader technology…
Reviewers occasionally cite various Linux distributions, such as Fedora and CentOS, as part of their broader technology stack alongside other Red Hat products. This indicates a general reliance on open-source Linux operating systems to complement their Red Hat deployments.
Azure VMware Solution is mentioned by 7% of reviewers as a complementary technology, suggesting its use in hybrid cloud…
Azure VMware Solution is mentioned by 7% of reviewers as a complementary technology, suggesting its use in hybrid cloud strategies or for managing virtualized environments. Its inclusion points to the integration of on-premises VMware infrastructure with Azure cloud services.
Reviewers cite Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes, indicating a focus on data protection and disaster recovery specifically fo…
Reviewers cite Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes, indicating a focus on data protection and disaster recovery specifically for containerized applications within their environments. This highlights the importance of specialized backup solutions within a Kubernetes-centric setup.
Red Hat OpenShift is primarily utilized by organizations as a strategic solution for migrating away from existing virtualization platforms, particularly VMware. Nearly half of the reviewers, 48%, are actively engaged in or planning migrations from VMware to OpenShift Virtualization, often driven by cost considerations and the desire to modernize infrastructure. Reviewers frequently highlight OpenShift's role as a viable and often more cost-effective alternative to VMware, a sentiment expressed by 21% of reviewers. The platform enables organizations to host traditional VM workloads alongside containerized applications within a unified environment, a capability mentioned by 14% of users. This convergence of virtualization and container management on a single platform is seen as a key advantage, offering a unified approach to diverse workloads, as noted by 10% of the feedback. Furthermore, cost savings are a significant driver, with 10% of reviewers explicitly citing the product's ability to lower virtualization expenses compared to previous solutions.
Many organizations are actively migrating or planning to migrate their virtual machine workloads from VMware to Red Hat…
Many organizations are actively migrating or planning to migrate their virtual machine workloads from VMware to Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization, a process cited by 48% of reviewers. This transition is often motivated by a desire to reduce costs associated with VMware licenses and to modernize their infrastructure, allowing them to consolidate both traditional VMs and newer containerized applications on a single platform. Reviewers note the ability to host both types of workloads concurrently during the migration process.
Red Hat OpenShift is frequently adopted as a direct replacement for existing virtualization solutions, with 21% of revi…
Red Hat OpenShift is frequently adopted as a direct replacement for existing virtualization solutions, with 21% of reviewers seeing it as a strong alternative to VMware. This move is often driven by commercial considerations and a perceived lack of flexibility in legacy platforms. Reviewers appreciate OpenShift's capability to provide a comprehensive virtualization and containerization platform on-premises.
Organizations leverage Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization to host and manage virtual machine workloads, often alongside c…
Organizations leverage Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization to host and manage virtual machine workloads, often alongside containerized applications, a use case noted by 14% of reviewers. This capability allows for the integration of traditional and modern workloads within a single cluster. It is particularly useful for applications that are not yet ready for containerization or for setting up servers for specific application requirements.
Red Hat OpenShift is valued for providing a unified platform that can manage various types of workloads, including virt…
Red Hat OpenShift is valued for providing a unified platform that can manage various types of workloads, including virtualization, clusters, and containers, a benefit highlighted by 10% of reviewers. This consolidation helps organizations streamline operations and potentially reduce costs by having a common environment for both virtual machines and containerized applications. It offers a single solution for diverse infrastructure needs.
A significant business problem addressed by Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization is the reduction of operational costs, wit…
A significant business problem addressed by Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization is the reduction of operational costs, with 10% of reviewers explicitly mentioning cost savings. Users report that the platform is a more economical alternative compared to previous virtualization solutions like VMware. These savings are often a key driver for migrating to OpenShift, alongside the benefits of modernizing infrastructure.
Red Hat OpenShift has positively impacted efficiency in application development processes, primarily through its virtualization capabilities, integrated management features, and support for modern development standards. A significant portion of reviewers, 15%, specifically highlight OpenShift Virtualization for its role in consolidating diverse workloads and streamlining VM management. This functionality allows organizations to combine legacy virtual machines with newer containerized applications on a single platform, leading to reduced overhead and centralized control. Furthermore, OpenShift's integration capabilities are valued for creating seamless transitions between development and production environments, with 8% of reviewers noting improved efficiency in managing both containers and virtual machines from a unified interface. The platform also contributes to efficiency by enabling the adoption of new development paradigms and standards, such as DevOps roles, as mentioned by 5% of reviewers. These aspects collectively contribute to a more efficient and streamlined application development lifecycle, allowing for easier migration of virtual machines and fostering modern development practices.
Reviewers frequently highlight OpenShift Virtualization for its ability to combine legacy and new workloads on a single…
Reviewers frequently highlight OpenShift Virtualization for its ability to combine legacy and new workloads on a single platform, leading to improved efficiency and cost savings. This feature is particularly valued for reducing the overhead associated with managing VM environments and facilitating the easy migration of virtual machines. The capability to access both VMs and containers through OpenShift also streamlines product implementation and centralizes workload management.
Reviewers appreciate OpenShift's integration capabilities, which are seen as crucial for streamlining the application d…
Reviewers appreciate OpenShift's integration capabilities, which are seen as crucial for streamlining the application development lifecycle, particularly between development and production environments. The platform's ability to manage both containers and virtual machines from a single panel significantly increases efficiency. Additionally, users note improvements in the upgrade process, contributing to overall operational efficiency.
OpenShift is credited with enabling organizations to adopt modern development standards and paradigms, such as new DevO…
OpenShift is credited with enabling organizations to adopt modern development standards and paradigms, such as new DevOps roles, which contributes to a more modular approach to application development. The platform facilitates a unified environment that allows access to both virtual machines and containers, supporting these evolving standards. This helps organizations build new platforms and onboard applications efficiently.
Reviewers of Red Hat OpenShift primarily leverage its infrastructure within on-premises environments, with 18% of reviewers explicitly noting this deployment model. While many are currently using it exclusively on-premises for critical applications and initial workload testing, there is a clear strategic intent among some to expand its use. A significant portion, 10% of reviewers, are either planning or actively implementing a hybrid or multi-cloud strategy, often extending their on-premises OpenShift deployments to public cloud environments. This expansion is driven by objectives such as enhancing resiliency, improving disaster recovery capabilities, and providing more robust solutions for edge deployments. Furthermore, 8% of reviewers highlight OpenShift's utility in workload migration and platform unification, viewing it as a key enabler for transitioning on-premises workloads to the cloud and consolidating diverse applications onto a consistent platform. This suggests that while on-premises remains a foundational use case, OpenShift is increasingly seen as a tool for broader, more flexible infrastructure strategies.
Reviewers predominantly report using Red Hat OpenShift in on-premises environments, with 18% of reviewers explicitly st…
Reviewers predominantly report using Red Hat OpenShift in on-premises environments, with 18% of reviewers explicitly stating this current deployment model. While some are exclusively on-premises, others are exploring or planning to extend this usage to hybrid or cloud strategies, indicating a transitional phase for some organizations. This suggests that while on-prem is a current reality, future directions often involve broader deployment strategies.
A notable portion of reviewers, 10%, are either actively pursuing or planning a hybrid or multi-cloud strategy with Red…
A notable portion of reviewers, 10%, are either actively pursuing or planning a hybrid or multi-cloud strategy with Red Hat OpenShift. This often involves extending existing on-premises deployments to public cloud environments for benefits like improved resiliency, disaster recovery, and broader deployment options. Reviewers also acknowledge OpenShift's capability to support both on-premise and public cloud, including air-gapped environments, as a key factor in these strategic considerations.
Reviewers find Red Hat OpenShift valuable for facilitating workload migration and achieving platform unification, with…
Reviewers find Red Hat OpenShift valuable for facilitating workload migration and achieving platform unification, with 8% specifically mentioning these benefits. The ability to move workloads from on-premises to public cloud environments is seen as a key advantage, offering flexibility and choice in deployment. This capability supports the goal of consolidating diverse workloads onto a single, consistent platform.