Name: User Interviews
Price: 3000 USD
Rating: 8.8 (18 reviews)
Author: User Interviews

Help Desk

Web and Video Conferencing

Customer Support

Agile Development

Image Recognition

Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)

Service Mesh

Development

Alumni Management

Education

Business Intelligence (BI)

Collaboration

Contract Management

Streaming Analytics

Supply Chain Management

Enterprise

Accounting

Cash Flow Management

Investor Relations

Finance and Accounting

Applicant Tracking

Corporate Learning Management

HR Management

Payroll

Talent Intelligence

Talent Management

Workforce Analytics

Workforce Management

Human Resources

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM)

Cloud Storage

Data Integration

Data Lakehouse

Data Mapping

Database Load Balancing

Database Performance Monitoring

Debugging

Edge Computing

Ethernet Switches

Event Monitoring

Fraud Detection

Governance, Risk & Compliance

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Internet Security

Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

Managed Hosting

Master Data Management (MDM)

Network Diagnostics

Network Performance Monitoring

Packet Analyzer

SQL Server Performance Monitoring

Storage Management

Tape Storage

Threat Intelligence

Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)

Information Technology

A/B Testing

AI Writing Assistant Software

Ad Serving & Retargeting

All-in-One Marketing

Community

Content Management

Digital Rewards

Email Marketing

Marketing Analytics

Marketing Automation

Predictive Analytics

Social Media Management

Survey & Forms Building

Video

Video Collaboration

Web Analytics

Marketing

Interactive Whiteboard

Project Management

Professional Services

Customer Relationship Management (CRM)

Sales

Application Security

Microsegmentation

Security

3D Modeling

Animation

Computer-Aided Design (CAD)

Municipal

Vertical-Specific

Find top rated software and services based on in-depth reviews from verified users. 400+ software categories including PaaS, NoSQL, BI, HR, and more.

UserTesting

QuestionPro

QuestionPro Inc

Lyssna

Wynter

Optimal

Optimal Workshop

Dovetail

Kantar Research Services

Kantar

Qualtrics XM for Strategy and Research

Qualtrics

Genesys Multicloud CX (discontinued)

Discontinued Products

Respondent.io

Respondent Inc

Zoom Workplace

Google Calendar

Google Meet

Qualtrics XM for Customer Frontlines

Lookback

SurveyMonkey

Typeform

### Participant Recruitment
User Interviews's participant recruitment functionality is generally well-received by users, who appreciate the ease of setting up studies and the quick turnaround time for finding qualified participants. While some users have expressed minor concerns about the need for improvements in managing projects and ensuring participant quality control, overall, User Interviews seems to effectively meet users' needs for recruiting diverse and specific audiences for research studies. The platform's ability to connect researchers with a wide pool of potential participants, both from their own user base and the platform's panel, contributes to streamlining the recruitment process and saving time in gathering valuable insights.

### Screening and Selection
User feedback on User Interviews's screening and selection features is generally positive, with users highlighting the platform's ease of use and ability to quickly recruit participants that meet specific research criteria. Some users appreciate the flexibility in creating multiple versions of screeners to target niche personas, while others find the platform intuitive and efficient in setting up studies. However, there are suggestions for improvement, such as enhancing the screener functionality with branching capabilities and additional question types to further streamline the participant selection process. Despite some limitations mentioned, users overall find User Interviews's screening and selection functionalities valuable for their research recruitment needs.

### Compensation and Incentives
User Interviews's users have varied opinions about its compensation and payment methods. While some appreciate the ease of receiving compensation through Amazon gift cards or PayPal, others express a desire for more diverse payment options such as Visa or MasterCard gift cards. The platform's efficiency in handling participant compensation is acknowledged, but there are concerns about the limited payment choices available. Additionally, instances of payment discrepancies and cancellations have been reported, leading to mixed feedback on the overall compensation and incentives experience provided by User Interviews.

### Research Studies Management
User sentiment regarding User Interviews' research studies management capabilities is generally positive, with users highlighting the platform's ease of use, efficient participant recruitment, and effective project setup and management tools. Users appreciate the platform's ability to target specific respondents for research projects, making it easier to gather valuable insights. While some users mention areas for improvement such as enhancing quality control measures and providing better tools for researchers to flag issues before participant involvement, overall, User Interviews is praised for its ability to streamline the research studies management process and deliver high-quality participants promptly.

### Survey Design and Execution
User feedback on User Interviews' survey design and execution features varies widely. While some users appreciate the ease of creating and customizing surveys to target specific audiences efficiently, others express frustration with limitations such as the inability to include matrix questions or the lack of branching capabilities in screeners. The platform's ability to find research participants quickly and its clear payment options are highlighted as positives, but concerns about lengthy surveys, repetitive questions, and communication issues with survey coordinators are also raised. Despite mixed opinions, User Interviews appears to offer a user-friendly interface for creating insightful surveys, although there is room for improvement in certain areas based on user experiences.

### Scheduling and Logistics
Users consistently praise User Interviews for its efficient scheduling and rapid participant recruitment capabilities. The platform's ability to source qualified participants within hours and facilitate self-scheduling has been a game-changer for researchers. While some users have experienced occasional no-shows, the overall sentiment leans towards User Interviews streamlining the scheduling process effectively. The platform's user-friendly interface and quick turnaround time for setting up and filling projects have garnered positive feedback, with users appreciating the ease of finding suitable candidates and managing scheduling logistics.

### User Experience Research
Users consistently praise User Interviews for its user research capabilities. The platform's ability to facilitate user experience research has garnered positive feedback, with users highlighting the ease of finding and recruiting participants for their studies. User Interviews is commended for its efficient recruitment process, which saves time compared to manual methods. Additionally, users appreciate the quality of participants recruited through the platform, emphasizing the seamlessness of the recruitment process. The platform's continuous improvement and user-friendly interface contribute to a positive user experience in conducting user research.

### Market Analysis Techniques
User Interviews receives positive feedback for its market analysis techniques, with users highlighting the platform's ability to efficiently connect researchers with the right target audience for their market research projects. Reviewers appreciate the ease and speed with which User Interviews facilitates the recruitment process, enabling researchers to gather valuable insights and feedback from their desired market segments. The platform's market analysis techniques are commended for streamlining the process of obtaining real-time reactions and feedback on minimum viable products and concepts, ultimately aiding in capturing an accurate market sentiment swiftly and effectively. Users find User Interviews to be a valuable tool for conducting primary research, particularly in conducting group conversations and one-on-one interviews to enhance client innovation. The platform's market analysis techniques are lauded for simplifying the recruitment process, allowing researchers to focus on meaningful conversations with the right participants without the need for extensive recruiting expertise.

### Customer and User Perspectives
Users consistently praise User Interviews for its ability to facilitate the gathering of diverse opinions and perspectives effectively. They appreciate the platform's user-friendly interface that simplifies the process of sharing experiences and insights. Many users find value in the opportunity to provide feedback on various products and services, contributing to a more inclusive and comprehensive market research landscape. The platform's focus on customer and user perspectives is seen as a key strength by those who have engaged with it, highlighting its importance in shaping future goods and services.

### Quality Assurance
User feedback consistently highlights User Interviews' robust quality assurance measures, ensuring the delivery of high-caliber participants for research activities. Reviewers appreciate the platform's ability to maintain quality standards, leading to insightful conversations and impactful outcomes. While some users suggest areas for improvement in quality control processes, overall sentiment leans towards a positive view of User Interviews' quality assurance practices.

### Communication and Feedback
Users have varied opinions on User Interviews's messaging platform and communication capabilities. While some users appreciate the quick and efficient communication tools provided, others have encountered challenges with tracking messages or experiencing delays in participant responses. The platform's ability to facilitate smooth communication and gather valuable feedback is acknowledged by many, although there are occasional hiccups reported in the messaging interface. Despite these mixed reviews, User Interviews seems to be making efforts to address communication issues and enhance the overall user experience.

### Qualitative Research Insights
Users consistently praise User Interviews for its ability to provide high-quality participants for qualitative research projects. The platform's qualitative research insights capabilities are highly regarded, with users noting the ease of communication with participants and the efficiency in gathering diverse insights. The ability to quickly recruit and schedule participants for qualitative studies has been a key factor in the platform's success, leading to impactful research outcomes and satisfied clients.

### Usability Testing
Users appreciate User Interviews for its streamlined process in selecting specific participants for usability testing, allowing for a sample closely aligned with target demographics. However, there are some concerns regarding the ease of conducting screen share sessions with candidates during usability studies. Despite these minor drawbacks, User Interviews is generally commended for its usability testing capabilities in facilitating the identification of suitable candidates for research purposes.

### Project and Participant Coordination
User feedback on User Interviews' project and participant coordination capabilities varies widely. While some users praise the platform for its efficient recruitment process and ability to quickly schedule research sessions with qualified participants, others express concerns about the size of certain participant panels, particularly in regions like the UK. Despite differing opinions, many users appreciate the simplicity of setting up projects and the support provided in recruiting diverse and reliable participants for various types of research studies. The platform's ability to streamline the participant selection process and offer a wide range of research opportunities is highlighted as a significant benefit by users across different industries.

### Niche Audience Engagement
User feedback consistently highlights User Interviews' strength in engaging niche audiences effectively. Users appreciate the platform's ability to streamline the process of reaching out to specific and hard-to-find demographics. The intuitive self-service tool and the thorough screening process contribute to the platform's success in connecting researchers with qualified participants from niche markets. Additionally, the platform's efficiency in sourcing respondents within tight deadlines and limited budgets has been commended, showcasing its commitment to catering to specialized audience needs.

Users commonly recommend using User Interviews for remote moderated research. They praise the speed, quality, and customer service of the platform, mentioning the helpfulness of the staff and prompt responses. Users also suggest reaching out to support if any issues arise, as they have experienced fast response times and effective issue resolution. To ensure specific participant requirements are met, users advise being detailed when setting up the screener. Additionally, they recommend having backup sources for very specific target participants.

User Interviews offers a research platform to provide users a source of truth for participant management. The solution can be used to automate recruiting, scheduling, and contacting research participants. Users can choose to automatically distribute incentives in a selected amount, and participants can redeem their reward in the form of dozens of digital gift cards.

Recruit - Pay as you Go

Recruit - Starter

Recruit - Essential

Research Hub - Essential

Essentials

Advanced

Team Edition

Research Edition

Alchemer (formerly SurveyGizmo) is an online survey tool that helps companies design surveys and collect and analyze data. Features include branding, logic & branching, mobile surveys, question types, and reporting.

Collaborator

Professional

Full Access

Enterprise and Business

Alchemer

User Interviews

Market Research

Research Hub Explainer by User Interviews

Likelihood to Recommend

Tools and techniques that enable qualitative and quantitative research into consumer markets.

Competitor and Industry Benchmarking

Enables users to compare their performance against specific competitors or their industry as a whole. This may include cross-channel traffic, audience engagement, market share, tech stacks, strategy, etc.

Competitor Research

Quantitative and qualitative tools that are used to identify competitors and assess their strengths and weaknesses, with a view toward identifying competitive advantages and opportunities for improvement.

Web Traffic Analysis

The ability to analyze, segment, and track competitive web traffic with usage metrics based on traffic share, pricing, paid search, demographics, geographic region, customer journeys, engagement, user sentiment, etc.

Consumer Feedback

The ability to collect feedback from customers, prospects, focus groups, interviewees, etc.

Competitor alerts

Alerts notify users when their competitors have entered a new customer segment, modified their strategy, incorporated new products or services, changed their prices for specific products, etc.

Market Insights and Reports

Reports, newsfeeds, and information related to events, industry trends, or competitive insights.

Financial Research

The most important features for the effectiveness of a financial research platform

Public Company Data

The ability to access fundamentals, earnings, or other information through company filings and other sources

Private Company Data

The ability to access fundamentals, earnings, or other information for companies that are not publicly listed

Industry and Sector Research

The quality and completeness of analyses and research on the overall performance and outlook of specific sectors and industries

Industry-Specific Information

The quality and completeness of industry-specific information, e.g., the progress or success of clinical trials in the pharmaceutical industry

Independent Research Access

The ability to access third-party analyses, e.g., Morningstar reports

Search Tools

The quality and effectiveness of tools to help locate specific and relevant information within the platform

Sales Intelligence Data Standards

How well does the contact, company, and industry information provided by the SI tool meet the user’s needs? Is the availability and quality of data satisfactory?

Contact information

Information about individual contacts is available and high quality.

TrustRadius is a technology and business research firm based in Austin, Texas. The company is known as a review platform for verified B2B technology and software reviews through a proprietary algorithm and human verification.

TrustRadius

Home

Market Research Services

I use it with multiple clients for recruiting, scheduling, communication with participants, sending incentives
- the whole recruiting management
- inviting my own participants / inviting participants from the panel

Scheduling
Fast recruiting
Incentives management

Fraudelent participants
No language mutations
Expensive

More User research in the company =more data
More research = product being built according to users needs
More research = more downloads (of our mobile app), bigger revenue

User Interviews

Overview

What is User Interviews?