AspenOne Supply Chain Management vs. StockIQ Technologies

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AspenOne SCM
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
StockIQ Technologies
Score 9.4 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
StockIQ is a supply chain planning suite developed for distributors and manufacturers by industry practitioners, with the goal of helping users to improve forecast accuracy, and reduce inventory levels, while providing unmatched service to customers.
$575
per month
Pricing
AspenOne Supply Chain ManagementStockIQ Technologies
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AspenOne SCMStockIQ Technologies
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AspenOne Supply Chain ManagementStockIQ Technologies
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
AspenOne Supply Chain ManagementStockIQ Technologies
Supply Chain Planning
Comparison of Supply Chain Planning features of Product A and Product B
AspenOne Supply Chain Management
-
Ratings
StockIQ Technologies
8.2
1 Ratings
12% above category average
Custom alerts00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
Resource optimization00 Ratings7.31 Ratings
Supply forecasting00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Order Fulfillment Management
Comparison of Order Fulfillment Management features of Product A and Product B
AspenOne Supply Chain Management
-
Ratings
StockIQ Technologies
8.6
1 Ratings
9% above category average
Purchase order generation00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
Supplier delivery scheduling00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Logistics and Transportation Management
Comparison of Logistics and Transportation Management features of Product A and Product B
AspenOne Supply Chain Management
-
Ratings
StockIQ Technologies
5.5
1 Ratings
28% below category average
Shipping performance00 Ratings5.51 Ratings
Demand Management
Comparison of Demand Management features of Product A and Product B
AspenOne Supply Chain Management
-
Ratings
StockIQ Technologies
9.1
1 Ratings
22% above category average
Demand forecasting00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Customer analytics00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Inventory stock optimization00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Sales and operations planning00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AspenOne Supply Chain ManagementStockIQ Technologies
Small Businesses
Acumatica
Acumatica
Score 8.7 out of 10
Acumatica
Acumatica
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Acumatica
Acumatica
Score 8.7 out of 10
Acumatica
Acumatica
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Anaplan
Anaplan
Score 8.6 out of 10
Anaplan
Anaplan
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AspenOne Supply Chain ManagementStockIQ Technologies
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
AspenOne Supply Chain ManagementStockIQ Technologies
Likelihood to Recommend
Aspen Technology
Good for large organizations but can be used across various industries from manufacturing to even medical. Also very Citrix publishing friendly to allow multiple users located anywhere to use AspenOne Supply Chain Management across the organization while consolidating their data in a centralized secure place. This ability to consolidate and centralize applications and data within the same facility makes migration, high availability in DR scenario easier to configure as well.
Read full review
StockIQ Technologies
We have year end buying goals discounts offered to us, StockIQ allows us to determine whether or not these are worthwhile to our company. It allows us to easily reach out several months to see what that would look like.
Read full review
Pros
Aspen Technology
  • Provides a wealth of data and information interpreted across management and supply chain team located at various offices and plants globally
  • Implementation was with relative ease with small dedicated team. Implementation time was also quick from launch to go-live in three business quarters.
  • Excellent technical support from AspenOne and their tier support is knowledgeable on the product.
  • Good bug fixes and quick support along with predictable update release schedule.
Read full review
StockIQ Technologies
No answers on this topic
Cons
Aspen Technology
  • While AspenOne Supply Chain Management generate a wealth of data and information, the ability to organize and create reports can be time consuming as well as steep learning curve.
  • While incremental updates are predictable, AspenOne major version updates can be difficult to implement with wide user impact causing more downtime than we prefer.
  • Report merge and legacy version conversion tools can be made easier to use with more GUI (graphical user interface) options and less command base as well as status progress graphic and confirmation of completion would be very helpful.
Read full review
StockIQ Technologies
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Aspen Technology
AspenOne Supply Chain Management was a cheaper alternative to SAP HANA and while as not feature-ful and not as easy to integrate with SAP data, the interface was easy enough to configure without the need for HANA. It was also easier and quicker to deploy and implement which alleviated our business pain point. It's like an old saying the best software is the one you can use, now! Our management and supply chain team members have been happy with the product and very few complaints arise from the production usage or performance.
Read full review
StockIQ Technologies
We previously used Rockysoft that has since become obsolete, SIQ has the options from that program that we enjoyed and so much more, ease of use and visibility of details have been a real game changer.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Aspen Technology
  • We needed AspenOne Supply Chain Management quickly back in 2013 since our biggest pain point was tracking movement of products and ability for multiple departments and locations to access the information to complete their responsibilities within the organization. Was able to successfully implement in three quarters for go-live.
  • Since our initiation implementation our two major version upgrades did not go as smooth as we would like causing downtime of user access and the system does not have flexibility to run previous version while upgrading to new version. Upgrade path needs to improve to minimize downtime.
  • The business reported quick ROI of better than expected results and the software paid for itself in under three years which beats projection.
  • Centralized implementation makes disaster recovery (DR) configuration easier to manage.
Read full review
StockIQ Technologies
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots—