The BlueJeans Meetings platform supported video, audio and web conferencing with the collaboration tools, as a cloud service that connects desktops, mobile devices and room systems in one video meeting. It was acquired in 2020 by Verizon and discontinued in the sunsetting of the BlueJeans product line by Verizon, in 2023.
$0
per month
GoTo Meeting
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
From GoTo (formerly LogMeIn), GoToMeeting is an online meeting, desktop sharing, and video conferencing software that enables users to connect via the internet. It hosts a suite of online meeting tools, including real-time screen sharing and integrated audio.
$12
per month
Pricing
BlueJeans Meetings (discontinued)
GoTo Meeting
Editions & Modules
BlueJeans Basic
$0
per user
Bluejeans Standard
$9.99
per host/per month
Bluejeans Pro
$13.99
perhost/per month
Bluejeans Enterprise
$16.66
per host/per month
Professional
$12.00
Per Organizer / Per Month for 150 Participants [billed annually]
Business
$16.00
Per Organizer / Per Month for 250 Participants [billed annually]
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
3,000 Participants
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BlueJeans Meetings (discontinued)
GoTo Meeting
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Pricing available by monthly or annual subscription, with discounts for annual commitments.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BlueJeans Meetings (discontinued)
GoTo Meeting
Considered Both Products
BlueJeans Meetings (discontinued)
Verified User
Account Manager
Chose BlueJeans Meetings (discontinued)
GoToMeeting is more helpful for recording sessions, but BlueJeans has an easier-to-use mobile app and polling system. BlueJeans is about on par with Zoom in terms of reliability and functionality, in my experience.
We used GoToMeeting for a long time. Had a multiplicity of issues through the use of the software, in addition to the cost, which was triple the cost of implementing BlueJeans. We currently have a ZOOM account as well, as some clients specifically asked to communicate via Zoom, …
I've utilized and upheld many gathering items in my vocation (Zoom, gotomeeting, WebEx) and BlueJeans Meetings certainly has the least hindrance to getting a quick meeting started and is one of the easiest platforms to support.
Select Blujeans Meetings because it allows me to better convey my ideas and at the same time build trust through real-time videoconferences. As well as sharing documents and presentations via screen sharing, I love the option to record play and then share the recording to …
Verified User
Executive
Chose BlueJeans Meetings (discontinued)
Not only 3, there are many other I tried but as I disclosed earlier, i faced problems in terms of audio and video quality. I always concern about these 2 criteria because I will be regularly in contact with clients. The reason I selected BlueJeans especially for this criteria …
We needed a tool that allowed our external users to effortlessly join and collaborate with our internal team. This is where this tool really shines compared to some of the others. BlueJeans fit the need and when it was time for collaboration we were thrilled to hear BlueJeans …
My organization selected BlueJeans because the project co-lead was already used to holding meetings on it before, and wanted to continue using it for the new project they were part of. I would say BlueJeans is more 'old school' than the other options, not as widely used as …
BlueJeans is amazing because it's simple, it's reliable, it does the job it is intended for without extra bells and whistles.
Staff has the confidence that they don't have to fiddle with overly complicated software to to make a presentation or share their point of view during a …
BlueJeans is head and shoulders above all other VC products we evaluated including MS Teams.
Functionality does exist in the other platforms which we would like to see on BlueJeans but not at the expense of the quality service we currently receive.
Zoom and Webex work pretty well, and I would say those are my top three choices. BlueJeans seemed to be the best fit for us with the price point package they offered. The only downside is that I feel like the other two are more widely used at this time and therefore easier to …
BlueJeans is and continues to be at the top of my list as it is easily command-able and very user-friendly. I admit that I can be swayed to listen to pitches from other products, but I will state that "Well BlueJeans can..." often. The other products have their perks, but …
Easier to schedule meetings in BlueJeans, and far easier to automatically record and share webinars, compared to Adobe. I don’t use Cisco Webex much since it is inferior to Adobe.
I like BlueJeans better than both GoTo Meeting and Zoom. I don't like the room listing on GoTo and I find Zoom's interface cumbersome. I definitely like BlueJeans' simple desktop app interface, very intuitive.
I prefer BlueJeans to the other technologies we've evaluated. It has the best combination of video/audio quality and user experience. Many of the other technologies require downloading the app or simply have a bad experience. They're all flawed in their own way, BlueJeans seems …
Even though its alternatives are more popular and have a wide range of features, I prefer using GoTo Meeting because it's very user-friendly and less complicated. For fast and simple online meetings, I would choose GoTo Meeting over its alternatives.
Verified User
Team Lead
Chose GoTo Meeting
GoTo Meeting closely stacks up to other video conference platforms. That being said, Zoom seems to have the best integration for businesses, while GoTo Meeting has some of the best security I have seen in a video conferencing platform. GoTo Meeting is fairly seamless in …
goTo Meeting is great for keeping our teams connected both internally as well as with customers. It's easy for us to use, easy for customers to use and easy to create and manage meetings. I've used other products that make it difficult to sign in and GoTo does not have that …
we wanted alternatives and improvements in the meetings, and some apps have limitations of participants or tools for use in live meetings, as well as testing the interface and if the use is easy and intuitive for everyone also that there is a good reliability of the app for use …
While each of these products are similar, we had already been using GoTo Meeting prior to availability of the others. The price point of the competitors is enticing and is something that should be taken into consideration, but we have had no issues with GoTo Meeting. The …
GoTo Meeting is a solid contender in the video conferencing solution market. It does some things incredibly well and is clearly a market leader when it comes to webinar-style conferencing. Other things it is less strong in, like co-authoring or multiple conflicting technical …
I selected GoTo Meeting for all my online callings because of the video and audio qualities it offers,it gives the best qualities making all our online meetings so effective. It has an intuitive and easy-to-use interface giving exceptional call qualities and they have …
GoTo Meeting ended up costing less than a comparable Zoom enterprise license, though it's still an additional cost over Microsoft Teams, which we are technically already paying for as part of our O365 subscription. Functionality is largely the same as Zoom, though end-users who …
GoTo Meeting is the best in terms of quality and performance. It features unlimited meetings with no time limits and can be deployed from the mobile app, browser or desktop app.
There is little to choose from when looking at a lot of the platforms in terms of video quality and ease of use. I have preferred Zoom more recently as it seems to work a lot better. BlueJeans is excellent in terms of sounds and video quality as well. PowWow Now is much worse …
GoToMeeting is the gold standard when it comes to overall value and connection quality. Others, such as Slack and Google Hangouts, require other users to have accounts and be existing users (and even then, there are limitations in terms of connecting various groups). The …
GoToMeeting is about as easy to use as Zoom and BlueJeans. It is comparable to Amazon Chime, but less integrated than Google Hangouts/Chat. Almost all these solutions include file sharing, screen sharing, chat, and polling. The most helpful features are dial-in numbers and …
GoToMeeting is on par with these other platforms. There are pros and cons to each. The main difference is what users prefer to use based on the features and type of meeting available. For example, some companies have conference rooms that are built with Zoom or Hangouts …
GoToMeeting is well known, and it has pedigree in the space. For internal use, I would recommend a solution that it is part of your existing back-office infrastructure.